Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T08:18:05.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Air Transportation Concepts for the Future

Part of: RAeS Lanchester Lecture Papers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

R. H. Miller
R. H. Miller*
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Throughout his career, Lanchester’s phenomenal engineering output was directed mainly towards the automobile which proved in his day to be a more suitable vehicle than the aeroplane for the practical application of the products of his genius. Aeronautics remained always a compelling avocation “wholly individual … never backed by funds from external sources”, to quote his own words. During the First World War he did contribute to the practical solution of a serious tail flutter problem on Handley Page and de Havilland aircraft, making him probably one of the first applied aeroelasticians. However, his major contributions, cited in the 1931 award of the Guggenheim medal, were to the fundamental theory of aerodynamics. The full extent of these contributions is still being explored as Dr. J. P. Jones in the Thirteenth Lanchester Lecture points out. His contributions to automotive engineering, on the other hand, were immediately reduced to practice and it therefore seems appropriate in this Fourteenth Lanchester Lecture which it is my great privilege to present, to examine whether, as we continue the full exploitation of his discoveries in aeronautics, the aeroplane will ever be able to complement, possibly even replace to a degree, the ubiquitous automobile to whose practical realisation as a safe, comfortable and reliable transport medium he contributed so much.

Type
Fourteenth Lanchester Memorial Lecture
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 75 , Issue 727 , July 1971 , pp. 431 - 456
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1971 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Connelly, M. E. The metropolitan Boston transportation problem, Electronic Systems Laboratory, Report ESL-R-378, March 1969.Google Scholar
2. Simpson, R. W. and Neuve Eglise, M. J. A method for determination of vehicle size and frequency of service for a short haul V/STOL air transport system, MIT, Flight Transportation Laboratory, Report R-68-1, May 1968.Google Scholar
3. Concept studies for future intercity air transportation systems, MIT, Flight Transportation Laboratory, Report FTL R-70, December 1970.Google Scholar
4. A systems analysis of short haul air transportation, MIT, Flight Transportation Laboratory, Technical Report 65-1, August 1965.Google Scholar
5. Taneja, N. K. and Simpson, R. W. A multi-regression analysis of indirect operating costs, MIT, Flight Trans portation Laboratory, Report R-67-2, June 1968.Google Scholar
6. Miller, R. H. Air transportation in the eastern corridor, Society of Automotive Engineers, Report 660332, April 1966.Google Scholar
7. Pearlman, C. and Simpson, R. W. Maintenance cost studies of present aircraft sub-systems, MIT, Flight Transportation Laboratory, Report FT-66-2, November 1966.Google Scholar
8. Gallant, R., Scully, M. and Lange, W. Analysis of VSTOL aircraft configurations for short haul air transportation systems, MIT, Flight Transportation Laboratory, Report FT-66-1, November 1966.Google Scholar
9. Hafner, R. VTOL transport, the case for the convertible rotor, The Tenth Cierva Memorial Lecture. Royal Aeronautical Society, October 1969. (To be published in The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society). Google Scholar
10. Miller, R. H. and Simpson, R. W. VSTOL in the north east corridor, AIAA, Astronautics and Aeronautics, September 1968.Google Scholar
11. Stoessel, R. F. and Gallagher, J. E. A standard method for estimating VTOL operating expense, AIAA, Paper No 67-828, October 1967.Google Scholar
12. Taneja, N. K. and Simpson, R. W. A simulation study of dynamic scheduling of a VTOL airport feeder system, MIT. Flight Transportation Laboratory, Report FTL-R68-6, January 1969.Google Scholar
13. Levin, A. Some fleet routing and scheduling problems for air transportation systems, MIT, Flight Transportation Laboratory, Report R-68-5, January 1969.Google Scholar
14. Simpson, R. W. Scheduling and routing models for air line systems, MIT, Flight Transportation Laboratory, Report R-68-3, December 1969.Google Scholar
15. Wilson, N. H. M. CARS—computer aided routing system, MIT, Civil Engineering Systems Laboratory, Report R-67-12, April 1967.Google Scholar
16. Taneja, N. K. Interim progress report on a model for forecasting future air travel demand on the North Atlantic, MIT, Flight Transportation Laboratory, March 1971.Google Scholar
17. Lowson, M. V. and Ollerhead, J. B. Studies of helicopter rotor noise, Wyle Laboratories Research Staff, Report WR-68-9, 1968.Google Scholar
18. Sadler, S. G. and Loewy, R. G. A theory for predicting the rotational and vortex noise of lifting rotors in hover and forward flight, NASA, CR-1333, May 1969.Google Scholar
19. Yudin, E. Y. On the vortex sound from rotating rods, NACA, TM-1136, 1947.Google Scholar
20. Gutin, G. L. On the sound of a rotating propeller, NACA, TM-1195, 1948.Google Scholar
21. Garrick, I. E. and Watkins, C. E. A theoretical study of the effect of forward speed on the free-space sound-pressure field around propellers, NACA, TN 3018, 1953.Google Scholar
22. Widnall, S. E. Helicopter noise due to blade/vortex interaction, Journal of the Acoustical Society, to be published, 1971.Google Scholar
23. Scully, M. P. Computation of helicopter rotor wake geometry and its influence on rotor harmonic airloads, MIT, PhD thesis to be published, 1971.Google Scholar
24. Widnall, S. E. A correlation of vortex noise data from helicopter main rotors, AIAA, Journal of Aircraft, May-June 1969.Google Scholar
25. Schlegal, R., King, R. and Mull, H. Helicopter rotor noise generation and propagation, US Army Aviation Labs., TR-66-4, 1966.Google Scholar
26. Sawyer, R. F. Reducing jet pollution before it becomes serious, AIAA, Astronautics and Aeronautics, April 1970.Google Scholar
27. Allen, E. and Simpson, R. W. Ground facilities for a VTOL intercity air transportation system, MIT, Flight Transportation Laboratory, Report FTL R69-2, May 1970.Google Scholar
28. Miller, R. H. Aerodynamics in the next decade, Canadian Aeronautics and Space Journal, January 1963.Google Scholar
29. Eggers, A. J. Jr., Allen, H. J. and Neice, S. E. A comparative analysis of the performance of long-range hyper-velocity vehicles, NACA, Report 1382, 1958.Google Scholar
30. Ferri, A. Review of problems in application of supersonic combustion, Seventh Lanchester Memorial Lecture, Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, September 1964.Google Scholar
31. Gregory, T. J., Williams, L. J. and Wilcox, D. E. The airbreathing launch vehicle for earth orbit shuttle—per formance and operation, AIAA, Paper No 70-270, Febru ary 1970.Google Scholar
32. Eggers, A. J. Jr., Petersen, R. H. and Cohen, N. B. Hypersonic aircraft technology and applications, AIAA, Astronautics and Aeronautics June 1970.Google Scholar
33. Hunter, M. II, and Fellenz, D. W. The hypersonic transport—the technology and the potential, AIAA, Paper No 70-1218, October 1970.Google Scholar
34. Martin, J. A. Acceleration exposure to passengers of the aerospace-plane, MIT, Man-Vehicle Laboratory Report, May 1969.Google Scholar
35. Standard method of estimating comparative direct operating costs of turbine powered transport airplanes, Air Transport Association of America, December 1967.Google Scholar
36. Hallett, N. C. Study, cost, and system analysis of liquid hydrogen production, NASA, CR-73, 226, June 1968.Google Scholar
37. Ferri, A. and Ismail, A. Effects of lengthwise lift distribution on sonic boom of SST configurations, AIAA Journal, August 1969.Google Scholar