Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T03:34:33.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Slug, an Erstwhile Unit of Mass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

R. C. Pankhurst*
Affiliation:
Aerodynamics Division, National Physical Laboratory

Extract

The general adoption of the International System of Units (SI) in engineering as well as in science makes this the time to relinquish the slug, an engineering unit of mass. Seldom has a convenient unit proved so contentious. This note sets out salient points in the controversy, and indicates basic issues which could scarcely have been appreciated universally at the time.

In essence the slug is the unit of mass that goes with the pound force or the pound weight, just as the poundal is the force unit that goes with the pound-mass. There has, however, been a great deal of argument as to whether it is a true derived unit or simply a fundamental unit in disguise, and about how to realise it in practice: in particular, if unit force is defined or established by reference to the gravitational force on the pound-mass, there arises immediately the question of the appropriate value to use for g, i.e. should it toe the local value, the value at a specified place, or some other agreed standard acceleration?

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1970 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Guggenheim, E. A. Units and dimensions. Phil Mag, Vol. 33, 479, 1942.Google Scholar
2. Bairstow, L. Applied Aerodynamics. London, Longmans. First edition 1919, second edition 1939.Google Scholar
3. Lanchester, F. W. The Theory of Dimensions and its Application for Engineers. Crosby Lockwood, London, 1936.Google Scholar
4. Conversion factors and tables, British Standard 350: Part 1: 1959 (British Standards Institution).Google Scholar