Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:34:32.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Considerations for flight testing of UAVs in South African airspace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

L. A. Ingham ,
T. Jones  and
A. Maneschijn
L. A. Ingham
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
T. Jones
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
A. Maneschijn
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

South Africa has strategic requirements for tasks such as maritime patrol and border control. Research on UAVs should be done in order to design, certify and operate UAVs in civil airspace to satisfy these requirements. If principles such as ‘equivalence’, initially proposed by Eurocontrol are to be adopted in South Africa, it then follows that similar standards used by manned aircraft should be used by UAVs. Similarly, because the process of creating UAV regulations has not kept up with the pace of UAV development, and because dedicated UAV regulations do not yet exist in South Africa, UAVs must be tested and evaluated in order to prove compliance with comparable manned aircraft regulations in the foreseeable future until regulations are created or modified to accommodate UAVs. Given the airspace restrictions, and lack of applicable standards and regulations, proper flight testing of UAVs can become a very specialised task. Most test techniques applied to testing of manned aircraft are fortunately equally applicable to UAVs. This is a research-based paper that provides guidance to flight testers, UAV developers and research organisations wishing to execute tests in South Africa by suggesting a number of considerations for testing of UAVs.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 110 , Issue 1114 , December 2006 , pp. 803 - 811
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2006 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ingham, L.A., Jones, T. and Maneschijn, A., Certification of unmanned aerial vehicles in South African airspace, SAIME R&D J, Johannesburg, South Africa, 2006.Google Scholar
2. Office of the Secretary of Defense, Airspace integration plan for unmanned aviation, Washington D.C., USA, 2004.Google Scholar
3. Office of the Secretary of Defense, UAV Roadmap, 2001.Google Scholar
4. European Civil Unmanned Air Vehicle Roadmap, 1, 2005.Google Scholar
5. Ingham, L.A., Jones, T. and Maneschijn, A., Considerations for UAV design and operation in South African Airspace, Aeronaut J, London, UK, 2006.Google Scholar
6. Haupt, P., A strategy for a sustainable, economical and growing aerospace industry, South African Department of Science and Technology, Pretoria, South Africa, 2005.Google Scholar
7. Küke, R., Unmanned aerial vehicle safety issues for civil operations, inaugural meeting UAVNET, 2004.Google Scholar
8. De Garmo, M.T., Issues concerning integration of unmanned aerial vehicles in civil airspace, MITRE, 2004.Google Scholar
9. Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, Part 101, 1st ed, Australia, 2003.Google Scholar
10. Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operation in the US National Airspace system – Interim operational approval guidance, AFS-400 UAS Policy 05-01, Federal Aviation Administration 2005.Google Scholar
11. Federal Aviation Administration Flight Plan 2004-2008, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
12. French Ministry of Defence, Work and Efforts to Enable the Integration of UAVs into the Airspace, 2004.Google Scholar
13. UAV Task Force Final Report, A Concept for European regulations for civil unmanned aerial vehicles, 2004.Google Scholar
14. Unmanned aircraft systems roadmap 2005-2030, United States Office of the Secretary of Defence, 2005.Google Scholar
15. Williams, W. and Harris, M., The challenges of flight testing unmanned air vehicles, October 2002, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
16. NASA ERAST Alliance Certification Project, HALE Certification and Regulatory Roadmap UAVs, version 1.3.Google Scholar
17. Convention on International Civil Aviation, Chicago, 1944.Google Scholar
18. Siko, L., South Africa’s maritime interest and responsibilities, African Security Review, 1996, 5, (2), Pretoria, South Africa.Google Scholar
19. Fabrycky, W.J. and Mize, J.H., Systems Engineering and Analysis, 3rd Ed, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, 1998.Google Scholar
20. Giadrosich, D.L., Operations research analysis in test and evaluation, AIAA, 1998, Washington DC, USA 1998.Google Scholar
21. RTCA DO-178B, Software considerations in airborne systems and equipment certification, 1992.Google Scholar
22. Federal Aviation Regulations, Title 14 – Aeronautics and Space, U.S. government Printing Office, Washington, USA.Google Scholar
23. Clothier, R., Harrison, A., Dusha, D., Mcmanus, I., Greer, D. and Walker, R., Development of a low cost UAV System for civilian airspace integration trials, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, 2005.Google Scholar
24. Civil Aviation Regulations, Notice No R518, Civil Aviation Authority, South Africa, 1998.Google Scholar
25. Mettler, B., Schouwenaars, T., How, J., Paunicka, J. and Feron, E., Autonomous UAV Guidance build-up: Flight test demonstration and evaluation plan, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2005.Google Scholar
26. Drezner, J.A. and Leonard, R.S., Innovative Development: Global hawk and dark star – Flight test in the HAE UAV ACTD program, 2002.Google Scholar
27. Rotary wing performance, US Naval test Pilot School, USNTPS-FTM-No106, Patuxent River, 1995.Google Scholar
28. Helicopter performance and flying qualities evaluation, National Test Pilot School, 1998.Google Scholar
29. Introduction to Performance and flying qualities Flight Testing, National Test Pilot School, 1995, 2nd Ed, Mojave.Google Scholar
30. Performance Flight Testing, National Test Pilot School, 1st ed, Mojave, 1997.Google Scholar
31. Flying Qualities Flight Testing, National Test Pilot School, 1st ed, Mojave, 1997.Google Scholar
32. Rotary Wing Stability and Control, Empire Test Pilot School. Boscombe Down, UK. 1993.Google Scholar
33. Cooper, G.E. and Harper, R.P., The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities, NASA TN D-5153, 1969.Google Scholar
34. Aeronautical design standard, handling qualities requirements for Military Rotorcraft, ADS-33E-PRF, 1996.Google Scholar
35. Foster, T.M., Dynamic stability and handling qualities of small unmanned aerial vehicles, Brigham young University, 2005.Google Scholar
36. Williams, W., Uav handling qualities…. You must be joking, Aerospace Sciences Corporation, Australia, 2003.Google Scholar
37. Thurling, A.J., Improving UAV Flying qualities using time delay compensation, USAF Institute of Technology, USA, 2000.Google Scholar
38. Hare, A., Developmental test and evaluation of an unmanned air vehicle ground control flight display, University of South Australia, Australia, 2002.Google Scholar
39. Crew Station Evaluation and Data Analysis, National Test Pilot School, Mojave, 1998.Google Scholar
40. Walker, L.A., Flight Testing the X-36 – The Test Pilot’s Perspective, NASA CR-198958, California, USA, 1997.Google Scholar
41. RTCA DO-160D, Environmental conditions and test procedures for airborne equipment, 1997.Google Scholar
42. MIL-STD-461E, Requirements for the control of electromagnetic interference characteristics of subsystems and equipment, 1999.Google Scholar
43. RTCA DO-178B, Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification, 1992.Google Scholar
44. How, J., King, E. and Kuwata, Y., Flight demonstrations of cooperative control for UAV Teams, AIAA, Chicago, USA, 2004.Google Scholar
45. Standard Practice of Maintenance and Development of Maintenance Manuals for Light Unmanned Aircraft Systems, F 2584 – 06, ASTM, Pasadena, USA, 2006.Google Scholar
46. Teets, E.H. Jr, Donohue, C.J., Underwood, K. and Baure, J.E., Atmospheric considerations for uninhabited aerial vehicle test planning, 1998, NASA Dryden Research Center, Edwards, California, USA.Google Scholar
47. Frate, J.H. and Cosentino, G.B., Recent flight test experience with uninhabited aerial vehicles at the NASA Dryden Flight Research Center, 1998, NASA/TM-1998-206546, California, USA.Google Scholar
48. Sorton, E.F. and Hammaker, S., Simulated flight testing of autonomous unmanned aerial vehicle using flightGear, Institute for Scientific Research, 2005, Fairmont, West Virginia, USA.Google Scholar
49. Seigal, B., Deters, R.W. and Selig, M.S., Icing encounter flight simulator, 2002, AIAA, Reno, USA.Google Scholar
50. Johnson, E.N. and Mishura, S., Flight simulation for the development of an experimental UAV, 2002, AIAA 2002-4975, California, USA.Google Scholar
51. Weingarten, N.C., History of in-flight simulation & flying qualities, Research at Calspan, AIAA J Aircr, 2005, 42, (2), Austin, Texas, USA.Google Scholar
52. Minor, J., Thurling, and, A.J., Ohmit, E., Vista – A 21st century UAV testbed, USAF Test Pilot School, Edwards AFB, California, USA.Google Scholar
53. Flight demonstrations evaluate UAV collision avoidance technology, NASA News Release 03-20, 2003.Google Scholar
54. Endacott, S., Surrogate unmanned aerial vehicle project update, CY-2005, Nevada, USA.Google Scholar
55. Utt, J., Mccalmont, J. and Deschenes, M., Test and integration of a detect and avoid system, 2004, AIAA 2004-6424, Chicago, USA.Google Scholar