Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:19:20.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent Developments in High Speed Research

In the Aerodynamics Division of the National Physical Laboratory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

J. A. Beavan  and
D. W. Holder
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Much work has been done on compressible flow since the contribution of the Aerodynamics Division to research in this field was last described to the Society by the late C. N. H. Lock in 1937. At that time he was able to review many of the data which were available from other sources, whereas today such a task would be impossible in a paper of this length. We shall confine ourselves here, therefore, to a description of some of the experimental work that has been done during the past few years in the high-speed laboratory of the Division, and to an account of the lines along which it is intended to continue the work in the future.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 54 , Issue 477 , September 1950 , pp. 545 - 586
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lock, C. N. H. Problems of High-Speed Flight as affected by Compressibility. Journal R.Ae.S., Vol. 42, p. 193 (1938).Google Scholar
2. Hankins, G. A. and Cope, W. F. The Flow of Gases at Sonic and Supersonic Speeds. Proc. I. Mech. E., App. Mech., Vol. 155, p. 401 (1946).Google Scholar
3. Knowler, A. E. and Holder, D. W. The Efficiency of High-Speed Wind Tunnels of the Induction Type. R. & M. 2448.Google Scholar
4. Holder, D. W. An Estimation of the Running Time of Induced-Flow Tunnels Driven from Compressed-Air Storage. A.R.C. 9902 (1946).Google Scholar
5. Holder, D. W. The High-Speed Laboratory of the Aerodynamics Division, N.P.L. R. & M. 2560 (1947).Google Scholar
6. Rogers, E. W. E. The 9½ in. Square High-Speed Tunnel. N.P.L. Aero Note 182 (1950).Google Scholar
7. Holder, D. W. and North, R. J. The 9 x 3 in. N.P.L. Induced-Flow High-Speed Wind I Tunnel. A.R.C. 12387 (1949).Google Scholar
8. Pearcey, H. H. Profile Drag Measurements at Compressibility Speeds on Aerofoils with and without Spanwise Wires and Grooves, Part II. R. & M. 2252 (1943).Google Scholar
9. Lilley, G. N. and Holder, D. W. Experiments on an Induction-Type High-Speed Wind Tunnel Driven by Low Pressure Steam. College of Aeronautics Report No. 24, A.R.C. 12317 (1949).Google Scholar
10. Ellis, D. L. Industrial Wind Tunnels. Journal R.Ae.S., Vol. 53, p. 797 (1949).Google Scholar
11. Wingham, P. J. An Application of Strain Gauges to the Measurement of Normal Force and Moment in High-Speed Wind Tunnels. A.R.C. 8723 (1945).Google Scholar
12. Bratt, J. B. and Chinneck, A. Measurements of Mid-Chord Pitching Moment Derivatives at High Speeds. A.R.C. 10709 (1947).Google Scholar
13. Lock, C. H. N., Hilton, W. F. and Goldstein, S. Determination of Profile Drag at High Speeds by a Pitot-traverse Method. R. & M. 1971 (1940).Google Scholar
14. The Cambridge University Aeronautics Laboratory. The Measurement of Profile Drag by the Pitot-traverse Method. R. & M. 1688 (1936).Google Scholar
15. Lock, C. N. H. and Beavan, J. A. Tunnel Interference at Compressibility Speeds using the Flexible Walls of the Rectangular High-Speed Tunnel. R. & M. 2005 (1944).Google Scholar
16. Giles, D. The N.P.L. Mach Number Gauge. R. & M. 2131 (1945).Google Scholar
17. Toepler, A. Optische Studien nach der Methode der Schlierenbeabachtung. Poggendorf's Ann. d. Phys. u. Chem., Vol. 131, p. 33 (1867).Google Scholar
18. Schardin, H. Die Schlierenverfahren und ihre Anwendungen. Ergebrisse der exakten Natarwissenschaften, Vol. 20, 1941; A.R.C. 10724.Google Scholar
19. Holder, D. W., Thompson, J. S. and MacPhail, D. C. Modern Developments in Fluid Dynamics, Vol. III, Ch. XI; A.R.C. 12854 (1950).Google Scholar
20. Holder, D. W. and North, R. J. The Toepler Schlieren Apparatus. A.R.C. 13068Google Scholar
21. Holder, D. W., Tomlinson, R. C. and Rogers, E. W. E. Preliminary Experiments on Blunt-nosed Plates in Supersonic Airstreams. A.R.C. 12418 (1949).Google Scholar
22. Holder, D. W. and North, R. J. A Colour Schlieren Apparatus. A.R.C. 12856 (1950).Google Scholar
23. Dvorak, V., Ueber eine neue einfache Art der Schlierenbeobachtung. Wiedemann's Ann. d. Phys. u. Chem., Vol. 9, p. 502 (1880).Google Scholar
24. Pearcey, H. H. The Indication of Boundary-layer Transition on Aerofoils in the N.P.L. 20 x 8 in. High-Speed Wind Tunnel. A.R.C. 11991 (1948).Google Scholar
25. North, R. J. and Holder, D. W. A Spark Light Source for Schlieren Photography. N.P.L. Aero Note No. 187 (1950).Google Scholar
26. Holder, D. W., North, R. J., Standring, W. G. and Looms, J. S. T. A High-Speed Camera for the Photography of Shock-wave Oscillations in a Wind Tunnel. A.R.C. 12543 (1949).Google Scholar
27. Holder, D. W. Transition Indication in the National Physical Laboratory 20 x 8 in. High-Speed Tunnel. R. & M. 2079 (1945).Google Scholar
28. Gray, W. E. A Simple Visual Method of Recording Boundary-Layer Transition (Liquid Film). A.R.C. 10028 (1946).Google Scholar
29. Pearcey, H. H. Profile Drag Measurements at Compressibility Speeds on Aerofoils with and without Spanwise Wires and Grooves, Part I. R. & M. 2252 (1943).Google Scholar
30. Fage, A. and Sargent, R. F. The Air-injection Method of fixing Transition for Laminar to Turbulent Flow in a Boundary Layer. R. & M. 2106 (1944).Google Scholar
31. Thompson, J. S. Present Methods of Applying Blockage Corrections in a Closed Rectangular High-Speed Wind Tunnel. A.R.C. 11385 (1948).Google Scholar
32. Fage, A. and Sargent, R. F. Shock-wave and Boundary Layer Phenomena near a flat surface. Proc. Roy. Soc. (A), Vol. 190, p. 1 (1947). A.R.C. 8964 (1945).Google Scholar
33. Lock, C. N. H. and Hilton, W. F. Note on a possible Source of Error of a Standard Airspeed Indicator at High Speed. R. & M. 1752 (1936).Google Scholar
34. Lock, C. N. H., Knowler, A. E. and Pearcey, H. H. The Effect of Compressibility on Static Heads. A.R.C. 6420 (1943).Google Scholar
35. Valensi, J. and Pruden, F. W. Some observations on Sharp-nosed Profiles at Supersonic Speed. R. & M. 2482 (1946).Google Scholar
36. Holder, D. W., North, R. J. and Chinneck, A. Addendum to Preliminary Experiments on Blunt-nosed Plates in Supersonic Airstreams. A.R.C. 12660 (1949).Google Scholar
37. Holder, D. W., North, R. J. and Chinneck, A. Observations of the Bow-waves of Blunt-nosed Bodies of Revolution in Supersonic Airstreams. A.R.C. 12495 (1949).Google Scholar
38. Hilton, W. F. Measurements of Supersonic Downwash behind Two Wings of Finite Span. A.R.C. 10779 (1947).Google Scholar
39. Holder, D. W. and Tomlinson, R. C. Observations on Shock-waves produced by Wires and Grooves in the Boundary Layer of a Supersonic Stream. A.R.C. 12494 (1949).Google Scholar
40. Ackeret, J., Feldmann, F. and Rott, N. Untersuchungen an Verdichtungsstoefen und Grenzschichten in Schnell bewegten gasen. Institute for Aerodynamics, E.T.H., Zürich, No. 10; A.R.C. 10044 (1946).Google Scholar
41. Liepmann, H. W. The Interaction between Boundary Layer and Shock Waves in Transonic Flow. J.Ae.Sc., Vol. 13, p. 623 (1946).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. Pearcey, H. H. and Beavan, J. A. Force and Pressure Coefficients up to Mach Number 0.87 on the Goldstein Roof Top Section 1442/1547. A.R.C. 9585 (1945).Google Scholar
43. Rogers, E. W. E. and White, C. Force and Pressure Measurements up to Mach Number 0.88 on a 10 per cent, thick Modified N.A.C.A. 16 series Propeller Section. A.R.C. 11114 (1946).Google Scholar
44. Beavan, J. A., Rogers, E. W. E. and Cartwright, R. High Speed Wind Tunnel Tests on an Aerofoil with and without Two-dimensional Bulges. (A.R.C. report—to be published shortly.)Google Scholar
45. Shaw, R. A. Changes in Control Characteristics with Changes in Flow Pattern at High Subsonic Speeds. Tests on an E.C. 1250 Aerofoil with 25 per cent. Concave Control Flap. A.R.C. 11933 (1948).Google Scholar
46. Shaw, R. A. Adhesion of Flow beyond the Shock Stall on an E.C. 1250 Aerofoil with 25 per cent. Concave Control Flap. Further Tests with Turbulent Boundary Layer. A.R.C. 12284 (1949).Google Scholar
47. Holder, D. W. and North, R. J. An Oscillatory Flow resulting from the Interaction of Shock-waves the Boundary-layer on a Rigid Aerofoil. A.R.C. 12400 (1949).Google Scholar
48. Hilton, W. F. Subsonic and Supersonic Tests on a 7½ per cent. Biconvex Aerofoil. R. & M. 2196 (1944).Google Scholar
49. Hilton, W. F. and Pruden, F. W. Subsonic and Supersonic High Speed Tunnel tests of a faired double wedge aerofoil. R. & M. 2057 (1944).Google Scholar
50. Pruden, F. W. Tests of a double wedge aerofoil with a 30 per cent, control flap over a range of supersonic speeds. R. & M. 2197 (1946).Google Scholar
51. Pruden, F. W. Tests on an aerofoil with a 40 per cent, hinged flap at supersonic speed. A.R.C. 7615 (1944).Google Scholar
52. Pruden, F. W. Tests of a Two-dimensional supersonic aerofoil with a spoiler control. A.R.C. 9203 (1945).Google Scholar
53. Hilton, W. F. Force coefficients on round-nosed aerofoils at supersonic speeds. A.R.C. 9756 (1946).Google Scholar
54. Jones, W. P. The Influence of Thickness/ chord Ratio on Supersonic Derivatives for Oscillating Aerofoils. A.R.C. 10871 (1947).Google Scholar
55. Singham, J. R., Pruden, F. W. and Tomlinson, R. C. Tests on a working model ram jet in a supersonic wind tunnel. A.R.C. 11361 (1947).Google Scholar
56. Beavan, J. A., Sargent, R. F. and Burrows, P. M. Measurements of Maximum Lift on 19 Aerofoil Sections at High Mach Numbers. A.R.C. 11084 (1947).Google Scholar
57. North, R. J. and Burrows, P. M. Measurements of the Maximum Lift of a further 7 Aerofoils at High Mach Number. A.R.C. 11191 (1948).Google Scholar
58. Lock, C. N. H. and Fowler, R. G. Yaw and Sweepback at High Mach Number. A.R.C. 8718 (1945).Google Scholar
59. Beavan, J. A. and Bumstead, N. Tests on Yawed Aerofoils in the 20 x 8 in. High-Speed Tunnel. R. & M. 2458 (1947).Google Scholar
60. Beavan, J. A., Hyde, G. A. M. and Fowler, R. G. Pressure and Wake Measurements up to Mach Number 0.85 on an E.C. 1250 Section with 25 per cent. Control. R. & M. 2065 (1945).Google Scholar
61. Pearcey, H. H. The Effect of the Condensation of Atmospheric Water Vapour on Total Head and other Measurements in the N.P.L. High-Speed Tunnels. R. & M. 2249 (1944).Google Scholar
62. Fage, A. and Sargent, R. F. The Effect on Aerofoil Drag of Boundary-layer Suction Behind a Shock Wave. R. & M. 1913 (1943).Google Scholar
63. Pearcey, H. H. and Rogers, E. W. E. The Effect of Compressibility on the Performance of a Griffith Aerofoil. A.R.C. 10096 (1947).Google Scholar