Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:43:40.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fly-by-wire and control configured vehicles—rewards and risks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

B. R. A. Burns
B. R. A. Burns*
Affiliation:
British Aircraft Corporation Ltd, Military Aircraft Division, Warton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Many thousands of words have already been spoken and numerous papers written extolling the virtues of fly-by-wire and the control configured vehicle. Most of these issue from control system specialists and avionics engineers anxious to sell their new technology. Aircraft designers and development teams, including test pilots, must adopt a cautious approach to these new developments and ask the questions “What has it to offer?” and “What's the catch?”.

We must always balance performance rewards against development risks, ensuring that the risks are carefully evaluated and that we do not suffer from what the Americans call “Second Degree Ignorance” (we don't know what we don't know). If we can define the development problems, we are well on the way to solving them; if they remain obscure then the benefits will elude us. If the risk outweighs the reward a conservative solution must be adopted; it is this consideration that so often makes us, like Hamlet, “rather bear those ills we have, than fly to others that we know not of”.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 79 , Issue 770 , February 1975 , pp. 51 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1975 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Baldwin, R.A. Application digital fly-by-wire to fighter/attack aircraft. AGARD CP. 137, Paper 19.Google Scholar
2. Hearne, P.A. Automatic control. The new dimension in aircraft design. RAeS Lanchester Memorial Lecture 1974.Google Scholar
3. Thompson, G.O. and Kass, G.J. Active flutter prevention—an emerging technology. Journal of Aircraft, Vol 9, No 3.Google Scholar
4. Topp, L.J. Potential performance gains by use of a flutter suppression system. Paper No 7 B 3. (12th Joint Automatic Control Conference of IEEE, 1971).Google Scholar
5. Wanner, J.C. The CCV concept and specifications. ONERA TP 1282 (Translation).Google Scholar
6. Berger, R.L., Ramage, J.K., Morris, J.W. and Hunter, J.E. Survivable flight control system, active control development flight test and application. (AGARD Symposium Paris, October 1974).Google Scholar