Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:53:43.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparative study on different techniques to control rotary wing vibration using smart structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

F. Nitzsche
F. Nitzsche*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringCarleton University, Ottawa, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This investigation discusses some proposed techniques to attenuate rotary wing vibration using smart materials. Advantages and disadvantages of these solutions are analysed in greater detail. Numerical results from feasibility studies are summarised to present the accomplishments already achieved and the goals to be pursued in the near future to develop the next generation of the so-called ‘smart rotors’.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 103 , Issue 1027 , September 1999 , pp. 429 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ham, N.D. Helicopter individual blade control at MIT 1977-1985, Vertica, 1987,11, (1/2), pp 109–122.Google Scholar
2. Nitzsche, F. Modal sensors and actuators for individual blade control, Proc: AIAA/ASME/ ASCE/AHS/ASC 34. Structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, AIAA, Washington DC, 1993, part 6, pp 3507-3516.Google Scholar
3. Bielawa, R.L. Rotary wing structural dynamics and aeroelasticity, AIAA, Washington DC, 1992, pp 211-212.Google Scholar
4. Nitzsche, F. and Breitbach, E. A study on the feasibility of using adaptive structures in the attenuation of the vibration characteristics of rotary wings, Proc: AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC 33. Structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, AIAA, Washington DC, 1992, part 3, pp 1391-1402.Google Scholar
5. Hanagud, S., Prasad, J.V.R., Bowles, T. and Naoesh-Babu, G.L. Smart structures in the active control of blade vortex interaction, paper no 75, 17. European rotorcraft forum, Berlin, Germany, September 24- 27, 1991.Google Scholar
6. Geissler, W. and Raffel, M. Dynamic stall control by airfoil deformation, Proc: 19. European rotorcraft forum, Associazione Italiana di Aeronautica ed Astronautica, Cernobbio, Italy, 1993, pp C2.l-C2.13.Google Scholar
7. Prasad, J.V.R., Sankar, L.N. and Park, W.G. Active control of rotor noise, Proc: Smart structures and intelligent systems 1993, SPIE — The International Society for Optical Engineering, Washington, DC, 1993, 1917, (1), pp 255–266.Google Scholar
8. Chopra, I. Development of a smart rotor, Proc: 19. European rotorcraft forum, Associazione Italiana di Aeronautica ed Astronautica, Cernobbio, Italy, 1993, pp N6.l-N6.18.Google Scholar
9. Spangler, R.L., and Hall, S.R. Piezoelectric actuators for helicopter rotor control, Proc: AIAA/ASME/ASCE/ AHS/ASC 31. Structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, AIAA, Washington DC, 1990, part 3, pp 1589-1599.Google Scholar
10. Millott, T.A. and Friedmann, P.P. Vibration reduction in helicopter rotors using an active control surface located on the blade, Proc: AIAA/ASME/ASCE/ AHS/ASC 33. Structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, AIAA, Washington DC, 1992, part 4, pp 1975-1988.Google Scholar
11. Strehlow, H. and Rapp, H. Smart materials for helicopter rotor active control, paper no 5, AGARD/SMP specialists meeting on smart structures for aircraft and spacecraft, Lindau, Germany, October 5-7, 1992.Google Scholar
12. Narkiewicz, J. and Roguz, M. Smart flap for helicopter rotor blade performance improvement, Proc: 19. European rotorcraft forum, Associazione Italiana di Aeronautica ed Astronautica, Cernobbio, Italy, 1993, pp G9.l-G9.ll.Google Scholar
13. Samak, D.K. and Chopra, I. A feasibility study to build a smart rotor: trailing edge flap actuation, Proc: Smart structures and intelligent systems, 1993, SPIE — The International Society for Optical Engineering, Washington DC, 1993, 1917, part 1, pp 225–237.Google Scholar
14. Nitzsche, F., Lammering, R. and Breitbach, E. Can smart materials modify blade root boundary conditions to attenuate helicopter vibration? Fourth international conference on adaptive structures, DGLR paper no. 93-04-12, Cologne, Germany, November 2-4, 1993, pp 139-150.Google Scholar
15. Nitzsche, F. and Breitbach|E. The smart structures technology in the vibration control of helicopter blades in forward flight, Proc: 1 st European conference on smart structures and materials, EOS/SPIE — IOP, UK, 1992, pp 321-324.Google Scholar
16. Mckillip, R.M. Periodic control of the individual blade control helicopter rotor, Vertica, 9, (2), 1985, pp 199–225.Google Scholar
17. Mckillip, R.M. Periodic model-following for the control-configured helicopter, J Amer Heli Soc, July 1991, pp 4–12.Google Scholar
18. Nitzsche, F. Periodic model-following controller for the independent modal control of individual blades using smart structures, Proc: 19. European rotorcraft forum, Associazione Italiana di Aeronautica ed Astronautica, Cernobbio, Italy, 1993, pp G6.l-G6.12.Google Scholar
19. Lee, C.-K. and Moon, F.C. Modal sensors/actuators, J App Mech, 57, June 1990, pp 434–441.Google Scholar