Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T22:53:43.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Naval Architecture in Aeronautics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2016

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Proceedings
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 24 , Issue 115 , July 1920 , pp. 321 - 405
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1920

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note on page 324 (1) Bouguer, “ Traité du navire,” Paris, 1746.

L. Euler, “ Scientia Navalis,” St. Petersburg, 1749.

Atwood, “ Stability of Ships,” London, 1796.

Chas. Dupin, “ Applications de Géometrie et de mecanique à la Marine,” Paris, 1822.

P. J. Moreau, “ Principes fondamentaux de l'equilibre,” etc., Lorient, 1830.

J. M. C. Duhamel, La stabilité des corps flottants,” Paris, 1832.

H. Moseley, “ On the Dynamical Stability and on the Oscillations of Floating Bodies,” London, 1874.

F. K. Barnes, “ On the Metacentre and Metacentric Curves,” “ Naval Science,” Vol. III., London, 1850.

E. J. Reed, “ A Treatise on the Stability of Ships,” London, 1885.

Note on page 325 (1) D. Bernoulli (Prix de 1'Academie des sciences), Paris* 1757.

Dupuy de Lôme, “ Mem. G.M.,” Vol. IV., Paris, 1859.

Wm. Froude, “ Proc. Inst. Nav. Arch.,” Vols. II., III., IV., XIV., XVI., London.

Rankinc, “Proc. Inst. Nav. Arch.,” Vols. V., XII., London.

Scott Russcl, “ Proc. Inst. Nav. Arch.,” Vol. IV., London.

Bertin, “ Les vagucs et le roulis,” Berger-Levraut, Paris, 1877.

Reech, “ Thérie du roulis, etc.,” Paris, 1870.

Note on page 325 (2) Bryan, G. H., “Stability in Aviation,” Macmillan, London, 1911 Google Scholar.

Note on page 325 (3) L. Bairstow, Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, R. & M., 116—122, London, 1914.

Note on page 326 (1) A positive value of Mw in Bairstow's notation.

Note on page 326 (2) Hunsaker, “Dynamical Stability of Aeroplanes,” Smithsonian Misc. Coll., Vol. LXII, No. 5.

Note on page 332 (1) Leclert, “ Naval Science,” April—October, 1872.

Note on page 335 * I am indebted to my assistant, Lieut. R. D. MacCart, for help in the preparation of this Appendix.

Note on page 367 * I am indebted to my assistant, R. B. Beisel, B.S., for help in the preparation of this Appendix.

Note on page 377 (1) “ Stabiliser and Elevator Pressure Distribution,” Bulletin of the Experimental Department, Airplane Engineering Division, U.S.A., Vol. II., No. 3, December, 1918.

Note on page 379 (2) “ Airplane Control Surfaces,” J. C. Hunsaker and T. H. Huff, “ Aviation,” Vol. I., No. 5, . October 1, 1916.

Note on page 380 (1) Formules Approximatives de Construction Navale, Paris, 1870.

Etude sur les Torpilleurs (translation), Office of Naval Intelligence, U.S., General Information Series, Washington, 1886.

The Displacement and Dimensions of Ships, Int.Eng. Congress, Glasgow, 1901.

Note on page 380 (2) I am indebted to Mr. C. P. Burgess for assistance in applying Normand's equation to airships, and I have also had access to Professor Hovgaard's manuscript for his forthcoming book, “ General Design of Warships,” Spon, London.

Note on page 383 (1) Proof of this formula seems unnecessary. A somewhat similar form has been shown by Cole, “ Aeronautical Journal,” March, 1920, and by Campbell, Inst. of Nav. Arch., March 25, 1920. The exact form here used applies to the case of uniform lateral load on a wire initially just taut.

Note on page 384 (1) There is some reason to believe that r is increased for L/D below 5.5 and above 8.5. For the usual range of ship forms the change is small and rather uncertain.

Note on page 385 (1) A. P. Cole, Aeronautical Journal, p. 118, March, 1920.

Note on Page 393 (1) W. Hovgaard, “ General Design of Warships,” Spon, London, 1920.

Note on Page 393 (2) C. R. Campbell, “ Inst. Nav. Arch.,” London, March, 1920.

Note on Page 393 * I am indebted to my assistant, Lieut. C. B. Harper, for help in the preparation of this Appendix.

Note on Page 399 (1) H. C. Richardson, Society Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, New York, Nov., 1916.

G. S. Baker, “ Flying Boats,” etc., North-East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders, Newcastle, Februarv 27, 1920.

Note on Page 405 (1) Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, R. & M. 469.

Note on Page 405 (2) A. F. Zahm, “ Journal of the Franklin Institute,” Philadelphia, August, 1919.

Note on Page 405 (3) G. S. Baker, Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, R. & M. 583.