Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:45:18.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A review of some current research on pressure sensitive paint and thermographic phosphor techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

K. Kontis
K. Kontis*
Affiliation:
Aero-Physics and Measurement Technology Laboratory, Advanced Flows Diagnostics & Instrumentation Special Interest Group, School of Mechanical, Aerospace & Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper discusses the development and application activities within the Aero-Physics and Measurement Technology Laboratory at the University of Manchester on pressure sensitive paint and thermographic phosphor optical imaging systems for gas dynamic applications. It provides a brief review of the basic principles, fundamental theory, properties, chemical characteristics and bonding technologies associated with the two systems. A number of case studies are presented, which exhibit the range of applicability, limitations and potential for further development of the technologies.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 111 , Issue 1122 , August 2007 , pp. 495 - 508
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2007 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kontis, K., Syogengi, Y. and Yoshikawa, N. Surface thermometry by laser-induced fluorescence of Dy:YAG, Aeronaut J, August 2002, 106, (1062), pp 453–457.Google Scholar
2. Kontis, K. Surface heat transfer measurements inside a supersonic combustor by laser induced fluorescence, J Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, July 2003, 7, (3), pp 320–325.Google Scholar
3. Engler, R.H., Merienne, M.C., Klein, C. and Sant, Y. Application of PSP in low speed flows, Aerospace Science and Technology, September 2002, 6, (5), pp 313–322.Google Scholar
4. Alaruri, S., Bonsett, T., Smith, D., Macri, F. and Brewington, A. An endoscopic imaging system for turbine engine pressure sensitive paint measurements, Optics and Lasers in Engineering, September 2001, 36, (3), p 277–287.Google Scholar
5. Kammeyer, M., Kelble, C., Donovan, J., Benne, M. and Kihlken, T. Recent improvements in pressure-sensitive paint measurement accuracy at Boeing, AIAA-paper 2002-2907.Google Scholar
6. Nakakita, K. and Asai, K. Pressure-sensitive paint application to a wing-body model in a hypersonic shock tunnel, AIAA paper 2002-2911.Google Scholar
7. Cates, M.R. Applications of pulsed-laser techniques and thermographic phosphors to dynamic thermometry of rotating surfaces, Instrument Society of America, 1985, ISA 85-0356.Google Scholar
8. Noel, B.W., Turley, W.D. and Allison, S.W. Thermographic phosphor temperature measurements: commercial and defense related applications, Instrument Society of America, 1994, ISA 94-1003.Google Scholar
9. Tobin, K.W., Allison, S.W., Gates, M.R., Capps, G.J., Beshears, D.L. and Cyr, M. Remote high temperature thermometry of rotating test blades using YVO4:Eu and Y2O3:Eu thermographic phosphors, 1988, AIAA 88-3147.Google Scholar
10. Merski, R.N. Global aero heating wind-tunnel measurements using improved two color phosphor thermography method, J Spacecraft and Rockets, March-April 1999, 36, (2), pp 160–170.Google Scholar
11. Goss, L.P. and Post, M.E. Surface thermometry of energetic materials by laser-induced fluorescence, Annual Technical Report on AFOSR Contract F49620-87-C-0040, April 1988, Systems Research Laboratories, Dayton, OH, USA.Google Scholar
12. Chyu, M.K. and Bizzak, D.J. Measurement of surface temperature using a laser-induced fluorescence thermal imaging system, Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, 24-27 May 1993, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, 93-GT-214.Google Scholar
13. Alaruri, S.D., Brewington, A.J., Thomas, M.A. and Miller, J.A. High-temperature remote thermometry using laser-induced fluorescence decay lifetime measurements of Y2O3:Eu and YAG:Tb Thermographic Phosphors, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 42, (3), pp 735–739.Google Scholar
14. Noel, B.W., Borella, H.M., Lewis, W., Turley, W.D., Beshears, D.L. and Capps, G.L. Evaluating thermographic phosphors in an operating turbine engine, Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, Brussels, 11-14 June 1990, 90-GT-266.Google Scholar
15. Noel, B.W., Borella, H.M., Franks, L.A., Marshall, B.R., Allison, S.W., Cates, M.R. and Stange, W.A. Proposed laser-induced fluorescence method for remote thermometry in turbine engines, J Propulsion and Power, Nov – Dec 1986, 2, (6), pp 565–568.Google Scholar
16. Grattan, K. Palmer, A.W. and Willson, C.A. Miniaturised microscopic computer-based neodymium ‘decay-time’ temperature sensor, J Physics E: Scientific Instrumentation, 1987, 20, (9), pp 1201–1205.Google Scholar
17. Nutt, K.W. Thermographic phosphor technique, measurement techniques for hypersonic flows, Lecture Series 1990-05, von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, 1990, Belgium, pp 11–14.Google Scholar
18. Noel, B.W., Bibby, M.C., Hudson, C.L., Allison, S.W. and Tobin, K.W. Environmental tests of thermographic phosphors for turbine-engine temperature measurements, 1989, AIAA Paper 89-2913.Google Scholar
19. Cunningham, D.M., Allison, S.W. and Smith, D.B. Thermographic properties of eight blue-emitting phosphors, Instrument Society of America, 1993, ISA Paper 93-111.Google Scholar
20. Wetenkamp, L., West, G.F. AND Tobben, H. Optical properties of rare earth-doped ZBLAN glasses, J Non-Crystalline Solids, 1992, 140, (1), pp 35–40.Google Scholar
21. Leverenz, H.W. An Introduction to Luminescence of Solids, John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA, 1950.Google Scholar
22. Risenberg, L.A., Gandrud, W.B. and Moos, H.W. Multiphonon relaxation of near-infrared excited states of LaCl3:Dy+3, Physical Review, 1967, 159, (2), pp 262–266.Google Scholar
23. Fong, F.K. Theory of Molecular Relaxation: Applications in Chemistry and Biology, John Wiley & Sons, 1975, New York, USA.Google Scholar
24. Kontis, K. Molecular image sensing for pressure and temperature surface mapping of aerodynamic flows, RAeS Aerospace Aerodynamics Research Conference, 10-12 June 2003, Paper No 52, London, UK.Google Scholar
25. Wong, C., Amir, M., Lada, C. and Kontis, K. Pressure and temperature sensitive paints for aerospace applications, AIAA-paper 2004-598.Google Scholar
26. Campbell, B., Liu, T. and Sullivan, J. Temperature sensitive fluorescent paint systems, 1994, AIAA Paper 94-2483.Google Scholar
27. Liu, T. and Sullivan, J. Heat transfer and flow structures in an excited circular impinging jet, Int J Heat and Mass Transfer, 1996, 39, (17), pp 3695–3706.Google Scholar
28. Liu, T., Campbell, T., Sullivan, J., Lafferty, J. and Yanta, W. Heat transfer measurement on a waverider at Mach 10 using fluorescent paint, J Thermophysical Heat Transfer, 1995, 9, (4), pp 605–611.Google Scholar
29. Liu, T., Campbell, B. and Sullivan, J. Thermal paints for shock/boundary layer interaction in inlet flows, AIAA Paper 92-3626, 1992.Google Scholar
30. Mclachlan, B.G., Bell, J.H., Gallery, J., Gouterman, M. and Callis, J. Boundary-layer transition detection by luminescent imaging, AIAA Paper 93-0177, 1993.Google Scholar
31. Cattafesta III, L.N. and Moore, J.P. Uncetainty estimates for luminescent temperature-sensitive paint intensity measurements, AIAA Paper 95-2193, 1995.Google Scholar
32. Asai, K., Kanda, H., Kunimatsu, T., Liu, T. and Sullivan, J. Detection of boundary-layer transition in a cryogenic wind tunnel by using luminescent paint, AIAA Paper 96-2185, 1996.Google Scholar
33. Nakakita, K., Yamazaki, T., Asai, K., Tekuda, N., Fuji, A. and Kameda, M. Pressure-sensitive paint measurement in a hypersonic shock tunnel, AIAA paper 2000-2523.Google Scholar
34. Sakue, H., Sullivan, J.P., Asai, K., Iijima, K. and Kunimasu, T. AA-PSP in a cryogenic wind tunnel, ISA Proceedings of the 45th IIS, Instrument Society of America, 1999, pp 345–354.Google Scholar
35. Sakue, H., Matsumura, S.P., Schneider, S.P. and Sullivan, J.P. Anodised aluminium pressure-sensitive paint for short duration testing, AIAA paper 2002-2908.Google Scholar
36. Tekuda, N., Kameda, M., Amao, Y. and Asai, K. Experimental investigation on time response of PSP, Proceedings of the 31st JSASS, March 2000, pp 218–221.Google Scholar
37. Gartenburg, E. and Roberts, A.S. Thermosense XIII, SPIE 1467, 1991.Google Scholar
38. Hradil, J., Davis, C., Mongey, K., Mcdonagh, C. and Maccraith, B.D. Temperature-corrected pressure-sensitive paint measurements using a single camera and a dual-lifetime approach, Measurement Science and Technology, October 2002, 13, (10), pp 1552–7.Google Scholar
39. Dunleavy, M., Bedwell, D.J. and Davies, A., UK Patent GB 2283752, 1995.Google Scholar
40. Lock, G.D. Development of optical measurement technique: final report, ESPRC GR/M45191, 2002.Google Scholar
41. Mitsuo, K., Egami, Y., Suzuki, H. and ASAI, K. Development of lifetime imaging system for PSP, AIAA paper 2002-2909.Google Scholar
42. Holmes, J.W. Analysis of radiometric, lifetime and fluorescent lifetime imaging for pressure sensitive paint, Aeronaut J, April 1998, 102, (1014), pp 189–194.Google Scholar
43. Coyle, L.M. and Gouterman, M. Correcting lifetime measurements for temperature, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 61, (1-3), December 1999, pp 92–99.Google Scholar
44. Borovy, et al., Pressure sensitive paint application in shock wind tunnel, ICIASF Record, 1995, pp 34.1-34.4.Google Scholar
45. Ponomarev, et al, Fast responding pressure sensitive paints based on high concentration of hard particles in polymer, 6th Annual pressure sensitive workshop, 6-8 October, 1998, Boeing, Seattle, WA, USA,Google Scholar
46. Kontis, K. and Lada, C. Effect of dimples on glancing shock wave turbulent boundary–layer interactions, 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA-paper 2004-1058, January 2004.Google Scholar
47. Kontis, K. and Amir, M. Effect of oscillation on boundary-layer development with adverse pressure gradients, J Aircr, 2007, 44, (3), pp 875–887.Google Scholar
48. Kontis, K. Kainuma, M. and Takayama, K. High speed vortex-ring interaction studies, Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Shock Waves, Bangalore, India, International Shock Wave Institute, paper No 1032, July 2005.Google Scholar