Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:30:10.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low-velocity impact response of sandwich cylindrical panels with nanotube-reinforced and metal face sheet in thermal environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2018

M. R. Bayat*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical EngineeringCollege of EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehran, Iran
M. Mosavi Mashhadi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical EngineeringCollege of EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehran, Iran
O. Rahmani
Affiliation:
Smart Structures and New Advanced Materials LaboratoryDepartment of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of ZanjanZanjan, Iran

Abstract

Employing an analytical method, non-linear low-velocity impact response of carbon nanotube (CNT)-reinforced sandwich cylindrical panels in thermal environments is analysed. Two types of core (i.e. homogenous and functionally graded) are considered for sandwich panels. The face sheets of sandwich panels are multi-layer which consist of CNT-reinforced composite (CNTRC) and metal layers. Micromechanical models are used to estimate the material properties of CNTRCs. A higher-order shear deformation theory with a von Kármán-type of kinematic non-linearity provides the equations of motion. Temperature-dependent material properties are used to include the thermal effects. The equations of motion are solved using a two-step perturbation technique. Existing numerical results in the literature are used to validate the present method. The effect of nanotube volume fraction, material property gradient, impactor initial velocity, geometrical parameters of cylindrical panel, temperature change and edge boundary condition on the impact response of cylindrical panel structures is discussed. The quantitative results and analytical formulations can be helpful in better designing of CNTRC structures subjected to low-velocity impact in thermal environments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Royal Aeronautical Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Coleman, J.N., Khan, U., Blau, W.J. and Gun’ko, Y.K. Small but strong: a review of the mechanical properties of carbon nanotube–polymer composites, Carbon (New York), 2006, 44, pp 1624–1652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.02.038.Google Scholar
2. Qian, D., Dickey, E., Andrews, R. and Rantell, T. Load transfer and deformation mechanisms in carbon nanotube–polystyrene composites, Applied Physics Letters, 2000, 2868, pp 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.126500.Google Scholar
3. Haider, M.F., Majumdar, P.K., Angeloni, S. and Reifsnider, K.L. Nonlinear anisotropic electrical response of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites, J Composite Material, 2018, 52, 1017--1032.Google Scholar
4. Han, Y. and Elliott, J. Molecular dynamics simulations of the elastic properties of polymer/carbon nanotube composites, Computer Materials Science, 2007, 39, pp 315323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2006.06.011.Google Scholar
5. Bonnet, P., Sireude, D., Garnier, B. and Chauvet, O. Thermal properties and percolation in carbon nanotube–polymer composites, Applied Physics Letters, 2007, 91, pp 14. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2813625.Google Scholar
6. Meguid, S.A. and Sun, Y. On the tensile and shear strength of nano-reinforced composite interfaces, Material Design, 2004, 25, pp 289296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2003.10.018.Google Scholar
7. Shen, H.S. Nonlinear bending of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced composite plates in thermal environments, Composite Structures, 2009, 91, pp 919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.04.026.Google Scholar
8. Kwon, H., Bradbury, C.R. and Leparoux, M. Fabrication of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced aluminum matrix composite, Advanced Engineering Materials, 2011, 13, pp 325329. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201000251.Google Scholar
9. Shen, H.S. and Xiang, Y. Nonlinear vibration of nanotube-reinforced composite cylindrical panels resting on elastic foundations in thermal environments, Composite Structures, 2015, 49, pp 4959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2014.06.007.Google Scholar
10. Davalos, J.F., Qiao, P., Frank Xu, X., Robinson, J. and Barth, K.E. Modeling and characterization of fiber-reinforced plastic honeycomb sandwich panels for highway bridge applications, Composite Structures, 2001, 52, pp 441452. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(01)00034-4.Google Scholar
11. Apetre, N.A., Sankar, B.V. and Ambur, D.R. Low-velocity impact response of sandwich beams with functionally graded core, Int J Solids Structures, 2006, 43, pp 24792496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.003.Google Scholar
12. Miyamoto, R.G.F.Y., Kaysser, W.A., Rabin, B.H. and Kawasaki, A. Functionally Graded Materials: Design, Processing and Applications, Springer Science & Business Media, New York, US, 2013.Google Scholar
13. Venkataraman, S. and Sankar, B.V. Elasticity solution for stresses in a sandwich beam with functionally graded core, AIAA J, 2003, 41, pp 25012505. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.6853.Google Scholar
14. Vlot, A.D. and Gunnink, J.W. Fibre Metal Laminates: An Introduction, Springer Science & Business Media, New York, US, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0995-9.Google Scholar
15. Vermeeren, C.A.J.R. An historic overview of the development of fibre metal laminates, Appl Compos Mater, 2003, 10, pp 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025533701806.Google Scholar
16. Roebroeks, G. Fibre–metal laminates: recent developments and applications, Int J Fatigue, 1994, 16, pp 3342. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(94)90443-X.Google Scholar
17. Vlot, A. and Krull, M. Impact damage resistance of various fibre metal laminates, Le J Physique, 1997, IV. 7, pp C3--1045.Google Scholar
18. Tan, C.Y. and Akil, H.M. Impact response of fiber metal laminate sandwich composite structure with polypropylene honeycomb core, Composites Part B: Engineering, 2012, 43, pp 14331438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.036.Google Scholar
19. Aktaş, M., Atas, C., İçten, B.M. and Karakuzu, R. An experimental investigation of the impact response of composite laminates, Composites Structures, 2009, 87, pp 307313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.02.003.Google Scholar
20. Salami, S.J. Low velocity impact response of sandwich beams with soft cores and carbon nanotube reinforced face sheets based on extended high order sandwich panel theory, Aerospace Science Technol, 2017.Google Scholar
21. Wang, J., Waas, A.M. and Wang, H. Experimental and numerical study on the low-velocity impact behavior of foam-core sandwich panels, Composites Structures, 2013, 96, pp 298311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.002.Google Scholar
22. Jam, J.E. and Kiani, Y. Low velocity impact response of functionally graded carbon nanotube reinforced composite beams in thermal environment, Composites Structures, 2015, 132, pp 3543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.04.045.Google Scholar
23. Wang, Z.X., Xu, J. and Qiao, P. Nonlinear low-velocity impact analysis of temperature-dependent nanotube-reinforced composite plates, Composites Structures, 2014, 108, pp 423434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.09.024.Google Scholar
24. Kiratisaevee, H. Low-velocity impact response of high-performance aluminum foam sandwich structures, J Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 2005, 24, pp 10571072. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684405048205.Google Scholar
25. Meo, M., Vignjevic, R. and Marengo, G. The response of honeycomb sandwich panels under low-velocity impact loading, Int J Mechanical Sciences, 2005, 47, pp 13011325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.05.006.Google Scholar
26. Reddy, J.N.N. A refined nonlinear theory of plates with transverse shear deformation, Int J Solids Structures, 1984, 20, pp 881–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(84)90056-8.Google Scholar
27. Huishen, S. Kármán-type equations for a higher-order shear deformation plate theory and its use in the thermal postbuckling analysis, Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 1997, 18, pp 615621.Google Scholar
28. Reddy, J.N. and Liu, C.F. A higher-order shear deformation theory of laminated elastic shells, International Journal of Engineering Science 1985, 23, pp 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7225(85)90051-5.Google Scholar
29. Shen, H.S. Postbuckling of nanotube-reinforced composite cylindrical shells in thermal environments, Part II: pressure-loaded shells, Composites Structures, 2011, 93, pp 20962108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.02.011.Google Scholar
30. Shen, H.S. Postbuckling of nanotube-reinforced composite cylindrical shells in thermal environments, Part II: pressure-loaded shells, Composites Structures, 2011, 93, pp 24962503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.04.005.Google Scholar
31. Navarro, P., Marguet, S., Ferrero, J.-F., Barrau, J.-J. and Lemaire, S. Modeling of impacts on sandwich structures, Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 2012, 19, pp 523529. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2011.556841.Google Scholar
32. Abrate, S. Localized impact on sandwich structures with laminated facings, Applied Mechanics Review, 1997, 50, pp 69. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3101689.Google Scholar
33. Karas, K. Platten unter seitlichem Stoss, Ingenieur-Archive, 1939, 10, pp 237250.Google Scholar
34. Wu, H.-Y.T. and Fu-Kuo, C. Transient dynamic analysis of laminated composite plates subjected to transverse impact, Computer & Structures, 1989, 31, pp 453466. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(89)90393-3.Google Scholar
35. Khalili, S.M.R., Malekzadeh, K. and Gorgabad, A.V. Low velocity transverse impact response of functionally graded plates with temperature dependent properties, Composites Structures, 2013, 96, pp 6474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.07.035.Google Scholar
36. Wu, H.-Y.T. Impact induced stresses, strains, and delaminations in composite plates, J of Composite Materials, 1988, 22, pp 533560.Google Scholar
37. Shen, H.-S. and Zhang, C.-L. Thermal buckling and postbuckling behavior of functionally graded carbon nanotube-reinforced composite plates, Material Design, 2010, 31, pp 34033411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.048.Google Scholar
38. Richard, A.T., Smalley, E., Colbert, D.T., Guo, T., Rinzler, A.G. and Nikolaev, P. Method of making ropes of single-wall carbon nanotubes, 2001.Google Scholar
39. Barron, R.F. and Barron, B.R. Design for Thermal Stresses, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, US, 2012.Google Scholar
40. Song, Y.S. and Youn, J.R. Modeling of effective elastic properties for polymer based carbon nanotube composites, Polymer (Guildford), 2006, 47, pp 1741–1748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2006.01.013.Google Scholar
41. Bayat, M.R., Rahmani, O. and Mashhadi, M.M. Nonlinear low-velocity impact analysis of functionally graded nanotube-reinforced composite cylindrical shells in thermal environments, Polymers Composites, 2018, 730–45, pp 116. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.Google Scholar
42. Reddy, J.N. and Chin, C.D. Thermomechanical analysis of functionally graded cylinders and plates, J Thermal Stresses, 1998, 21, pp 37–41.Google Scholar
43. Shen, H.-S. and Xiang, Y. Nonlinear vibration of nanotube-reinforced composite cylindrical shells in thermal environments, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 213–216, pp 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2011.11.025.Google Scholar