Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:13:22.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Temperature Inequalities in the Electrolytic Tank

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

A. Platt
Affiliation:
Department of Fluid Mechanics, University of Liverpool
J. F. Norbury
Affiliation:
Department of Fluid Mechanics, University of Liverpool

Extract

Accurate representation of a model field in an electrolytic tank requires, among other things, that the electrical conductivity of the liquid should be everywhere constant. Einstein and Sander and Yates have discussed the importance of other possible inaccuracies, and have shown that by correct probe design, circuit design and choice of electrode materials, these may be made very small. This note describes very briefly some experiments, carried out in two shallow electrolytic tanks, which demonstrate that the principal error can be that introduced by variations of conductivity produced by non-uniformity of temperature distribution in the electrolyte. The point is of particular importance since the results also showed that the mechanical design of the tank can have a vital bearing on the achievement of uniform temperature.

Type
Technical Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Einstein, P. A. (1951). Factors Limiting the Accuracy of Electrolytic Plotting Tanks. British Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 2, p. 49, 1951.Google Scholar
2.Sander, K. F. and Yates, J. G. (1953). The Accurate Mapping of Electric Fields in an Electrolytic Tank. Proceedings of the Institute of Electrical Engineers, Vol. 100, Part II, No. 74, p. 167, April 1953.Google Scholar
3.Glasstone, S. (1956). Text-book of Physical Chemistry, 2nd edition. Macmillan, London 1956.Google Scholar