Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:45:48.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The accuracy of flat plate, turbulent skin friction at supersonic speeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

L. C. Squire
L. C. Squire*
Affiliation:
Cambridge University Engineering Department, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison of turbulent skin-friction coefficients measured by floating element balances in zero pressure gradient conditions for a wide range of Mach numbers and Reynolds numbers. From these comparisons it is clear that although a large number of measurements have been made it is impossible to use these measurements to find the skin-friction coefficient for a given Mach number and Reynolds number to an accuracy of better than ±2 to 3%. This estimate of accuracy applies only to the range of Mach numbers and Reynolds within which there are a reasonable number of measurements to compare. Outside this range, say for Reynolds numbers based on momentum thickness greater than 40,000 and Mach numbers greater than 2 the uncertainty is greater.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 104 , Issue 1036 , June 2000 , pp. 257 - 263
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2000 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Huang, P.G., Bradshaw, P. and Coakley, T.J. Skin friction and velo city profile family for compressible boundary Layers, AIAA J. 1993, 33, pp 1600–1604.Google Scholar
2. Motallebi, F. Reynolds number effects on the prediction of mean flow data for adiabatic 2D compressible boundary layers, Aeronaut J, 1996, 100, pp 53–59.Google Scholar
3. Van Driest, E.R. Turbulent boundary layers in compressible fluids, J Aeronautical Sci, 1951, 18, pp 145–160.Google Scholar
4. Spaldfng, D.B. and Chi, S.W. The drag of a compressible boundary layer on smooth flat plate with and without heat transfer, J Fluid Mech, 1964, 8, pp 117–143.Google Scholar
5. Winter, K.G. and Gaudet , L. Turbulent boundary-layer studies at high Reynolds numbers at Mach numbers between 0.2 and 2.8 ARC R & M 3712, 1970.Google Scholar
6. Fernholz, H.H. and Finley, P.J. A critical compilation of compressible boundary layer data. AGARD Report Ag-223, 1977.Google Scholar
7. White, F.M. and Christoph, G.H. J Basic Engineering, 1972, 94, pp 636–642.Google Scholar
8. Mabey, D.G. Experimental Studies of the boundary layer on a flat plate at Mach numbers from 2.5 to 4.5, ARC R&M 3784, 1976.Google Scholar
9. Mabey, D.G. Some observations on the wake component of the veloc ity profiles of turbulent boundary layers at subsonic and supersonic speeds. Royal Aircraft Establishment Tech Report 77004, 1977.Google Scholar
10. Fernholz, H.H. and Finley, P.J., A further compilation of compressible boundary layer data with a survey of turbulence data AGARD Report Ag-263, 1981.Google Scholar
11. Gaudet, L. Experimental investigation of the turbulent boundary layer at High Reynolds numbers and a Mach number of 0.8. Royal Aircraft Establishment Tech Report 84094. 1984.Google Scholar
12. Fernholz, H.H. and Finley, P.J. A critical commentary on mean flow data for two-dimensional compressible turbulent boundary layers. AGARD Report Ag-253, 1980.Google Scholar