Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:00:43.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Creep of Pressurised Cylindrical Shells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

R. K. Penny*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Liverpool

Extract

There are numerous examples in the aero and power producing industries of components which are designed to sustain creep deformation. An important class of structures in this category lies in pressurised shells of revolution. The few analyses which allow predictions of creep deformations to be made are usually restricted to the secondary creep problem, contain approximate relations between stress resultants and deformations or ignore the important effects of bending. While the neglect ot primary creep is not important for cases of steady loading sustained for long periods, stress redistribution should be calculated if the loading period is less than the time taken to reach a stationary state of stress; such a state of affairs is very likely in two-shift operated power producing plant and also in aircraft components. Approximations involving concepts of “sandwich” shells that are often made to form moment-curvature rate relations can be dispensed with by integrating the stress-strain rate relations through the shell thickness. Although the stresses become non-linear through the shell wall they are slowly varying and the integration introduces no problem. The integration requires the use of a digital computer but creep problems have to be solved numerically, except in a very few cases, so that whatever the assumptions automatic computation is necessary. While some practical shells approximate to the momentless condition the most likely case will include bending which, although likely to be relaxed by a process of stress redistribution, will cause additional creep straining.

Type
Technical Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1969 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Calladine, C. R. The Steady Creep of Shells—a Method of Analysis. Proc Symp Nuclear Reactor Containment Buildings and Pressure Vessels, Glasgow, Butterworths, 1960.Google Scholar
2. MacKenzie, A. C. Secondary Creep of a Cylindrical Thin Shell Subject to Axisymmetric Loading. J Mech Eng Sci (IMechE), Vol 8, 1966.Google Scholar
3. Onat, E. T. and Yuksel, H. On the Steady Creep of Shells. Proc Third US Nat Cong Appl Mech, 1958.Google Scholar
4. Bienek, M. P. and Freudenthal, A. M. Creep Deformations and Stresses in Pressurised Long Cylindical Shells. J Aerospace Sc, Vol 27, 1960.Google Scholar
5. Gemma, A. E., Rowe, G. H. and Spahl, R. J. Elastic and Creep Characteristics of a Class of Shells With Constant Stress Ratio. Trans. ASME, J Basic Eng, Paper 61- Met 3, 1961.Google Scholar
6. Penny, R. K. The Creep of Spherical Shells Containing Discontinuities. Int J Mech Sc, Vol 9, 1967.Google Scholar
7. Diamant, E. S. Axisymmetric Creep in Cylindrical Shells. AlAA Journal, October 1967.Google Scholar
8. Penny, R. K. Axisymmetric Bending of the General Shell of Revolution During Creep. J Mech Eng Sci (IMechE), Vol 6, 1964.Google Scholar
9. Penny, R. K. Symmetric Bending of the General Shell of Revolution by Finite Difference Methods. J Mech Eng Sci (IMechE), Vol 3, 1961.Google Scholar
10. Calladine, C. R. Stress Concentration in Steady Creep. Joint International Conference on Creep. New York, London. Published by IMechE, 1963.Google Scholar
11. Marriott, D. L. and Leckie, F. A. Some Observations On the Deflections of Structures During Creep. Conf on Thermal Loading and Creep in Structures. IMechE, London, 1964.Google Scholar
12. Hoff, N. J. Effects Thermiques dans le Calcul de la Resistance des Structures d'Avions et d'Engins. AGARD Report No J2, January 1956.Google Scholar
13. Budiansky, B. A Reassessment of Deformation Theories of Plasticity. J Appl Mechanics Trans ASME, Vol 81, 1959.Google Scholar
14. Wood, Winifred L. Comparison of Dynamic Relaxation With Three Other Iterative Methods. The Engineer, 24th November 1967.Google Scholar