Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:41:09.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Performance of Glare panels subjected to intense pressure pulse loading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

C. Soutis*
Affiliation:
The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
G. Mohamed*
Affiliation:
The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
A. Hodzic*
Affiliation:
The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK

Abstract

A robust and efficient computational model has been developed which is capable of modelling the dynamic non-linear behaviour of Glare panels subjected to blast loadings. High strain rate material characterisation and modelling of interfacial debonding between adjacent sublaminates have been taken into consideration. Numerical model validation have been performed considering case studies of Glare panels subjected to a blast-type pressure pulse for which experimental data on the back face- displacement and post-damage observations were available. Excellent agreement of mid-point deflections and evidence of severe yield line deformation were shown and discussed against the performed blast tests. A further parametric study identified Glare as a potential blast attenuating structure, exhibiting superior blast potential against monolithic aluminium plates. The results were normalised and showed that for a given impulse, Glare exhibited a smaller normalised displacement, outperforming monolithic Aluminium 2024-T3 plates. It was concluded that further work needed to be carried out to take into account the influence of geometry (cylindrical structures), pre-pressurisation effects and boundary conditions

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Soutis, C. Recent advances in building with composites, Plastics, Rubber and Composites, 2009, 38, (9-10), pp 59366.Google Scholar
2. Vlot, A. and Gunnink, J.W. Fibre Metal Laminates: An Introduction, Springer, 2001.Google Scholar
3. Vlot, A. Impact loading on fibre metal laminates, Int J Impact Engineering, 1996, 18, (3), pp 291307.Google Scholar
4. Hoo, F., Michelle, S., Lin, Chunfu, Revilock, D.M. and Hopkins, D.A. Ballistic impact of Glare fiber-metal laminates, Composite Structures, 2003, 61, (1-2), pp 7388.Google Scholar
5. McCarthy, M.A., Xiao, J.R., Petrinic, N., Kamoulakos, A. and Melito, V. Modelling of bird strike on an aircraft wing leading edge made from fibre metal laminates-part 1: material modeling, Applied composite materials, Springer, 11, (5), pp 295315.Google Scholar
6. McMullin, D. Lockerbie Insurance, Scientific American Magazine, January 2002.Google Scholar
7. Fleisher, H.J. Design and explosive testing of a blast resistant luggage container, Proc structures under shock and impact conference IV, 1996.Google Scholar
8. Ndambi, J.M. and Dewolf, K. and Vantomme, J. VULCAN Deliverable 2.4: Experimental results for blast behaviour of flat panels, Belgian Royal Military Academy, 2008.Google Scholar
9. Langdon, G.S., Chi, Y., Nurick, G.N. and Haupt, P. Response of Glare panels to blast loading, Engineering Structures, 2009.Google Scholar
10. Karagiozova, D., Langdon, G.S., Nurick, G.N. and Chung Kim Yuen, S. Simulation of the response of fibre-metal laminates to localised blast loading, Int J Impact Engineering, 2010, 37, pp 766782.Google Scholar
11. Langdon, G.S., Lemanski, S.L., Nurick, G.N., Simmons, M.C., Cantwell, W.J and Schleyer, G.K. Behaviour of fibre-metal laminates subjVol.cted to localised blast loading: Part I-Experimental observations, Int J impact Eng, 2007, 34, pp 12021222.Google Scholar
12. LS-DYNA Keyword Users Manual-Version 971, 2007.Google Scholar
13. Hagenbeek, M. Characterisation of fibre metal laminates under thermo-mechanical loadings, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 2005.Google Scholar
14. Linde, P. and de Boer, H. Modelling of inter – rivet buckling of hybrid composites, Composite Structure, 2006, 73, pp 221228.Google Scholar
15. Chang, F.K. and Chang, K.Y. Post-failure analysis of bolted composite joints in tension or shear-out mode failure, J Composite Materials, 1987, 21, (809).Google Scholar
16. Tsai, S.W. and Wu, E.M. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials, J Composite Materials, 1971, 5, p 58.Google Scholar
17. Johnson, G.R. and Cook, W.H. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures, Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, 1983.Google Scholar
18. Ravichandran, G., Rosakis, A.J., Hodowany, J. and Rosakis, P. On the conversion of plastic work into heat during high-strain-rate deformation, American Institute of Physics, 2002.Google Scholar
19. Buyuk, M., Kan, S. and Loikkanen, M.J. Explicit finite-element analysis of 2024-T3/T351 aluminum material under Impact loading for airplane engine containment and fragment shielding, J Aerospace Eng, 2009, 22, pp 287295.Google Scholar
20. Karagiozova, D., Nurick, G.N. and Langdon, G.S. Behaviour of sandwich panels subject to intense air blasts-Part 2: Numerical simulation, Composite Structures, 2009, 91, pp 442450.Google Scholar
21. Nurick, G.N. and Martin, J.B. Deformation of thin plates subjected to impulsive loading – a review Part II: Experimental studies, Int J Impact Eng, 1989, 8, pp 171186.Google Scholar
22. Jacob, N., Nurick, G.N and Langdon, G.S. The effect of stand-off distance on the failure of fully clamped circular mild steel plates subjected to blast loads, Engineering Structures, 2007, 29, pp 27232736.Google Scholar