Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:13:38.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Design of Aeroplane Struts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2016

Extract

The failure of struts under end load is due to two causes, crushing, due to direct compression, and excessive bending, due to elastic instability. In a general way we may say that the end portions of the strut tend to fail by crushing and the middle portion tends to fail by bending, but we cannot make a rule to decide where the middle portion ends and the end portions begin, because both causes are really operating simultaneously all along the strut, and we can only form a vague impression of their relative importance at various sections of the strut. A parallel strut, for instance, unless it is very short, will fail by bending at or near the middle, and the end portions will show no signs of crushing; so we may fairly infer that weight can be saved in a solid wooden strut without much loss of strength by tapering the ends; and that on the whole the efficiency of a strut, as measured by the ratio of crippling end load to weight or (resistance + m weight) where m* is a fraction, can be improved by tapering.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1918

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note on page 313 * The value of m depends on the case under consideration. A common value is 1/8 or 1/6.

Note on page 323 * 10° is the angle of yaw that gives the greatest lateral wind load (see the Technical Report of the Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1912-13, p. 114

Note on page 324 * These values correspond approximately to a streamline strut of fineness ratio 3.