Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:33:57.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sting corrections to zero-lift drag of axisymmetric bodies in transonic flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

P. R. Viswanath  and
G. Rajendra
P. R. Viswanath
Affiliation:
Experimental Aerodynamics DivisionNational Aeronautical Laboratory, Bangalore, India
G. Rajendra
Affiliation:
Experimental Aerodynamics DivisionNational Aeronautical Laboratory, Bangalore, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments at transonic speeds have been performed on several boat-tailed afterbodies and sting combinations with a view to assessing sting corrections to the measured afterbody drag at transonic speeds. Measurements made included afterbody total drag and base pressure in the Mach number range of 0.6-1.0 and Reynolds number range of 8-9.5 x 106. Correlations of base pressure and boat-tail pressure drag for the sting diameter and flare effects have been proposed using dimensional arguments. The correlations provide quick and reliable estimates for corrections that can be applied to the measured zero-lift drag of axisymmetric bodies with either contoured or conical boat-tailing.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 94 , Issue 938 , October 1990 , pp. 279 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1990 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cahn, M. S. An Experimental Investigation of Sting Support Effects on Drag and a Comparison with Jet Effects at Transonic Speeds, NACA Report 1353, 1958.Google Scholar
2. Mcdonald, H. and Hughes, P. F. A correlation of subsonic afterbody drag in the presence of a propulsive jet or support sting, J Aircr, 1965, 2, pp 202–207.Google Scholar
3. Tuttle, M. H. and Gloss, B. B. Support Interference of Wind Tunnel Models – A Selective Annotated Bibliography, NASA TM 81909, 1981.Google Scholar
4. Tuttle, M. H. and La Wing, P. L. Support Interference of Wind Tunnel Models – A Selective Annotated Bibliography, Supplement to NASA TM 81909, 1984.Google Scholar
5. Sykes, D. M. Sting Interference Effects on Afterbodies at Transonic Speeds, AGARD CP 124, Paper No. 27, 1973.Google Scholar
6. Tunnell, P. J. Investigation of Sting-Support Interference on Base Pressure and Forebody Chord Force at Mach Number from 0.6 to 1.3, NACA RM A54 K16a, 1954.Google Scholar
7. Viswanath, P. R. Passive devices for axisymmetric base drag reduction at transonic speeds, J Aircr, 1988, 25, (3), pp 258–262.Google Scholar
8. Cubbage, J. M. JR. Jet Effects in Base and Afterbody Pressures of a Cylindrical Afterbody at Transonic Speeds, NACA RM L56 C21, 1958.Google Scholar
9. Gloss, B. B. and Sewall, W. G. Support-Sting Interference on Boat-tail Pressure Drag for Reynolds Numbers up to 70 x 106, AIAA Paper 83-0387, 1983.Google Scholar
10. Viswanath, P. R. and Rajendra, G. Sting-Support Interference on Afterbody Drag at Transonic Speeds, NAL TM EA 8902, 1989.Google Scholar
11. Swamy, M.S., Ahmed, S. and Sreenath, G. S. Model Support System Interference on Zero-lift Drag at Transonic Speeds, AIAA paper 78-809, 1978.Google Scholar
12. Kurn, A. G. Drag Measurements on a Series of Afterbodies at Transonic Speeds Showing the Effect of Sting Interference, RAE TR 66298, 1966.Google Scholar