Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:57:38.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanics and aerodynamics of perching manoeuvres in a large bird of prey

Part of: Smart Aircraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

A. C. Carruthers ,
A. L. R. Thomas ,
S. M. Walker  and
G. K. Taylor
A. C. Carruthers
Affiliation:
[email protected]
A. L. R. Thomas
Affiliation:
[email protected], Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
S. M. Walker
Affiliation:
[email protected], Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
G. K. Taylor
Affiliation:
[email protected], Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reviews recent results on the mechanics and aerodynamics of perching in a large bird of prey, the Steppe Eagle Aquila nipalensis. Data collected using onboard and high-speed video cameras are used to examine gross morphing of the wing planform by the flight muscles, and smaller-scale morphing of the wing profile by aeroelastic deflection of the feathers, Carruthers et al. High-resolution still images are used to reconstruct the shape of the wing using multi-station photogrammetry, and the performance of the measured wing profile is analysed using a panel code, Carruthers et al. In bringing these lines of research together, we examine the role of aeroelastic feather deflection, and show that the key to perching in birds lies not in high-lift aerodynamics, but in the way in which the wings and tail morph to allow the bird to transition quickly from a steady glide into a deep stall.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 114 , Issue 1161 , November 2010 , pp. 673 - 680
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Carruthers, A.C., Thomas, A.L.R. and Taylor, G.K.. Automatic aeroelastic devices in the wings of a Steppe Eagle Aquila nipalensis, J Exp Biol, 2007, 210, pp 4136–4139.Google Scholar
2. Carruthers, A.C., Walker, S.W., Thomas, A.L.R. and Taylor, G.K.. Aerodynamics of aerofoil sections measured on a free-flying bird, Proc IME G, J Aero Eng, 2010, 224, (8), pp 855–864.Google Scholar
3. Atkinson, K.B., Close Range Photogrammetry and Machine Vision, Reinhold, New York, NY, USA, 1996.Google Scholar
4. Selig, M.S. and Guglielmo, J.J.. High-lift low Reynolds number airfoil design, J Aircr, 1997, 34, (1), pp 72–79.Google Scholar
5. Marchman, J.F. and Werme, T.D.. Clark-Y airfoil performance at low Reynolds numbers, AIAA-84-0052, AIAA 22nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, USA, 9-12 January 1984.Google Scholar
6. Selig, M.S., Guglielmo, J.J., Broeren, A.P. and Giguere, P., Summary of Low-Speed Airfoil Data – Volume 1, SoarTech Aero Publications, Virginia Beach, VA, 23451, USA, 1995, http://www.soartech-aero.com/.Google Scholar
7. Lyon, C.A., Broeren, A.P., Giguere, P., Gopalarathnam, A. and Selig, M.S.. Summary of Low-Speed Airfoil Data, 3, SoarTech Aero Publications, Virginia Beach, VA, 23451, USA, 1997, http://www.soartech-aero.com/.Google Scholar
8. Simons, M., Model Aircraft Aerodynamics, 3rd ed, Argus Books, Hemel Hempstead, UK, 1994.Google Scholar