Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:48:41.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Computational aeroelastic studies of a generic hypersonic vehicle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

B. J. Thuruthimattam ,
P. P. Friedmann ,
K. G. Powell  and
R. E. Bartels
B. J. Thuruthimattam
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
P. P. Friedmann
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA [email protected]
K. G. Powell
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
R. E. Bartels
Affiliation:
NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The hypersonic aeroelastic problem of a generic hypersonic vehicle having a lifting-body type fuselage and canted fins is studied using third order piston theory and Euler aerodynamics. Computational aeroelastic response results are used to obtain frequency and damping characteristics, and compared with those from piston theory solutions for a variety of flight conditions. Aeroelastic behavior is studied for the range of 2·5 < M < 28, at altitudes ranging from 10,000ft to 80,000ft. Because of the significant computational resources required, a study on optimal mesh selection was first carried out for use with Euler aerodynamics. The three dimensional flow effects captured using Euler aerodynamics was found to lead to significantly higher flutter boundaries when compared to those based on nonlinear piston theory. The results presented here illustrate some of the more important three dimensional effects that can be encountered in hypersonic aeroelasticity of complex configurations.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 113 , Issue 1150: Flight structures fundamental research in the United States of America: A Special Issue – PART II , December 2009 , pp. 763 - 774
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bisplinghoff, R.L. and Dugundji, J., Influence of Aerodynamic Heating on Aeroe-lastic Phenomena in High Temperature Effects in Aircraft Structures, Pergamon Press, 1958, pp 288–312.Google Scholar
2. Garrick, I.E., Aeroelasticity — frontiers and beyond, J of Aircr, 1976, 13, pp 641–657.Google Scholar
3. Hedgepeth, J.M., Flutter of rectangular simply supported panels at high supersonic speeds, J of the Aero Sciences, August 1957, 24, (8), pp 563–573.Google Scholar
4. Laidlaw, W.R. and Wyker, J.H., Potential aerothermoelastic problems associated with advanced vehicle design, Aerospace Engineering, January 1963, pp 154–164.Google Scholar
5. Xue, D.Y. and Mei, C., Finite element two-dimensional panel flutter at high supersonic speeds and elevated temperature, Proc. 31st AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Maerials Conference, 1990, pp 1464–1475, AIAA Paper No. 90-0982.Google Scholar
6. Gray, E.G. and Mei, C., Large-amplitude finite element flutter analysis of composite panels in hypersonic flow, Proc. 33rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Dallas, TX, April 16-17 1992, pp 492–512, AIAA Paper No 92-2130.Google Scholar
7. Abbas, J.F. and Ibrahim, R.A., Nonlinear flutter of orthotropic composite panel under aerodynamic heating, AIAA J, 1993, 31, (8), pp 1478–1488.Google Scholar
8. Bein, T., Friedmann, P., Zhong, X. and Nydick, I., Hypersonic flutter of a curved shallow panel with aerodynamic heating, Proc 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, La Jolla, CA, April 19-22, 1993, AIAA Paper No. 93-1318.Google Scholar
9. Nydick, I., Friedmann, P.P. and Zhong, X., Hypersonic panel flutter studies on curved panels, Proc 36th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, New Orleans, LA, April 1995, pp 2995–3011, AIAA Paper no 95-1485.Google Scholar
10. Mei, C, Abdel-Motagly, K. and Chen, R., Review of nonlinear panel flutter at supersonic and hypersonic speeds, Applied Mechanics Reviews, 1998.Google Scholar
11. Ricketts, R., Noll, T., Whitlow, W. and Huttsell, L., An overview of aeroelasticity studies for the National Aerospace Plane, Proc. 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, La Jolla, CA, April 19-22, 1993, AIAA Paper No. 93-1313, pp 152–162.Google Scholar
12. Spain, C., Zeiler, T.A., Bullock, E. and Hodge, J.S., A flutter investigation of AU-moveable NASP-like wings at hypersonic speeds, Proc 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, La Jolla, CA, April 19-22, 1993, AIAA Paper No 93-1315.Google Scholar
13. Scott, R.C. and Pototzky, A.S., A method of predicting quasi-steady aerodynamics for flutter analysis of high speed vehicles using steady CFD calculations, Proc. 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, La Jolla, CA, April 19-22, 1993, AIAA Paper No 93-1364, pp 595–603.Google Scholar
14. Spain, C., Zeiler, T.A., Gibbons, M.D., Soistmann, D.L., Pozefsky, P., Dejesus, R.O. and Brannon, C.R., Aeroelastic character of a National Aerospace Plane demonstrator concept, Proc 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, La Jolla, CA, April 19-22, 1993, pp 163–170.Google Scholar
15. Rodgers, J.P., Aerothermoelastic analysis of a NASP-like vertical fin, Proc 33rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Dallas, TX, April 1992, AIAA-92-2400-CP.Google Scholar
16. Heeg, J., Zeiler, T., Pototzky, A., Spain, C. and Engelund, W., Aerothermoelastic analysis of a NASP demonstrator model, Proc 34th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, La Jolla, CA, April 19-22 1993, AIAA Paper No 93-1366, pp 617–627.Google Scholar
17. Heeg, J. and Gilbert, M.G., Active control of aerothermoelastic effects for a conceptual hypersonic aircraft, J of Aircr, 1993, 30, pp 453–458.Google Scholar
18. Blades, E., Ruth, M. and Fuhrman, D., Aeroelastic analysis of the X-34 launch vehicle, Proc 40th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, St. Louis, MO, 1999, AIAA Paper No. 99-1352, pp 1321–1331.Google Scholar
19. Friedmann, P.P., McNamara, J.J., Thuruthimattam, B.J. and Nydick, I., Aeroelastic analysis of hypersonic vehicles, J of Fluids and Structures, 2004, 19, pp 681–712.Google Scholar
20. Gupta, K.K., Voelker, L.S., Bach, C., Doyle, T. and Hahn, E., CFD-based aeroelastic analysis of the X-43 hypersonic flight vehicle, 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, 2001, AIAA Paper No 2001-0712.Google Scholar
21. Berry, S.A., Horvath, T.J., Hollis, B.R., Thompson, R.A. and Hamilton, H.H., X-33 hypersonic boundary layer transition, 33rd AIAA Thermophysics Conference, Norfolk, VA, 28 June – 1 July 1999, AIAA Paper No. 99-3560.Google Scholar
22. Riley, C.J., Kleb, W.L. and Alter, S.J., Aeroheating predictions for X-34 using an inviscid-boundary layer method, 36th Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 1998, AIAA Paper No. 98-0880.Google Scholar
23. McNamara, J.J. and Friedmann, P.P., Aeroelastic and aerothermoelastic analysis of hypersonic vehicles: current status and future trends, Proceedings of the 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, April 23-26, 2007, AIAA Paper No. 2007-2013.Google Scholar
24. McNamara, J.J., Friedmann, P.P., Powell, K.G, Thuruthimattam, B. and Bartels, R.E., Aeroelastic and aerothermoelastic behavior in hypersonic flow, AIAA J, October 2008, 46, (10), pp 2591–2610.Google Scholar
25. Krist, S.L., Biedron, R.T. and Rumsey, C.L., CFL3D User’s Manual (Version 5.0), NASA, TM 1998-208444, 1997.Google Scholar
26. Bartels, R.E., Mesh strategies for accurate computation of unsteady spoiler and aeroelastic problems, J of Aircr, May 2000, 37, (3), pp 521–525.Google Scholar
27. Robinson, B.A., Batina, J.T. and Yang, H.T., Aeroelastic analysis of wings using the Euler equations with a deforming mesh, J of Aircr, November 1991, 28, pp 778–788.Google Scholar
28. Cunningham, H.J., Batina, J.T. and Bennett, R.M., Modern wing flutter analysis by computational fluid dynamic methods, J of Aircr, 1989, 25, (10), pp 962–968.Google Scholar
29. Batina, J.T., Unsteady Euler airfoil solutions using unstructured dynamic meshes, AIAA J, 1990, 28, pp 1381–1388.Google Scholar
30. Tezduyar, T.E., Behr, M. and Liou, J., A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces — The deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: I. the concept and the preliminary numerical tests, Computer Methods in Applied Mech and Eng, 1992, 94, pp 339–351.Google Scholar
31. Hughes, T.J.R. and Hulbert, G.M., Space-time finite element methods for elastodynamics: formulations and error estimates, Computer Methods in Applied Mech and Eng, 1988, 66, pp 339–363.Google Scholar
32. Patil, M.J., Hodges, D.H. and Cesnik, C.E.S., Nonlinear aeroelastic analysis of complete aircraft in subsonic flow, J of Aircr, September 2000, 37, (5), pp 753–760.Google Scholar
33. Donea, J., Guiliani, S. and Halleux, J.P., An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element method for transient dynamic fluid-structure interactions, Computer Methods in Applied Mech and Eng, 1982, 33, pp. 689–723.Google Scholar
34. Bendiksen, O.O., A new approach to computational aeroelasticity, Proc. AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC 32nd Structure, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conf, Baltimore, MD, 8-9 April, 1991, AIAA Paper 91-0939, pp 1712–1727.Google Scholar
35. Farhat, C, Lesoinne, M. and Maman, N., Mixed explicit/implicit time integration of coupled aeroelastic problems: three-field formulation, geometric conservation and distributed solution, Int J for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 1995, 21, pp 807–835.Google Scholar
36. Iran, H. and Farhat, C., An integrated platform for the simulation of fluid-structure-thermal interaction problems, Proc. 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Denver, CO, April 2002, AIAA Paper No 2002-1307.Google Scholar
37. Stephens, C.H., Arena, A.S. and Gupta, K.K., Application of the transpiration method for aeroservoelastic prediction using CFD, Proc. of the 39th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit, Long Beach, CA, April 20-23, 1998, AIAA Paper 98-2071.Google Scholar
38. Hartwich, P. and Agrawal, S., Perturbing multiblock patched grids in aeroelastic design optimization applications, June 1997, AIAA Paper 97-2038.Google Scholar
39. Bartels, R.E., Rumsey, C.L. and Biedron, R.T., CFL3D Ver. 6.4–General Usage and Aeroelastic Analysis, 2006, NASA TM-2006-214301.Google Scholar
40. Bartels, R.E., Finite macro-element mesh deformation in a structured multi-block Navier–Stokes code, 2005, NASA TM -2005-213789.Google Scholar
41. Thompson, J., Bharat, S. and Weatherrill, N., Handbook of Grid Generation, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1998.Google Scholar
42. MSC/NASTRAN Basic Dynamic Analysis User's Guide, Los Angeles, The MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation, 1998.Google Scholar
43. Bousman, W.G. and Winkler, D.J., Application of the moving-block analysis, Proceedings of the AIAA Dynamics Specialist Conference, Atlanta, GA, April 1981, pp 755–763, AIAA Paper No 81-0653.Google Scholar
44. Nydick, I., Studies in Hypersonic Aeroelasticity, PhD Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 2000.Google Scholar
45. Thuruthimattam, B.J., Fundamental Studies in Hypersonic Aeroelasticity Using Computational Methods, PhD Dissertation, The University of Michigan, 2005.Google Scholar
46. Lighthill, M.J., Oscillating airfoils at high Mach numbers, J of the Aero Sciences, June 1953, 20, (6).Google Scholar
47. Ashley, H. and Zartarian, G., Piston theory — a new aerodynamic tool for the aeroelastician, J of the Aero Sciences, 1956, 23, (12), pp 1109–1118.Google Scholar
48. McNamara, J.J., Friedmann, P.P., Crowell, A.R. and Gogulapati, A., Reduced order modeling of unsteady hypersonic aerodynamics, International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, Seattle, WA, June 21-25, 2009, IFASD Paper 2009-031.Google Scholar