Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:04:22.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The removal of wind tunnel panels to prevent flow breakdown at low speeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

R. E. Hansford*
Affiliation:
Westland Helicopters Ltd.

Extract

The testing of model rotors in closed throat wind tunnels is known to present major problems in the form of tunnel wall interference when operating at low speed. However, it is precisely this region of the aircraft's flight envelope which is of prime importance when investigating areas such as transitional flight, hovering in winds and tail rotor performance and handling qualities. Although much work has been carried out in the past to determine wall interference factors for various model and tunnel configurations, there still exists a problem of flow breakdown due to the presence of tunnel boundaries, for which no corrections are possible. The aim of this experiment was to conduct a short and simple investigation, first to identify the flow breakdown condition for a finite sized rotor in a closed tunnel, then to assess the feasibility of at least delaying the onset of this limiting condition by selectively removing panels from the walls of the working section. Since the experiment was designed only to study gross flow effects, no attempt was made to include wall interference factors.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1975 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Heyson, H. H. Linearised theory of wind tunnel jet-boundary corrections and ground effect for VTOL/STOL aircraft. NASA TR 124, 1962.Google Scholar
2. Rae, W. H. Jr Limits in minimum-speed V/STOL wind tunnel tests. Journal of Aircraft, May 1967.Google Scholar
3. Jacobs, E. N. and Sherman, A. Airfoil section character istics as affected by variations of the Reynolds number. NACA Report No 586, June 1936.Google Scholar