Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:58:57.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flapping wings in line formation flight: a computational analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

M. Ghommem  and
V. M. Calo
M. Ghommem*
Affiliation:
Center for Numerical Porous Media (NumPor), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Saudi, Arabia
V. M. Calo
Affiliation:
Center for Numerical Porous Media (NumPor), Applied Mathematics & Computational Science and Earth Sciences & Engineering, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Saudi, Arabia
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The current understanding of the aerodynamics of birds in formation flights is mostly based on field observations. The interpretation of these observations is usually made using simplified aerodynamic models. Here, we investigate the aerodynamic aspects of formation flights. We use a potential flow solver based on the unsteady vortex lattice method (UVLM) to simulate the flow over flapping wings flying in grouping arrangements and in proximity of each other. UVLM has the capability to capture unsteady effects associated with the wake. We demonstrate the importance of properly capturing these effects to assess aerodynamic performance of flapping wings in formation flight. Simulations show that flying in line formation at adequate spacing enables significant increase in the lift and thrust and reduces power consumption. This is mainly due to the interaction between the trailing birds and the previously-shed wake vorticity from the leading bird. Moreover, enlarging the group of birds flying in formation further improves the aerodynamic performance for each bird in the flock. Therefore, birds get significant benefit of such organised patterns to minimise power consumption while traveling over long distances without stop and feeding. This justifies formation flight as being beneficial for bird evolution without regard to potential social benefits, such as, visual and communication factors for group protection and predator evasion.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 118 , Issue 1203 , May 2014 , pp. 485 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ballerini, M., Cabibbo, N., Candelier\R., , Cavagna, A., Cisbani, E., Giardina, I., Orlandi, A., Parisi, G., Procaccini, A., Viale, M. and Zdravkovic, V. Empirical investigation of starling flocks: a benchmark study in collective animal behaviour, Animal Behaviour, 76, 2008, pp 201–215.Google Scholar
2. Weimerskirch, H., Martin, J., Clerquin, Y. Alexandre, P. and Jiraskova, S. Energy saving in flight formation, Nature, 2001, 413, pp 697–698.Google Scholar
3. Cutts, C.J. and Speakman, J.R. Energy saving in formation flight of pink-footed geese, J Experimental Biology, 1994, 189, pp 251–261.Google Scholar
4. Spedding, G. The cost of flight in flocks, Nature, 2011, 474, pp 458–459.Google Scholar
5. Beauchamp, G. Long-distance migrating species of birds travel in larger groups, Biology Letters, 2011, 7, pp 692–694.Google Scholar
6. Hainsworth, F.R. Induced drag savings from ground effect and formation flight in brown pelicans, J Experimental Biology, 1988, 135, pp 431–444.Google Scholar
7. Lissaman, P.B.S. and Shollenberger, C.A. Formation fight of birds, Science, 1970, 168, pp 1003–1005.Google Scholar
8. Saban, D. Whidborne, J.F. and Cooke, A. Simulation of wake vortex effects for UAVs in close formation flight, Aeronaut J, 2009, 113, pp 727–738.Google Scholar
9. Hainsorth, F.R. Precision and dynamics of positioning by Canada geese flying in formation, J Experimental Biology, 1987, 128, pp 445–462.Google Scholar
10. Badgerow, J.P. and Hainsworth, F.R. Energy savings through formation flight? a re-examinationof the vee formation, J Theoretical Biology, 1981, 93, pp 41–52.Google Scholar
11. Seiler, P., Pant, A. and Hedrick, J.K. A systems interpretation for observations of bird formations, J Theoretical Biology, 2003, 221, pp 279–287.Google Scholar
12. King, R. and Gopalarathnam, A. Ideal aerodynamics of ground effect and formation flight, J Aircr, 2005, 42, pp 1188–1199.Google Scholar
13. Newton, I. The Migration Ecology of Birds, 2008, Academic Press.Google Scholar
14. Sane, S.P. and Dickinson, M.H. The aerodynamics effects of wing rotation and a revised quasi steady model of flapping flight, J Experimental Biology, 2002, 205, pp 1087–1096.Google Scholar
15. Birch, J.M. and Dickinson, M.H. The influence of wing wake interactions on the productionof aerodynamic forces in flapping flight, J Experimental Biology, 2003, 206, pp 2257–2272.Google Scholar
16. Ansari, S.A., Zbikowski, R. and Knowles, K. Aerodynamic modelling of insect-like flappingflight for micro air vehicles, Prog in Aerospace Sci, 2006, 42, pp 129–172.Google Scholar
17. Grodnitsky, D.L. and Morozov, P.P. Vortex formation during tethered flight of functionally and morphologically two-winged insects, J Experimental Biology, 1993, 182, pp 11–40.Google Scholar
18. Bramesfeld, G. and Maughmer, M.D. Effects of wake rollup on formation-flight aerodynamics, J Aircr, 2008, 45, pp 1167–1173.Google Scholar
19. Ning, A., Flanzer, T.C. and Kroo, I.M. Aerodynamic performance of extended formation flight, J Aircr, 2011, 48, pp 855–865.Google Scholar
20. Kless, J.E., Aftosmis, M.J., Ning, S.A. and Nemec, M. Inviscid analysis of extended-formation flight, AIAA J, 2013, 51, pp 1703–1715.Google Scholar
21. Giulietti, F., Innocenti, M., Napolitano, M. and Pollini, L. Dynamic and control issues of formation flight, Aerospace Sci and Tech, 2005, 9, pp 65–71.Google Scholar
22. Zou, Y., Pagilla, P.R. and Ratliff, R.T. Distributed formation flight control using constraint forces, J Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2009, 32, pp 112–120.Google Scholar
23. Blake, W. and Multhopp, D. Design, performance and modeling considerations for close formation flight, Proceedings of the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit, 1998, AIAA Paper 98-4343.Google Scholar
24. Iglesias, S. and Mason, W.H. Optimum spanloads in formation flight, 2002, AIAA Paper 2002-0258.Google Scholar
25. Willis, D.J., Peraire, J. and Breuer, K.S. A computational investigation of bio-inspired formation flight and ground effect, Proceedings of the 25th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2007, AIAA Paper 2007-4182.Google Scholar
26. Helbing, D. and Molna, P. Social force model for pedestrian dynamics, Physical Review, 1995, E 51, 42824286.Google Scholar
27. Heppner, F.H. Avian flight formations, Bird-Banding, 1974, 45, pp 160–169.Google Scholar
28. Heppner, F.H. and Haffner, J.D. Communication in bird flocks: an electromagnetic model. Biological and Clinical Effects of Low-Frequency Magnetic and Electric Fields, 1974, Springfield, IL, USA.Google Scholar
29. Heppner, F.H., Convissar, J.L., Moonan, D.E. and Anderson, J.G.T. Visual angle and formation flight in Canada geese (branta canadensis), 1985, AUK, 102, pp 195–198.Google Scholar
30. Bajec, I.L. and Heppner, F.H. Organized flight in birds, Animal Behaviour, 2009, 78, pp 777–789.Google Scholar
31. Blake, W.B. and Gingras, D.R. Comparison of predicted and measured formation flight interference effects, J Aircr, 2004, 41, pp 201–207.Google Scholar
32. Vest, M.S. and Katz, J. Unsteady aerodynamic model of flapping wings, AIAA J, 1996, 34, pp 1435–1440.Google Scholar
33. Fritz, T.E. and Long, L.N. Object-oriented unsteady vortex lattice method for flapping flight, J Aircraft, 2004, 41, pp 1275–1290.Google Scholar
34. Stanford, B.K. and Beran, P.S. Analytical sensitivity analysis of an unsteady vortex-lattice method for flapping-wing optimization, J Aircr, 2010, 47, pp 647–662.Google Scholar
35. Ghommem, M., Hajj, M.R., Mook, D.T., Stanford, B.K., Beran, P.S. and Watson, L.T. Global optimization of actively-morphing flapping wings, J Fluids and Structures, 2012, 30, pp 210–228.Google Scholar
36. Smith, M.J.C., Wilkin, P.J. and Williams, M.H. The advantages of an unsteady panel method in modelling the aerodynamic forces on rigid flapping wings, J Experimental Biology, 1996, 199, pp 1073–1083.Google Scholar
37. Ghommem, M., Collier, N., Niemi, A.H. and Calo, V.M. Shape optimization and performance analysis of flapping wings, Proceedings of The Eighth International Conference on Engineering Computational Technology, 2012.Google Scholar
38. Persson, P., Willis, D. and Peraire, J. Numerical simulation of flapping wings using a panel method and high-order Navier-Stokes solver, Int J for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2012, 89, pp 296–1316.Google Scholar
39. Ghommem, M., Hajj, M.R., Mook, D.T., Stanford, B.K., Beran, P.S. and Watson, L.T. Global local optimization of flapping kinematics in hovering flights, Int J Micro Air Vehicles, 2013, 5, (2), pp 109–126.Google Scholar
40. Leishman, J.G. Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics, 2000, Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
41. Shyy, W., Berg, M. and Ljungsqvist, D. Flapping and flexible wings for biological and micro air vehicles, Prog in Aerospace Sci, 1999, 35, pp 455–505.Google Scholar
42. Ghommem, M. Modeling and Analysis for Optimization of Unsteady Aeroelastic Systems, PhD thesis, 2011 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.Google Scholar
43. Ghommem, M., Collier, N., Niemi, A.H. and Calo, V.M. On the shape optimization of flapping wings and their performance analysis, Aerospace Sci and Tech, in press.Google Scholar
44. Roccia, B.A., Preidikman, S. and Massa, J.C. Modified unsteady vortex-lattice method to study flapping wings in hover flight, AIAA J, 2013, 51, pp 2628–2642.Google Scholar
45. Pennycuick, C.J. Wingbeat frequency of birds in steady cruising flight: New data and improved predictions, J Experimental Biology, 1996, 199, pp 1613–1618.Google Scholar
46. Wu, J.H., Zhang, Y.L. and Sun, M. Hovering of model insects: simulation by coupling equations of motion with Navier-Stokes equations, J Experimental Biology, 2009, 212, pp 3313–3329.Google Scholar
47. Ghommem, M., Hajj, M.R., Mook, D.T., Stanford, B.K., Beran, P.S. and Watson, L.T. Global local optimization of flapping kinematics in hovering flights, Int J Micro Air Vehicles, 2013, 5, (2), pp 09–126.Google Scholar
48. Andersson, M. and Wallander, J. Kin selection and reciprocity in flight formation?, Behavioral Ecology, 2004, 15, pp 158–162.Google Scholar