Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:46:56.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Aerodynamic Design of Slender Wings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

E. C. Maskell  and
J. Weber
E. C. Maskell
Affiliation:
Aerodynamics Department, Royal Aircraft Establishment
J. Weber
Affiliation:
Aerodynamics Department, Royal Aircraft Establishment
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary:

—Since flow separation occurs readily from a highly swept leading edge, but gives rise in general to a steady flow, it is proposed that the rational approach to the aerodynamic design of slender wings is to attempt to control, rather than to suppress, these separations. This leads to the suggestion that the leading edges should be sharp, and that the wing should be shaped so as to make them attachment lines at one attitude (the design attitude) at which classical wing theory can be applied. It is argued, further, that if the leading edge separations are to develop regularly with change of attitude of the wing, separation must occur only from the trailing edge at the design attitude; and the velocity field favourable to boundary layer development without separation forward of the trailing edge is discussed. Subject to the restrictions thus imposed on the design, low drag is sought at the design attitude. This leads to the consideration of a particular class of doubly curved mean surfaces satisfying the leading edge condition, onto which thickness distributions are superposed so as to provide favourable velocity fields together with low drag. A number of examples are considered, using slender thin wing theory for flexibility, to illustrate the manner in which plan form and thickness distributions affect the pressure distribution, and to indicate the relatively high lift/drag ratios which seem feasible. Some consideration is given to the limitations of the theory used and to the further developments which seem desirable.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 63 , Issue 588 , December 1959 , pp. 709 - 721
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Maskell, E. C. (1955). Flow Separation in Three Dimensions. Unpublished M.o.S. Report, November 1955.Google Scholar
2.Legendre, R. (1952-3). Ecoulement au Voisinage de la Pointe Avant d'une Aile a Forte Fleche aux Incidences Moyennes. La Recherche Aeronautique (O.N.E.R.A.) No. 30, 1952, Nos. 31 and 35, 1953.Google Scholar
3.Brown, C. E., Michael, W. H. (1954). On Slender Delta Wings With Leading Edge Separation. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 21, p. 690. October 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Mangler, K. W., Smith, J. H. B. (1956). A Theory of Slender Delta Wings With Leading Edge Separation. Unpublished M.o.S. Report, April 1956.Google Scholar
5.Mangler, K. W., and Smith, J. H. B. (1959). A Theory of Flow past a Slender Delta Wing with Leading Edge Separation. Proc. Roy. Soc. A251, pp. 200–217, May 1959.Google Scholar
6.Kuchemann, D. (1955). A non-linear Lifting Surface Theory for Wings of Small Aspect Ratio With Edge Separations. Unpublished M.o.S. Report, April 1955.Google Scholar
7.ADAMS, , MACC, , SEARS, W. R. (1953). Slender-Body Theory—Review and Extension. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 20, p. 85, February 1953.Google Scholar
8.Ward, G. N. (1949). Supersonic Flow Past Slender Pointed Bodies. Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 2, p. 75, 1949.Google Scholar
9.Lighthill, M. J. (1956). The Wave Drag at Zero Lift of Slender Delta Wings and Similar Configurations. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. Vol. 1, Part 3, p. 337, September 1956.Google Scholar
10.Jones, R. T. (1950). Leading-Edge Singularities in Thin- Airfoil Theory. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 17, p. 307. May 1950.Google Scholar
11.Pucket, A. E. (1946). Supersonic Wave Drag of Thin Aerofoils. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences. Vol. 13, p. 475, 1946.Google Scholar
12.Henderson, A. (1952). Supersonic Wave Drag of Non- Lifting Delta Wings With Linearly Varying Thickness Ratio. N.A.C.A. Tech. Note 2858. December 1952.Google Scholar
13.Weber, J. (1957). Slender Delta Wings With Sharp Edges at Zero Lift. Unpublished M.o.S. Report), May 1957.Google Scholar
14.Drougge, G., Larson, P. D. (1956). Pressure Measurements and Flow Investigation on Delta Wings at Supersonic Speed. F.F.A. Report No. 57, November 1956.Google Scholar
15.Lord, W. T., Brebner, G. G. (1959). Supersonic Flow past Slender Pointed Wings with “Similar” Cross-Sections at Zero Lift. Aeronautical Quarterly, Vol. X, p. 79, February 1959.Google Scholar
16.Jones, R. T. (1951). The Minimum Drag of Thin Wings in Frictionless Flow. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, Vol 18, p. 75, February 1951.Google Scholar
17.Smith, J. H. B., Mangler, K. W. (1957). The Use of Conical Camber to Produce Flow Attachment at the Leading Edge of a Delta Wing and to Minimise Lift-Dependent Drag at Sonic and Supersonic Speeds. To be published in the R. & M. Series.Google Scholar
18.Roper, G. M. (1958). Use of Camber and Twist to Produce Low Drag Delta or Sweptback Wings Without Leading Edge Singularities at Supersonic Speeds. Unpublished M.o.S. Report, December 1958.Google Scholar
19.Weber, J. (1957). Design of Warped Slender Wings With the Attachment Line Along the Leading Edge. Unpublished M.o.S. Report, September 1957.Google Scholar