Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:58:01.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Instability of Integral Panels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

P. C. Dunne*
Affiliation:
R.A.E. Technical College

Extract

The paper by Dr. A. H. Chilver (October 1955 Journal) purposed “ to present alternative theoretical approaches to the problem of local instability of a simple type of panel with unflanged stiffeners.”

Examination of these alternative approaches reveals that they are in fact identical and are based on the same approximate representation of the buckled form of the plate by sinusoidally varying lengthwise and transverse deflection, and of the stiffener by sinusoidally varying twist. The difference in the results obtained by Dr. Chilver is explained by the fact that whereas in the first analysis he uses plate theory correctly to express the strain energy in the stiffener, in his second analysis he omits entirely the torsion-bending energy.

Type
Technical Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Chilver, A. H. (1955). The Local Instability of a Simple Integral Panel. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, October 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Argyris, J. H. and Dunne, P. C. (1952). Handbook of Aeronautics, Vol. 1—Structural Principles and Data. Part 2—Structural Analysis. Pitman and Royal Aeronautical Society, 1952.Google Scholar
3. Kelsey, S. (1955). Instability of Integral Panels. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, October 1955.Google Scholar
4. Catchpole, E. J. (1954). The Optimum Design of Compression Surfaces having Unflanged Integral StifFeners. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. 58. No. 527, p. 765, November 1954.Google Scholar