Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:00:03.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Sequel to Technical Note 15: The SHEBA Family of Shell Elements for the Matrix Displacement Method

Part III: Large Displacements*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. H. Argyris
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London Institut für Statik und Dynamik der Luff- und Raumfahrtkonstruktionen, Universität Stuttgart
D. W. Scharpf
Affiliation:
Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London Institut für Statik und Dynamik der Luff- und Raumfahrtkonstruktionen, Universität Stuttgart

Extract

The large displacement analysis of shells of arbitrary form is rightly considered to be a formidable undertaking. A purely analytical approach to the solution of such problems involving also initial buckling, post-buckling and secondary instability or snap-through is at the present state of knowledge impossible. However, with the advent of the matrix displacement method initiated in 1954 it became increasingly apparent that this method would prove in time the ideal tool for the solution of such complex structural phenomena. Nevertheless, all efforts in this direction were bedevilled until recently by the lack of suitable elements, satisfying all kinematic compatibility conditions. The major breakthrough came in this direction through the invention of the triangular shell element SHEBA, which admits an arbitrary variation of curvature. This again evolved from a natural extension of the plate element TUBA of TN 14. At the same time the SHEBA theory of ref. 1 was restricted to small displacements or linear behaviour. To generalise it to large displacements was not possible without an additional major conceptual progress. This was achieved within the Technical Notes 17 to 20, which introduced the idea of a local sub-element and showed how its geometrical stiffness could be used to deduce the geometrical stiffness of the complete element by a physically evident argument. The attentive reader will have noticed that the sub-element of an arbitrary beam in space discussed in ref. 3 is the obvious component block for our shell element. As a matter of fact, the technique is simply based on the representation of the SHEBA element by a grid of beam sub-elements running along the natural α, β, γ directions.

Type
Technical Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1969 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Parts I and II were published in the October 1968 JOURNAL, pp 873-883.

References

1. Argyris, J. H. and Scharpf, D. W. The SHEBA Family of Shell Elements for the Matrix Displacement Method. The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 72, No 694, pp 873883, October 1968.Google Scholar
2. Argyris, J. H. and Scharpf, D. W. A Sequel to Technical Note 13: The Curved Tetrahedronal and Triangular Elements TEC and TRIC for the Matrix Displacement Method, Parts I and II. The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol 73, No 697, pp 5565, January 1969.Google Scholar
3. Argyris, J. H. and Scharpf, D. W. Some General Considerations on the Natural Mode Technique, Parts I and II. The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. 73, No 699, pp 218226, March 1969. No 700, pp 361-368, April 1969.Google Scholar
4. Argyris, J. H. Energy Theorems and Structural Analysis, Part I, General Theory. Aircraft Engineering, Vol 26, October, November 1954, Vol 27, February, March, April, May 1955.Google Scholar