Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:31:54.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A damage mechanics model for low-velocity impact damage analysis of composite laminates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2017

N. Li ,
P.H. Chen  and
Q. Ye
N. Li*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China
P.H. Chen*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China
Q. Ye*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China
*
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A method was developed to predict numerically the damage of composite laminates with multiple plies under low-velocity impact loading. The Puck criterion for 3D stress states was adopted to model the intralaminar damage including matrix cracking and fibre breakage, and to obtain the orientation of the fracture plane due to matrix failure. According to interlaminar delamination mechanism, a new delamination criterion was proposed. The influence of transverse and through-thickness normal stress, interlaminar shear stress and damage conditions of adjacent plies on delamination was considered. In order to predict the impact-induced damage of composite laminates with more plies quickly and efficiently, an approach, which can predict the specific damage of several plies in a single solid element, was proposed by interpolation on the strains of element integration points. Moreover, the proposed model can predict specific failure modes. A good agreement between the predicted delamination shapes and sizes and the experimental results shows correctness of the developed numerical method for predicting low-velocity impact damage on composite laminates.

Keywords

Low-velocity impactdelamination criterionPuck criterionsolid element representing stacks of pliessimulation
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 121 , Issue 1238 , April 2017 , pp. 515 - 532
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Hull, D. and Shi, Y.B. Damage mechanism characterization in composite damage tolerance investigations, Composite Structures, 1993, 23, pp 99–120.Google Scholar
2. Hou, J.P., Petrinic, N. and Ruiz, C. Prediction of impact damage in composite plates, Composites Science and Technology, 2000, 60, pp 273–281.Google Scholar
3. Hou, J.P., Petrinic, N. and Ruiz, C. Delamination criterion for laminated composites under low-velocity impact, Composites Science and Technology, 2000, 60, pp 2069–2074.Google Scholar
4. Chang, F.K. and Chang, K.Y. A progressive damage model for laminated composites containing stress concentrations, J. Composite Materials, 1987, 21, pp 834–855.Google Scholar
5. Hinton, M.J., Kaddour, A.S. and Soden, P.D. A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates judged against experimental evidence, Composites Science and Technology, 2002, 62, pp 1725–1797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Soden, P.D., Kaddour, A.S. and Hinton, M.J. Recommendations for designers and researchers resulting from the world-wide failure exercise, Composites Science and Technology, 2004, 64, pp 589–604.Google Scholar
7. Knops, M. Failure Analysis of Failure in Fiber Polymer Laminates: The Theory of Alfred Puck, 2008, Springer, Germany.Google Scholar
8. Faggiani, A. and Falzon, B.G. Predicting low-velocity impact damage on a stiffened composite panel, Composites: Part A, 2010, 41, pp 737–749.Google Scholar
9. Shi, Y., Swait, T. and Soutis, C. Modelling damage evolution in composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact, Composite Structures, 2012, 94, pp 2902–2913.Google Scholar
10. Raimondo, L., Iannucci, L. and Robinson, P. A progressive failure model for mesh size independent FE analysis of composite laminates subject to low-velocity impact damage, Composites Science and Technology, 2012, 72, pp 624–632.Google Scholar
11. Turon, A., Davila, C.G. and Camanho, P.P. An engineering solution for using coarse meshes in the simulation of delamination with cohesive zone models, NASA/TM-2005-213547, 2005, Hampton, Virginia, USA.Google Scholar
12. Choi, H.Y., Downs, R.J. and Chang, F.K. A New Approach Toward Understanding Damage Mechanisms and Mechanics of Laminated Composites due to Low-velocity Impact, Part I, J. Composite Materials, 1991, 25, pp 992–1011.Google Scholar
13. Choi, H.Y., Downs, R.J. and Chang, F.K. A new approach toward understanding damage mechanisms and mechanics of laminated composites due to low-velocity impact, part II, J. Composite Materials, 1991, 25, pp 1012–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Her, S.C. and Liang, Y.C. The finite element analysis of composite laminates and shell structures subjected to low velocity impact. Composite Structures, 2004, 66, pp 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Bouvet, C., Castanie, B. and Bizeul, M. Low velocity impact modelling in laminate composite panels with discrete interface elements, Int. J. Solids and Structures, 2009, 46, pp 2809–2821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Deuschle, H.M. 3D Failure Analysis of UD Fiber Reinforced Composites: Puck's Theory within FEA, 2010, University Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
17. Kim, E.H., Rim, M.S. and Lee, I. Composite damage model based on continuum damage mechanics and low velocity impact analysis of composite plates, Composite Structures, 2013, 95, pp 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Feng, D. and Aymerich, F. Finite element modelling of damage induced by low-velocity impact on composite laminates, Composite Structures, 2014, 108, pp 161–171.Google Scholar
19. Camanho, P.P. and Matthews, F.L. A progressive damage model for mechanically fastened joints in composite laminates, J. Composite Materials, 1999, 33, pp 2248–2280.Google Scholar
20. Puck, A., Kopp, J. and Knops, M. Guidelines for the determination of the parameters in Puck's action plane strength criterion, Composites Science and Technology, 2002, 62, pp 371–378.Google Scholar
21. ABAQUS. ABAQUS Version 6.14, 2014, Dessault Systemes. Providence, Rhode Island, US.Google Scholar
22. Li, X., Hallett, S.R. and Wisnom, M.R. Predicting the effect of through-thickness compressive stress on delamination using interface elements, Composites: Part A, 2008, 39, pp 218–230.Google Scholar
23. Zhang, X., Bianchi, F. and Liu, H. Predicting low-velocity impact damage in composites using a cohesive fracture model, Aeronautical J., 2012, 116, pp 1367–1381.Google Scholar
24. Aymerich, F., Dore, F. and Priolo, P. Prediction of impact-induced delamination in cross-ply composite laminates using cohesive interface elements, Composites Science and Technology, 2008, 68, pp 2383–2390.Google Scholar
25. Zhang, J. and Zhang, X. Simulating low-velocity impact induced delamination in composites by a quasi-static load model with surface-based cohesive contact, Composite Structures, 2015, 125, pp 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Wang, R.P., Chen, P.H. and Shen, Z. Damage resistance analysis of composite laminates subjected to quasi-static indentation, Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2008, 25 (3), pp 149–153. (In Chinese).Google Scholar