Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:56:51.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Handling qualities of aircraft with stabilty and control augmentation systems—a fundamental approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. Hodgkinson ,
W. J. LaManna  and
J. L. Heyde
J. Hodgkinson
Affiliation:
McDonnell Aircraft Company
W. J. LaManna
Affiliation:
McDonnell Aircraft Company
J. L. Heyde
Affiliation:
McDonnell Aircraft Company
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Increasingly stringent operational demands on military aircraft, together with the widening flight envelopes made possible by advances in aerodynamic, structural and propulsion technology, have forced the complication of stability and control augmentation systems (S/CAS) upon the aircraft designer. The early SAS configurations were conceived as devices to enhance the natural response characteristics of the aircraft; later, CAS evolved as a way of making the desired response more independent of the basic aircraft characteristics. Many recent examples of S/CAS are very complex, with equations of twentieth or higher order commonly being used for linear handling qualities analysis. In view of the fact that aircraft of this complexity have been part of the handling qualities picture for ten years or more, it is surprising that no widely accepted criteria for these aircraft have evolved.

Type
Technical notes
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 80 , Issue 782 , February 1976 , pp. 75 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1976 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Anon. Military specification—flying qualities of piloted airplanes. MIL-F-8785B(ASG), 7th August 1969.Google Scholar
2. Brady, C. C., Hodgkinson, J. and Wilson, R. K. The new military flying qualities specification—a valid design tool? AIAA Paper 71-766, July 1971.Google Scholar
3. Stapleford, R. L., et al. Outsmarting MIL-F-8785B (ASG), the military flying qualities specification. STI TR-190-1, August 1971.Google Scholar
4. DiFranco, D. A. In-flight investigation of the effects of higher-order control system dynamics on longitudinal handling qualities. AFFDL-TR-68-90, August 1968.Google Scholar
5. Neal, T. P. and Smith, R. E. An in-flight investigation to develop control system design criteria for fighter airplanes. AFFDL-TR-70-14, Vols I and II.Google Scholar
6. Ashkenas, I. L., Jex, H. R., McRuer, D. T. Pilot-induced oscillations: their cause and analysis. NORAIR Report NOR-64-143, July 1954.Google Scholar
7. McRuer, D. The development of pilot-in-the-loop analysis. AIAA Guidance and Control Conference, August 1972.Google Scholar
8. Arnold, J. D. An improved method of predicting aircraft longitudinal handling qualities based on the minimum plot rating concept. AF1T Thesis GGC/MA/73-1, June 1973.Google Scholar
9. Johnson, R. B. Predicting pitch task flying qualities using paper pilot. USAF Air University Thesis GGD/ MA/73-2, June 1973.Google Scholar
10. Brulle, R. V. Flying qualities evaluation using F-15 control system development simulator data. SAE Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee Meeting, September 1975, Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
11. Rosenbrock, H. H. An automatic method for finding the greatest of least value of a function. The Computer Journal, Vol 3, p 174, 1960.Google Scholar