Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:52:06.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bio-inspired design of flapping-wing micro air vehicles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

K. D. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Astronautical Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA
C. J. Bradshaw
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Astronautical Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA
J. Papadopoulos
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Astronautical Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA
M. F. Platzer
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Astronautical Engineering, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA

Abstract

In this paper the development and flight testing of flapping-wing propelled, radio-controlled micro air vehicles are described. The unconventional vehicles consist of a low aspect ratio fixed-wing with a trailing pair of higher aspect ratio flapping wings which flap in counterphase. The symmetric flapping-wing pair provides a mechanically and aerodynamically balanced platform, increases efficiency by emulating flight in ground effect, and suppresses stall over the main wing by entraining flow. The models weigh as little as 11g, with a 23cm span and 18cm length and will fly for about 20 minutes on a rechargeable battery. Stable flight at speeds between 2 and 5ms–1 has been demonstrated, and the models are essentially stall-proof while under power. The static-thrust figure of merit for the device is 60% higher than propellers with a similar scale and disk loading.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2005 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Woods, M.I., Henderson, J.F. and Lock, G.D.. Energy requirements for the flight of micro air vehicles, 2001, Aero J, 105, (1045), pp 135149.Google Scholar
2. Keennon, M.T. and Grasmeyer, J.M.. Development of the Black Widow and Microbat MAVs and a vision of the future of MAV design, 2003, AIAA Paper No 2003-3327.Google Scholar
3. Chronister, N.. Ornithopter media collection, 2001, http://www.ornothopter.org/rubber.html.Google Scholar
4. Bridges, A.. Flying robots create a buzz, Monterey County Herald, 28 July, 2002.Google Scholar
5. Jones, K.D., Lund, T.C. and Platzer, M.F.. Experimental and Computational Investigation of Flapping-Wing Propulsion for Micro Air Vehicles, 2001, Chapter 16, Fixed and Flapping Wing Aerodynamics for Micro Air Vehicle Applications, AIAA Progress in Aerospace Sciences Series, Mueller, T. (Ed), 195.Google Scholar
6. Jones, K.D. and Platzer, M.F.. Experimental investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of flapping-wing micro air vehicles, AIAA Paper No 2003-0418, 2003.Google Scholar
7. Jones, K.D., Dohring, C.M. and Platzer, M.F.. An experimental and computational investigation of the Knoller-Betz effect, AIAA J, 1998, 36, (7), pp 12401246.Google Scholar
8. Lai, J.C.S., Yue, J. and Platzer, M.F.. Control of backward facing step flow using a flapping airfoil, Experiments in Fluids, 2002, 32, pp 4454.Google Scholar
9. Dohring, C.M., Fottner, L. and Platzer, M.F.. Experimental and numerical investigation of flapping wing propulsion and its application for boundary layer control, 1998, ASME International Gas Turbine Congress, 98-GT-046.Google Scholar
10. Jones, K.D., Castro, B.M., Mahmoud, O. and Platzer, M.F.. A numerical and experimental investigation of flapping-wing propulsion in ground effect, 2002, AIAA Paper No 2002-0866.Google Scholar
11. Carr, L.W. and Chandrasekhara, M.S.. Compressibility effects on dynamic stall, Progress in Aerospace Sciences,, 1996 32, pp 523573.Google Scholar
12. Mccroskey, W.J.. Unsteady airfoils, Ann Rev Fluid Mech, 1982, 14, pp 285311.Google Scholar
13. Tuncer, I.H., Lai, J.C.S. and Platzer, M.F.. A computational study of flow reattachment over a stationary/flapping airfoil combination in tandem, 1998, AIAA Paper No 98-0109.Google Scholar
14. Castro, B.M.. Multi-block Parallel Navier-Stokes Simulations of Unsteady Wind Tunnel and Ground Interference Effects, 2001, PhD thesis, Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics, Naval Postgraduate School.Google Scholar
15. Cylinder, D., Srull, D. and Kellogg, J.. Biomorphic approaches to micro air vehicles, 2003, UAV Asia-Pacific 2003 Conference.Google Scholar
16. Laitone, E.V.. Wind tunnel tests of wings and rings at low Reynolds numbers, Chapter 5, Fixed and Flapping Wing Aerodynamics for Micro Air Vehicle Applications, AIAA Progress in Aerospace Sciences Series, Mueller, T. (Ed), 195, pp 8390.Google Scholar
17. Torres, G.E. and Mueller, T.J.. Aerodynamic characteristics of low aspect ratio wings at low Reynolds numbers, 2001, Chapter 7, Fixed and Flapping Wing Aerodynamics for Micro Air Vehicle Applications, AIAA Progress in Aerospace Sciences Series, Mueller, T. (Ed), 195, pp 115142.Google Scholar
18. Kornbluh, R. D., Low, T. P., Stanford, S. E., Vinande, E., Bonwit, N., Holeman, D., Delaurier, J. D., Loewen, D., Zdunich, P., Macmaster, M. and Bilyk, D.. Flapping-wing propulsion using electroactive polymer artificial muscle actuators, Phase 2: radio-controlled flapping-wing testbed, 2002, SRI International Report ITAD-3470-FR-03-009.Google Scholar
19. Papadopoulos, J.P.. An Experimental Investigation of the Geometric Characteristics of Flapping-wing Propulsion for a Micro Air Vehicle, 2003, Master’s thesis, Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics, Naval Postgraduate School.Google Scholar
20. Bradshaw, C.J.. An Experimental Investigation of Flapping Wing Aerodynamics in Micro Air Vehicles, 2003, Master’s thesis, Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics, Naval Postgraduate School.Google Scholar