Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:05:01.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the use of large scale windtunnel models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

A. Giacchetto
A. Giacchetto*
Affiliation:
Onera Modane-Avrieux, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The use of large scale windtunnel models offers considerable advantages to an experimenter

  • 1. the possibility of obtaining high Reynolds number, certainly significant and sometimes equal to that in flight, for moderate stagnation pressures

  • 2. an accurate representation of geometric elements, i.e. good form similitude (it is necessary to emphasise the importance of being very thorough in this area)

  • 3. large internal volumes which enable numerous transducers to be implanted, ambitious experimental devices and means of remote control of model motorisation

  • 4. test conditions remain those corresponding to industrial manufacturing methods and so avoid problems related to extreme miniaturisation.

Additionally, there exist some test conditions for which scale reduction is limited or even impossible; for example, because of physical phenomena, limitation in industrial methods of miniaturisation, or quite simply because the subject is itself the flying object. These conditions are applicable to all tests whether industrial or research. They are especially true for industrial tests where these concern important decisions. They are also true for research tests whenever they need to be sufficiently close to flight reality. Wind-tunnels are always a means to reduce the costs and risks of aeronautical project developments. The risk taken in extrapolating from windtunnel tests to flight are lower when the test is more realistic and this gives a clear advantage to tests on large sized models.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 101 , Issue 1009 , November 1997 , pp. 429 - 437
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Rebuffet, P. Aérodynamique expérimentale, Tome 1. § 25602.Google Scholar
2. Charpin, F. and Prieur, J. Large scale icing tests in the ONERA S1MA windtunnel. Current capabilities and planned improvements, 19th AIAA Advanced Measurement and Ground Testing Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA, 18–20 June 1996.Google Scholar
3. Stojanowsk, M. and Massonnat, J.M. Essais d'un parafoil dans la soufflerie S1MA de l'ONERA, 33ème colloque d'Aérodynamique Appliquée, Aérodynamique des basses vitesses organisé par l'Association Aéionautique et Astronautique (AAAF), Poitiers, France, 24–26 March 1997.Google Scholar
4. Rebuffet, P. Aérodynamique expérimentale, Tome 1. § 22354 and § 22941.Google Scholar
5. Triapkine, V., Bec, R. and Gauthier, J. Essais en soufflerie de maquettes d'Ariane IV, 23ème colloque d'Aérodynamique appliquée, Aussois, France, 12–14 November 1986.Google Scholar
6. Coste, J. Windtunnel simulation of the firing of missiles carried under aircraft, Symposium AGARD/FMP Missile system flight mechanics, London, 21–24 May 1979.Google Scholar
7. Raffin, J.C., Remandet, J.N. and Rondeau, D. Nouveau système de trajectographie captive pour la grande soufflerie sonique S1MA de l'ONERA, 76th AGARD FDP Symposium Aerodynamic of store integration, Ankara, 24–27 April 1995.Google Scholar