Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:21:06.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigation into clustering of synthetic jet actuators for flow separation control applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

S. C. Liddle
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
N. J. Wood
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Abstract

An investigation into the behaviour of clustered synthetic jet Actuators for flow-control applications is described. Experiments have been undertaken with two small-scale synthetic jet actuators in a zero-pressure gradient boundary-layer, in order to investigate the effect of configuration yaw angle and relative input signal phase. Oil-flow visualisation and hotwire anemometry techniques were used, demonstrating that changes in the downstream flow structure could be observed. Compared to a streamwise configuration, in which a symmetrical counter-rotating vortex pair was produced by the synthetic jet-boundary-layer interaction, a broader asymmetric interaction was produced in a 15° yaw configuration. Streamwise velocity contour plots, illustrating the development of the interaction downstream, over four phase angles, were presented. Significant differences in the PSD analyses of downstream streamwise velocity time histories were found, suggesting that input signal phase could influence the stability and hence effectiveness of flow structures used in flow-control applications.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2005 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Amitay, M., Smith, D.R., Kibens, V., Parekh, D.E. and Glezer, A.. Aerodynamic flow control over an unconventional airfoil using synthetic jet actuators; AIAA J, March 2001, 39, (3), pp 361370.Google Scholar
2. Pack, L.G., Schaeffler, N.W., Yao, C.S. and Seifert, A.. Active control of separation from the slat shoulder of a supercritical aerofoil, AIAA Paper, June 2002, pp 20023156.Google Scholar
3. Watson, M., Jaworski, A. J. and Wood, N.J.. A study of synthetic jets from rectangular and dual-circular orifices, Aeronaut J, 107, (1073) July 2003, pp 427434.Google Scholar
4. Smith, D.R.. Interaction of a synthetic jet with a crossflow boundary layer, AIAA J, November 2002, 40, (11), pp 22772288.Google Scholar
5. Bridges, A and Smith, D.R.. Influence of orificce orientation on a synthetic jet-boundary layer interaction, AIAA J, December 2003, 41, (12), pp 23942402.Google Scholar
6. Watson, M., Jaworski, A.J. and Wood, N.J.. Contribution to the understanding of flow interactions between multiple synthetic jets, AIAA J, 2003, 41, (4), pp 747749.Google Scholar
7. Crook, A., PhD Thesis, 2002, University of Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
8. Morgan, H.L., Experimental test results of the energy efficient transport (EET) flap-edge vortex model in the langley low-turbulence pressure tunnel, NASA TM-2002-211928, 2002.Google Scholar
9. Lockerby, D.A. and Carpenter, P.W.. Modeling and design of microjet actuators, AIAA J, February 2004, 42, (2), pp 220227.Google Scholar
10. Amitay, M. and Glezer, A.. Role of actuation frequency in controlled flow reattachment over a stalled aerofoil, AIAA J, 40, (2) February 2002, pp 209216.Google Scholar