Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:42:10.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of chordwise deformation on propulsive performance of flapping wings in forward flight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2020

T. Lin ,
W. Xia  and
S. Hu
T. Lin
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures, School of Aerospace Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an710049, China
W. Xia*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures, School of Aerospace Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an710049, China
S. Hu*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures, School of Aerospace Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an710049, China
*
[email protected]
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lack of flexibility limits the performance enhancement of man-made flapping wing Micro Air Vehicles (MAVs). Active chordwise deformation (bending) is introduced into the flapping wing model at low Reynolds number of Re = 200 in the present study. The lattice Boltzmann method with immersed boundary is adopted in the numerical simulation. The effects of the bending amplitude, bending frequency and phase lag between bending and flapping on the propulsive performance are analysed. The numerical results show that all the chordwise deformation parameters including the bending amplitude, bending frequency and phase lag have a great influence on the flow field, Leading-Edge Vortex (LEV), Trailing-Edge Vortex (TEV) and previous Leading-Edge Vortex (pLEV) of the deformable flapping wing, which leads to the variation of the propulsive performance. With decreasing bending amplitude and increasing bending frequency, both the thrust and energy dissipation coefficients increase. The highest thrust coefficient and highest energy dissipation coefficient occur at a phase lag of 180°. On the other hand, strong dependence of the propulsive efficiency on the vortex tangle is found. The highest propulsive efficiency is obtained for the present model at a dimensionless bending amplitude of 0.2, bending frequency of 0.7Hz, and phase lag of 0°.

Keywords

flapping wingsaerodynamicslattice Boltzmann methodchordwise deformationwake structure
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 125 , Issue 1284 , February 2021 , pp. 430 - 451
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Walker, S.M., Thomas, A.L.R. and Taylor, G.K. Deformable wing kinematics in free-flying hoverflies, J R Soc Interface, 2010, 7, (42), pp 131–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisfogh, T. Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanisms for lift production, J Exp Biol, 1973, 59, (1), pp 169–230.Google Scholar
Ho, S., Nassef, H., Pornsinsirirak, N., Tai, Y.-C. and Ho, C.-M. Unsteady aerodynamics and flow control for flapping wing flyers, Prog Aerosp Sci, 2003, 39, (8), pp 635–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bomphrey, R.J. and Godoy-Diana, R. Insect and insect-inspired aerodynamics: unsteadiness, structural mechanics and flight control, Curr Opin Insect Sci, 2018, 30, pp 26–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shyy, W., Aono, H., Chimakurthi, S.K., Trizila, P., Kang, C.K., Cesnik, C.E.S. and Liu, H. Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity, Prog Aerosp Sci, 2010, 46, (7), pp 284–327.Google Scholar
Combes, S.A. and Daniel, T.L. Flexural stiffness in insect wings. I. Scaling and the influence of wing venation, J Exp Biol, 2003, 206, (Pt 17), pp 2979–2987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Combes, S.A. Flexural stiffness in insect wings II. Spatial distribution and dynamic wing bending, J Exp Biol, 2003, 206, (17), pp 2989–2997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heathcote, S., Martin, D. and Gursul, I. Flexible flapping airfoil propulsion at zero freestream velocity, AIAA J, 2004, 42, (11), pp 2196–2204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heathcote, S. and Gursul, I. Flexible flapping airfoil propulsion at low Reynolds numbers, AIAA J, 2007, 45, (5), pp 1066–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, H., Kumar, A.G., Abate, G. and Albertani, R. An experimental investigation on the aerodynamic performances of flexible membrane wings in flapping flight, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2010, 14, (8), pp 575–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kancharala, A.K. and Philen, M.K. Study of flexible fin and compliant joint stiffness on propulsive performance: theory and experiments, Bioinspir Biomim, 2014, 9, (3), pp 0360011–0360025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Im, S., Park, S.G., Cho, Y. and Sung, H.J. Schooling behavior of rigid and flexible heaving airfoils, Int J Heat Fluid Flow, 2018, 69, pp 224–233.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Prats, R. Effect of chordwise flexibility on pitching foil propulsion in a uniform current, Ocean Eng, 2017, 145, pp 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanella, M., Fitzgerald, T., Preidikman, S., Balaras, E. and Balachandran, B. Influence of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of a hovering wing, J Exp Biol, 2009, 212, (1), pp 95–105.Google ScholarPubMed
Olivier, M. and Dumas, G. A parametric investigation of the propulsion of 2D chordwise-flexible flapping wings at low Reynolds number using numerical simulations, J Fluids Struct, 2016, 63, pp 210–237.Google Scholar
Lee, N., Lee, S., Cho, H. and Shin, S. Effect of flexibility on flapping wing characteristics in hover and forward flight, Comput Fluids, 2018, 173, pp 111–117.Google Scholar
Suzuki, K., Aoki, T. and Yoshino, M. Effect of chordwise wing flexibility on flapping flight of a butterfly model using immersed-boundary lattice Boltzmann simulations, Phys Rev E, 2019, 100, (1–1), pp 013104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miao, J.M. and Ho, M.H. Effect of flexure on aerodynamic propulsive efficiency of flapping flexible airfoil, J Fluids Struct, 2006, 22, (3), pp 401–419.Google Scholar
Tay, W.B. and Lim, K.B. Numerical analysis of active chordwise flexibility on the performance of non-symmetrical flapping airfoils, J Fluids Struct, 2010, 26, (1), pp 74–91.Google Scholar
Zhang, X.W. and Zhou, C.Y. Computational study on the hovering mechanisms of a chordwise flexible wing, Proc Inst Mech Eng J Aerosp Eng, 2011, 226, (1), pp 3–14.Google Scholar
Su, X., Yin, Z., Cao, Y. and Zhao, Y. Numerical investigations on aerodynamic forces of deformable foils in hovering motions, Phys Fluids, 2017, 29, (4), pp 041902.Google Scholar
Dong, H., Mittal, R. and Najjar, F.M. Wake topology and hydrodynamic performance of low-aspect-ratio flapping foils, J Fluid Mech, 2006, 566, pp 309–343.Google Scholar
Liu, W., Li, N., Zhao, J. and Su, Y. Wake structure and hydrodynamic performance of flapping foils mimicking fish fin kinematics, Saudi J Biol Sci, 2017, 24, (6), pp 1344–1354.Google ScholarPubMed
Tay, W.B. Symmetrical and non-symmetrical 3D wing deformation of flapping micro aerial vehicles, Aerosp Sci Technol, 2016, 55, pp 242–251.Google Scholar
Medina, A., Eldredge, J.D., Kweon, J. and Choi, H. Illustration of wing deformation effects in three-dimensional flapping flight, AIAA J, 2015, 53, (9), pp 2607–2620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S. and Doolen, G.D. Lattice Boltzmann method for fluid flows, Annu Rev Fluid Mech, 1998, 30, pp 329–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KrÜger, T., Kusumaatmaja, H. and Kuzmin, A. The Lattice Boltzmann Method-Principles and Practice, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2017.Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Fan, J. and Luo, K. Combined multi-direct forcing and immersed boundary method for simulating flows with moving particles, Int J Multiph Flow, 2008, 34, (3), pp 283–302.Google Scholar
Suzuki, K. and Inamuro, T. Effect of internal mass in the simulation of a moving body by the immersed boundary method, Comput Fluids, 2011, 49, (1), pp 173–187.Google Scholar
Peskin, C.S. The immersed boundary method, Acta Numerica, 2002, 11, pp 479–517.Google Scholar
Kotsalos, C., Latt, J. and Chopard, B. Bridging the computational gap between mesoscopic and continuum modeling of red blood cells for fully resolved blood flow, J Comput Phys, 2019, 398, pp 108905.Google Scholar
Latt, J., Malaspinas, O., Kontaxakis, D., Parmigiani, A., Lagrava, D., Brogi, F., Belgacem, M.B., Thorimbert, Y., Leclaire, S., Li, S., Marson, F., Lemus, J., Kotsalos, C., Conradin, R., Coreixas, C., Petkantchin, R., Raynaud, F., Beny, J. and Chopard, B. Palabos: parallel lattice Boltzmann solver, Comput Math Appl, in press, available online 23 April 2020. (doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2020.03.022)Google Scholar
Chakraborty, P., Balachandar, S. and Adrian, R.J. On the relationships between local vortex identification schemes, J Fluid Mech, 2005, 535, pp 189–214.Google Scholar
Guerrero, J.E. Wake signature and strouhal number dependence of finite-span flapping wings, J Bionic Eng, 2010, 7, (S4), pp S109–S122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, B., Roll, J.,Liu, Y., Troolin, D.R. and Deng, X. Three-dimensional vortex wake structure of flapping wings in hovering flight, J R Soc Interface, 2014, 11, (91), pp 20130984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed