Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:53:40.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Past and future progress in fixed and rotary wing aeroelasticity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

G. T. S. Done
G. T. S. Done*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and AeronauticsCity University, London, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Progress in aeroelasticity of fixed and rotary wing aircraft is compared by means of a selective review. Discussion of the role of concurrent engineering leads into modelling and validation, these being dealt with under the headings of aerodynamics, structural and integrated models. Formulation and solution of equations of motion are considered, which relate mainly to rotorcraft, and then aeroelastic performance improvement is covered. This includes optimisation, aeroservoelasticity and passive devices. Basic insight providing models are reviewed and the paper concludes with, further comments on insight, and also future progress in aeroelasticity.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 100 , Issue 997 , September 1996 , pp. 269 - 280
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1996 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Olsen, J.J. Preface to Aeroelastic Considerations in the Preliminary Design of Aircraft, 1983.Google Scholar
2. Syan, C.S. and Menon, U. Concurrent Engineering. Concepts, Im plementation and Practice, 1994.Google Scholar
3. Collar, A.R. The expanding domain of aeroelasticity, Aeronaut J, 1946, 50, pp 613–636.Google Scholar
4. Collar, A.R. Aeroelasticity - retrospect and prospect, Aeronaut J, 1959, 63, pp 1–15.Google Scholar
5. Hitch, H.P.Y. Modern methods of investigating flutter and vibration Aeronaut J, 1964, 68, pp 357–373.Google Scholar
6. Hafner, R. The domain of the helicopter, Aeronaut J, 1954, 58, pp 663–702.Google Scholar
7. Loewy, R.G. Review of rotary-wing V/Stol dynamic and aero-elastic problems, J Amer Heli Soc, 1969, pp 3–23.Google Scholar
8. Friedmann, P.P. Recent trends in rotary-wing aeroelasticity, Vertica, 1987, 11(1/2) pp 139–170.Google Scholar
9. Chopra, I. Perspectives in aero-mechanical stability of helicopter rotors, Vertica, 1990, 14 (4), pp 457–508.Google Scholar
10. Zimmermann, H. The aeroelastic challenge of the airbus family - re view and prospects, Int Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, 1991, pp 1-11.Google Scholar
11. Edwards, J.W. Technical evaluation report on 1991 specialists meeting on Transonic unsteady aerodynamics and aeroelasticity, AGARD CP-507 73rd Mtg AGARD S & M Panel on Transonic Unsteady Aerodynamics and Aeroelasticity 1991.Google Scholar
12. Edwards, J.W. and Malone, J.B. Current status of computational methods for transonic unsteady aerodynamics and aeroelastic appli cations, Paper 1, AGARD CP-507 73rd Mtg AGARD S & M Panel on Transonic unsteady aerodynamics and aeroelasticity, 1991.Google Scholar
13. Whitlow, W. Research in unsteady aerodynamics and computation al aeroelasticity at the NASA Langley Research Center, Int Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, 1993, pp 581-593.Google Scholar
14. Beesten, B.M.J, and Seelhorst, U. Vortex structure investigation by LDV for two rotor blade tips in forward flight, 20th European Rotorcraft Forum, Amsterdam, 1994, Paper 13.Google Scholar
15. Coton, F.N., Moreno, F.de la I., Galbraith, R.A.MCD. and Horner, M.B. A three-dimensional model of low speed blade-vortex interaction, 20th European Rotorcraft Forum, Amsterdam, 1994, Paper 18.Google Scholar
16. Richter, P. and Schreiber, T. Theoretical investigations and windtunnel tests with HHC-IBC, 20th European Rotorcraft Forum, Amsterdam, 1994 Paper 72.Google Scholar
17. Srinivasan, G.R., Raghavan, V., Duque, E.P.N, and Mccroskey, W.J. Flowfield analysis of modern helicopter rotors inhover by Navier-Stokes method, J Amer Heli Soc, 1993, 38, (3), pp 3–13.Google Scholar
18. Kirsten, T.J. Preliminary three-dimensional CFD model of a heli copter fuselage, 20th European Rotorcraft Forum, Amsterdam, 1994, Paper 26.Google Scholar
19. Davis, S.S. and Chang, J-C. The critical role of computational fluid dynamics in rotary-wing aerodynamics, Vertica, 1987, 11, (1/2), pp 43–63.Google Scholar
20. Petian, C. Aeroelasticity and structural vibrations - state of the art and trends, Int Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Strasbourg, 1993, pp 1-23.Google Scholar
21. Niedbal, N. Real and complex exciter forces for experimental modal analysis - a simulation study, Int Forum on Aero - elasticity and Structural Dynamics, Strasbourg , 1993, pp 803-820.Google Scholar
22. Seyffarth, K., Lacabanne, M., Konig, K. and Cassan, H. Comfort in turbulence for a large civil transport aircraft, Int Forum on Aero elasticity and Structural Dynamics, Strasbourg, 1993, pp 151–170.Google Scholar
23. Jones, D.I.G. Recent advances in structural damping, 3rd Int Conf on Recent Advances in Structural Dynamics, Southampton, 1988, pp 409-428.Google Scholar
24. Mazet, M., Barreau, R., Guilband, M. A fluid-structure direct coupling method for static and dynamic calculations around aircraft wings, Int Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Stras bourg, 1993, pp 427-445.Google Scholar
25. Ormiston, R.A., Ruzicka, G.C., Tan, CM., and Rutkowski, M.J. First level release of 2GCHAS for comprehensive helicopter analy sis, 7th European Rotorcraft Forum, Berlin, 1991.Google Scholar
26. Hansford, R.E. Considerations in the development of the coupled rotor-fuselage model, J Amer Heli Soc, 1994, 39, (4), pp 70–81.Google Scholar
27. Done, G.T.S., Juggins, P.T.W. and Patel, M.H. Further experience with a new approach to helicopter aeroelasticity, Vertica, 1988, 2, (4) pp 357–369.Google Scholar
28. Zimmermann, H., Vogel, S, Henke, H., and Schulze, B. Computation of flutter boundaries in the time and frequency domain, Paper 17, AGARD CP-507, 73rd Mtg AGARD, S & M Panel on ‘Transon ic Unsteady Aerodynamics and Aeroelasticity, San Diego, 7-11 Oct 1991 Google Scholar
29. Ashley, H. Aeronautical uses of optimization, J Aircraft, 1982, 19, (l),pp5–28.Google Scholar
30. Shirk, M.H., Hertz, T.J. and Weisshaar, T. Aeroelastic tailoring - theory, practice and promise, J Aircr, 1986, 23, (1), pp 6–18.Google Scholar
31. Schweiger, J., Lotze, A. and Sensburg, O. The influence of mathe matical optimization methods on the design of aircraft structures, Euro Forum on Aero-elasticity and Structural Dynamics, Aachen, 1989; pp 375-383.Google Scholar
32. Petain, C. Structural optimization of aircrafts practice and trends, 17th Congress of ICAS, Stockholm, 1990, pp 210-221.Google Scholar
33. Godel, H. Recent developments in structural optimization with re spect to dynamic and aero-elasticity problems, Int Forum on Aero elasticity and Structural Dynamics, Aachen, 1991, pp 354-363.Google Scholar
34. Friedmann, P. Application of modern structural optimization to vi bration reduction in rotorcraft, Vertica, 1985, 9, (4), pp 363–376.Google Scholar
35. Friedmann, P.P. Helicopter vibration reduction using structural opti mization with aeroelastic/multidisciplinary constraints - a survey, J Aircraft, 1991, 23, (1), pp 8–21.Google Scholar
36. Miura, A. Applications of modern structural optimization to vibra tion reduction in rotorcraft, 1985, Vertica, 1985, 9, (4), pp 141–154.Google Scholar
37. Adelman, H.M. and Mantay, W.R. Integrated multidisciplinary de sign optimization of rotorcraft, J Aircr, 1991, 28, (1), pp 22–28.Google Scholar
38. Chattopadhyay, A., Walsh, J.L. and Riley, M. Integrated aerody namic/dynamic optimization of helicopter rotor blades, AIAA, 1988, Paper 89-1269.Google Scholar
39. Climent, H. and Johnson, E.H. Aeroelastic optimization using MSC/NASTRAN, Proc. Int. Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Strasbourg, 1993, pp 1097-1116.Google Scholar
40. Parks, P.C. Flutter of an aircraft controlled by an automatic navigation system, Aeronaut J, 1961, 65, pp 267–272.Google Scholar
41. Felt, L.R., Huttsell, L.J., Noll, T.E. and Cooley, D.E. Aeroser- voelastic encounters, J Aircr, 1979, 16, (7), pp 477–483.Google Scholar
42. Zimmermann, H. Aeroservoelasticity, 2nd World Congress on Computational Mechanics, Stuttgart, 1990, pp 719-735 and 27-31.Google Scholar
43. Noll, T.E. Aeroservoelasticity, AIAA Paper 90-1073 AIAA/ASME /ASCE/AHS/ASC 31st Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materi als Conference, Long Beach, 1990.Google Scholar
44. Friedmann, P.P. Rotary-wing aeroservoelastic problems, Int Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Aachen, 1991, pp 481- 495.Google Scholar
45. Dehmel, W. and Koenig, K. Damping augmentation functions of a civil aircraft, Int Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Aachen, 1991, pp 454-463.Google Scholar
46. Staple, A.E. and Wells, D.M. The development and testing of an active control of structural response system for the EH101 heli copter, Paper I1I.6.2 16th Euro. Rotorcraft Forum, Glasgow, 1990 Google Scholar
47. Reichert, G. Helicopter vibration control - a survey, Vertica, 1987, 5,(1),pp1–20.Google Scholar
48. Done, G.T.S. Advances in helicopter vibration control, Shock and Vibration Digest, 1989, 21, (11), pp 15–18.Google Scholar
49. Done, G.T.S. The flutter and stability of undamped systems, ARC Reports and Memoranda No.3553, HMSO, 1968.Google Scholar
50. Done, G.T.S. A study of binary flutter roots using a method of sys tem synthesis, ARC Reports and Memoranda No 3554, HMSO, 1969.Google Scholar
51. Broadbent, E.G. Elements of aeroelasticity, Aeronaut Eng, 1954, 26. (Series of papers also published as a monograph The elementary theory of aeroelasticity, Bunhill Publications).Google Scholar
52. Hancock, G.J., Wright, J.R. AND Simpson, A. On the teaching of the principles of wing flexure-torsion flutter, Aeronaut J, 1985, 89, (888), pp 285-305.Google Scholar
53. Niblett, L.T. A guide to classical flutter, Aeronaut J, 1988, 92, (91), pp 339-354.Google Scholar
54. Done, G.T.S. A simplified approach to helicopter ground resonance, Aeronaut J, 1974, 78, pp 204-208.Google Scholar
55. Done, G.T.S. Relative energy concepts in helicopter dynamics, Amer Helicopter Soc Int Technical Specialists Mtg on Rotorcraft Basic Research, Atlanta, 1991.Google Scholar
56. Done, G.T.S. and Simpson, A. Dynamic instability of certain conser vative and non-conservative systems, J Mech Eng Sci, 1977, 19, (6), pp 251-263.Google Scholar
57. Done, G.T.S. and Hughes, A.D. The response of a vibrating struc ture as a function of structural parameters, J Sound Vib, 1975, 38, (2), pp 255-266.Google Scholar
58. Done, G.T.S. and Rangacharyulu, M.A.V. Use of optimization in helicopter vibration control by structural modification, J Sound Vib, 1981,74, (4), pp 507-518.Google Scholar