Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:18:30.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Combustor-inlet interactions in a low-order dynamic model of ramjet engines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2020

K. Liu  and
T. Cui Open the ORCID record for T. Cui [Opens in a new window]
K. Liu
Affiliation:
Shenzhen Graduate School Harbin Institute of TechnologyShenzhen518055China
T. Cui*
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics Zhejiang UniversityHangzhou310027China
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The coexistence of multiple stable states is indicative of self-organising processes occurring in the course of the combustor-inlet interactions in a ramjet engine and give rise to the appearance of various nonlinear phenomena. This paper provides a dynamic model that can describe the multiple stable states and the corresponding nonlinear effects to further investigate the dynamic interactions between combustor and inlet in a ramjet engine. Our study shows the whole engine can display distinct dynamic behaviours ranging from irreversibility to hysteresis and to various mode transitions, depending on different physical parameters. With the model, we also illustrate the role of the instability of the normal shock wave in impacting the whole engine’s nonlinear dynamics. Additionally, we extend the previous studies of the classification of combustor-inlet interactions from a static framework to a dynamic framework, which helps to clarify the transient processes of the nonlinear interactions. This work offers a quantitative illustration of the combustor-inlet interactions in a ramjet engine by revealing its nonlinear dynamics and associated characteristics, therefore advancing our understanding of the nonlinear phenomena that exhibit in ramjet engines.

Keywords

Ramjet engineDynamic modelhysteresis
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 124 , Issue 1282 , December 2020 , pp. 2001 - 2018
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Zha, G.C., Knight, D., Smith, D. and Haas, M. Numerical simulation of high-speed civil transport inlet operability with angle of attack, AIAA J., 1998, 36, (7), pp 1223–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, J.Y., Jeung, I.S. and Yoon, Y. Numerical study of scram accelerator starting characteristics, AIAA J., 1998, 36, (6), pp 1029–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogawa, H. and Boyce, R.R. Physical insight into scramjet inlet behavior via multi-objective design optimization, AIAA J., 2012, 50, (8), pp 1773–1783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, W., Yan, L. and Tan, J.G. Survey on the mode transition technique in combined cycle propulsion systems, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2014, 39, pp 685–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullins, G.A. Demonstration of mode transition in a scramjet combustor, J. Propuls. Power, 1993, 9, (4), pp 515–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, J., Scheuermann, T., von Wolfersdorf, J. and Weigand, B. Experimental Study on Combustion Mode Transition in a Scramjet with Parallel Injection, AIAA 2006-8063, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, T., Novelli, P. and Haupt, M. Design Studies of the JAPHAR Experimental Vehicle for Dual Mode Ramjet Demonstration, AIAA 2001-1921, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goyne, C.P., McDaniel, J.C., Quagliaroli, T.M., Krauss, R.H. and Day, S.W. Dual-mode combustion of hydrogen in a mach 5, continuous-flow facility, J. Propuls. Power, 2001, 17, (6), pp 1313–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggins, D., Tackett, R., Taylor, T. and Auslender, A. Thermodynamic Analysis of Dual-Mode Scramjet Engine Operation and Performance, AIAA 2006-8059, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurence, S.J., Karl, S., Martinez Schramm, J. and Hannemann, K. Transient fluid-combustion phenomena in a model scramjet, J. Fluid Mech., 2013, 722, pp 85–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferri, A. Review of problems in application of supersonic combustion, J. R. Aeronaut. Soc., 1964, 68, (645), pp 575–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billig, F.S. and Dugger, G.L., The interaction of shock waves and heat addition in the design of supersonic combustors, Symp. Combust., 1969, 12, (1), pp 1125–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, E. Fluid phenomena in scramjet combustion systems, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 1996, 28, (1), pp 323–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimura, T., Mitani, T., Sakuranaka, N. and Izumikawa, M. Load oscillations caused by unstart of hypersonic wind tunnels and engines, J. Propuls. Power., 1998, 14, (3), pp 348–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’ Byrne, S., Doolan, M., Olsen, S.R. and Houwing, A.F.P. Analysis of transient thermal choking processes in a model scramjet engine, J. Propuls. Power., 2000, 16, (5), pp 808–814.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, K., Kanda, T., Tomioka, S., Tani, K., Sakuranaka, N. and Mitani, T. Suppression of combustor-inlet interaction in a scramjet engine under mach 4 flight conditions, Trans. Jpn. Soc. Aeronaut. Space Sci., 2007, 49, (166), pp 246–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santana, E.R. and Weigand, B. Numerical Investigations of Inlet-Combustor Interactions for a Scramjet Hydrogen-fueled engine at a Mach Flight Number of 8, AIAA 2012-5926, 2012.Google Scholar
Gamba, M., Miller, V., Mungal, G. and Hanson, R. Combustion characteristics of an inlet/supersonic combustor model, AIAA 2012-0612, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C.P., Sajben, M. and Kroutil, J.C. Shock-wave oscillations in a transonic diffuser flow, AIAA J., 1979, 17, (10), pp 1076–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogar, T.J., Sajben, M. and Kroutil, J.C. Characteristic frequencies of transonic diffuser flow oscillations, AIAA J., 1983, 21, (9), pp 1232–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sajben, M., Bogar, T.J. and Kroutil, J.C. Forced oscillation experiments in supercritical diffuser flows, AIAA J., 1984, 22, (4), pp 465–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogar, T.J., Sajben, M. and Kroutil, J.C. Response of a supersonic inlet to downstream perturbations, J. Propuls. Power., 1985, 1, (2), pp 118–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sajben, M., Bogar, T.J. and Kroutil, J.C., Experimental study of flows in a two-dimensional inlet model, J. Propuls. Power., 1985, 1, (2), pp 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wie, D.M., Kwok, F.T. and Walsh, R.F. Starting Characteristics of Supersonic Inlets, AIAA 1996-2914, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, T., Wang, Y. and Yu, D.R. Bistability and hysteresis in a nonlinear dynamic model of shock motion, J. Aircr., 2014, 51, (5), pp 1373–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culick, F.E.C. and Rogers, T. The response of normal shocks in diffusers, AIAA J., 1983, 21, (10), pp 1382–1390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, S.Y. and Yang, V. A unified analysis of unsteady flow structures in a supersonic ramjet engine, AIAA 1997-0396, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, T. and Tang, S. Geometry rule of combustor–inlet interaction in Ramjet engines, J. Propuls. Power., 2014, 30, (2), pp 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, T., Wang, Y., Liu, K. and Jin, J. Classification of combustor–inlet interactions for airbreathing Ramjet propulsion, AIAA J., 2015, 53, (8), pp 2237–2255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacMartin, D.G. Dynamics and control of shock motion in a near-isentropic inlet, J. Aircr., 2004, 41, (4), pp 846–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J.W., Park, I.S., Seo, B.G., Sung, H.G., Ananthkrishinan, N. and Tahk, M.J. Optimal terminal shock position under disturbances for ramjet supercritical operation, J. Propuls. Power., 2012, 29, (1), pp 238–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, I.S., Kim, S.K., Yeom, H.W., Sung, H.G., Park, J.W. and Tahk, M.J. Control-oriented model for intake shock position dynamics in ramjet engine, J. Propuls. Power., 2011, 27, (2), pp 499–502.Google Scholar
Tournes, C., Landrum, D.B., Shtessel, Y. and Hawk, C.W. Ramjet-powered reusable launch vehicle control by sliding modes, J. Guid. Control. Dyn., 1998, 21, (3), pp 409–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, K.P.B., Gupta, N.K., Ananthkrishnan, N., Park, I.S. and Yoon, H.G. Modeling, simulation, and controller design for an air-breathing combustion system, J. Propuls. Power., 2010, 26, (3), pp 562–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar