Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:45:25.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigation of the flowfield induced by simulated battle damage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2017

Mathew. T. Almond ,
Peter M. Render ,
A. Duncan Walker  and
A. Howlett
Mathew. T. Almond*
Affiliation:
Loughborough University, Aeronautical & Automotive Engineering Department, Loughborough, United Kingdom
Peter M. Render
Affiliation:
Loughborough University, Aeronautical & Automotive Engineering Department, Loughborough, United Kingdom
A. Duncan Walker
Affiliation:
Loughborough University, Aeronautical & Automotive Engineering Department, Loughborough, United Kingdom
A. Howlett
Affiliation:
Loughborough University, Aeronautical & Automotive Engineering Department, Loughborough, United Kingdom
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) has been used to study the complex flowfield created by simulated battle damage to a two-dimensional wing. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) predictions have also been used for validation of internal cavity flow. Two damage cases were selected for the study; both cases were simulated using a single hole with diameters equal to 20% and 40% of the chord, located at the wing half-chord. Wind-tunnel tests were conducted at a Reynolds number of 500,000 over a range of incidences from 0 to 10° with two-component PIV measurements made on three chordwise and three spanwise planes. The PIV data were analysed and compared to CFD data of the same damage cases. The PIV data have shown lower velocity ratios and lower vorticity in the jet compared to past Jet in Cross-Flow experiments and CFD was used to describe the flow features inside the cavity of the wing. It was seen that the wing cavity has large effects on the external flow features, particularly for the 20% damage case. Finally, the flow field data have been related to force balance data. At higher incidence angles, the larger force coefficient increments in both lift and drag can be attributed to the larger wakes and higher jet strengths.

Keywords

Aerodynamicsbattle damageparticle image velocimetry (PIV)
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 121 , Issue 1243 , September 2017 , pp. 1296 - 1318
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hayes, C. Effects of simulated wing damage on the aerodynamic characteristics of a swept wing model, Tech Rep, TMX-1550, 1968, NASA, US.Google Scholar
2. Irwin, A. J. Investigation into the Aerodynamic Effects of Simulated Battle Damage to a Wing, Thesis, 1999, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.Google Scholar
3. Irwin, A. J. and Render, P. M. The influence of mid-chord battle damage on the aerodynamic characteristics of two-dimensional wings, Aeronautical J, 2000, pp 153-161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Mani, M. and Render, P.M. Experimental investigation into the aerodynamic characteristics of aerofoils with triangular and star shaped through damage, Proceedings of the 23rd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA-2005-4978, 2005, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Robinson, K.W. and Leishman, J.G. Effects of ballistic damage on the aerodynamics of helicopter rotor airfoils, J Aircr, 1998, 35, (5), pp 695-703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Samaad-Suhaeb, M. Aerodynamics of Battle Damaged Finite Aspect Ratio Wings, Thesis, 2008, Loughborough University.Google Scholar
7. Djellal, S. and Ouibrahim, A. Aerodynamic performances of battle-damaged and repaired wings of an aircraft model, J Aircr, 2008, 45, (6), pp 2009-2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Kelso, R.M., Lim, T.T. and Perry, A.E. An experimental study of round jets in crossflow, J Fluid Mech, 1996, 306, pp 111-144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Pickhaver, T.W. and Render, P.M. A technique to predict the aerodynamic effects of battle damage on an aircrafts wing, Aeronautical J, 2015, 119, (1218), pp 937-960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Irwin, A.J. and Render, P.M. The influence of simulated missile warhead fragment damage on the aerodynamic characteristics of two-dimensional wings, Aeronautical J, 2013, 117, (1194), pp 823-837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Yang, Z., Samaad-Suhaeb, M. and Render, P.M. Computational study of a battle damaged finite aspect ratio wing, Proceedings of the 30th Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2012, AIAA, New Orleans, Louisiana.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Saeedi, M., Ajalli, F. and Mani, M. A comprehensive numerical study of battle damage and repairs upon the aerodynamic characteristics of an aerofoil, The Aeronautical J, 2010, 114, (1158), pp 469-483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Bou-Mosleh, C. and Patel, S. CFD based aerodynamic analysis of damaged delta wings, ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 2014, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Render, P.M. and Pickhaver, T.W. The influence of hole orientation on the aerodynamics of battle damaged wings, Proceedings of the 30th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2012, New Orleans, Louisiana, US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Doligalski, T.L., Smith, C.R. and Walker, J.D.A. Vortex interactions with walls, Annual Review Fluid Mech, 1994, 26, pp 573-616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Mahesh, K. The interaction of jets with crossflow, Annual Review Fluid Mech, 2013, pp 379-407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Cortelezzi, L. and Karagozian, A.R. On the formation of the counter-rotating vortex pair in transverse jets, J Fluid Mech, 2001, 446, pp 347-373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Marzouk, Y.M. and Ghoniem, A.F. Vorticity structure and evolution in a transverse jet, J Fluid Mech, 2007, 575, pp 267-305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Gopalan, B.M., Abraham, M. and Katz, J. The structure of a jet in cross flow at low velocity ratios, Physics of Fluids, 2004, 16, (6), pp 2067-2087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Almond, M.T., Render, P.M. and Walker, A.D. Analysis of single hole simulated battle damage on a wing using particle image velocimetry, Proceedings of the 33rd Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2015, Dallas, Texas, US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Ki-Young, L. The flow field structure of jet-in-cross flow through the perforated damage hole, J the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 2014, 17, pp 551-559.Google Scholar
22. Pickhaver, T.W. Prediction and Validation of the Aerodynamic Effect of Simulated Battle Damage on Aircraft Wings, Thesis, 2014, Loughborough University Thesis, Loughborough, UK.Google Scholar
23. Hollis, D. Particle Image Velocimetry in Gas Turbine Combustor Flow Fields, Thesis, 2004, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.Google Scholar
24. Adrian, R.J. and Westerweel, J. Particle Image Velocimetry, 2011, Cambridge University Press, New York, New York, US.Google Scholar
25. Moussa, Z.M., Trischka, J.W. and Eskinazi, S. The near field in the mixing of a round jet with a cross-stream, J Fluid Mech, 1976, 80, (1), pp 49-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Coelho, S.L.V. and Hunt, J.C.R. The dynamics of the near field of strong jets in crossflows, J Fluid Mech, 1988, 200, pp 95-120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar