Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:20:17.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Body-Wing Interference at Supersonic Speeds

Part I. Pressure Distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

J. E. Phythian
J. E. Phythian*
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, University College, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A summary of available information on the problem of body-wing interference in supersonic flow has shown, inter alia, that a large number of theoretical methods are available for the prediction of interference characteristics. Many of these methods are chiefly concerned with the estimation of overall characteristics, i.e. normal force and pitching moment. Several methods are available to determine the pressure distribution for restricted types of configurations, but these often involve lengthy computation.

It is the aim of this paper (Part I) to summarise a simple yet reasonably accurate method of estimating the pressure distribution and hence (in Part II) the overall characteristics of as general a body-wing configuration as possible. The method which applies essentially to a cropped-delta wing symmetrically mounted on a cylindrical body, achieves reasonable accuracy without considerable computational effort; it is based on certain theoretical results together with empirical modifications. The results for pressure are generally valid up to an angle of incidence, α=6° —8° and in some cases for higher values of α. The overall normal force and centre of pressure position should hold up to α= 10°.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 70 , Issue 664 , April 1966 , pp. 497 - 505
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Lawrence, H. R. and Flax, A. H.Body-Wing Interference at Subsonic and Supersonic Speeds—Survey and New Developments. J Aero Sci, Vol 21, No 5, May 1954.Google Scholar
2.Morikawa, G. The Body-Wing Problem for Linearized Supersonic Flow. JPL CIT Report 4-116, December 1949.Google Scholar
3.Nielsen, J. N. and Pitts, W. C. Body-Wing Interference at Supersonic Speeds with an Application to Combinations with Rectangular Wings. NACA TN 2677, April 1952.Google Scholar
4.Bolton Skaw, B. W. The Lifting Pressure Distribution on a Finite Wing with Supersonic Leading Edge due to the Upwash Field of a Body. English Electric Report LAt 0.33 and LAt 0.35, 1952.Google Scholar
5.Lock, R. C.An Extension to the Linearized Theory of Supersonic Flow past Quasi-Cylindrical Bodies, with Applications to Body-Wing Interference. J Fluid Mechanics, Vol 4, p 33, 1958.Google Scholar
6.Phythian, J. E. Part II of this paper: Overall Body-Wing Characteristics. To be published in the J Roy Aero Soc.Google Scholar
7.Moskowitz, B. and Maslen, S. H. Experimental Pressure Distributions over two Wing Body Combinations at M=l·9. NACA RM E50J09 TIB2613, December 1951.Google Scholar
8.Spreiter, J. R. Aerodynamic Properties of Slender Wing Body Combinations at Subsonic, Transonic and Supersonic Speeds. NACA TN 1662, July 1948.Google Scholar
9.Lagerstrom, P. A. and Graham, M. E., Downwash and Sidewash Induced by Three-dimensional Lifting Wings in Supersonic Flow. Douglas Aircraft Co Report No SM- 13007 P.17302, April 1947.Google Scholar
10.Mirels, H. and Haefeli, R. C. Line Vortex Theory for the Calculation of Supersonic Downwash. NACA TN 1925, 1949.Google Scholar
11.Haefeli, R. C.,Mirels, H. and Cummings, J. L. Charts for Estimating Downwash behind Rectangular, Trapezoidal and Triangular Wings at Supersonic Speeds. NACA TN 2141, August 1950.Google Scholar
12.Nielsen, J. N., Pitts, W. C. and Gionfriddo, M. P. Comparison between Theory and Experiment for the Inter ference Pressure Field between Wing and Body at Supersonic Speeds. NACA TN 3128, April 1954.Google Scholar
13.Beskin, L. Determination of Upwash around a Body of Revolution at Supersonic Velocities. APL/JHU CM-121, May 1946.Google Scholar
14.Cramer, R. H. Body Wing Interference—Experimental Results. A paper appearing in Navy Symposium on Aeroballistics, May 1952 (P.37963C).Google Scholar
15.Cramer, R. H. Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Body Wing Interference at Supersonic Speeds. A paper appearing in Navy Bureau Symposium on Aeroballistics, Vol II, November 1950 (DLR-267).Google Scholar
16. Royal Aeronautical Society Data Sheets—Wing Alone section.Google Scholar
17.Ferrari, C. Interference between Wing and Body at Supersonic Speeds. Part I—Theory and Numerical Application. J Aero Sci, Vol 15, No 6, June 1948; also CAL (CM.419). See also J Aero Sci, Vol 16, No 9, p 542 and Vol 17, No 7, p 453.Google Scholar
18.Stewart, H. J. and Meghreblian, R. V. Body Wing Interference in Supersonic Flow. JPL/CIT Report 4-99, 1949.Google Scholar
19.Cramer, R. H. Some Theoretical and Experimental Results for Body Wing Interference at Supersonic Velocities. Paper in Bumblebee Aerodynamics Symposium, November 1948 (APL/JHU TG 10-4) and supplement TG 10-4A.Google Scholar
20.Landers, E. R. A. Free Transition Pressure Distributions on a Wing-Body Combination at Mach Numbers of 2·00 and 2·58. Australian Defence Scientific Service Tech Memo HSA79 (P 130363), July 1960.Google Scholar
21.Landers, E. R. A. Experimental Pressure Distributions on a Delta Wing and Body Combination at Mach Numbers of 2·00 and 2·58. Aust Defence Sci Service Tech Memo HSA 91 (P 13037), August 1961.Google Scholar