Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:09:38.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Moving-mass-based station keeping of stratospheric airships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2021

L. Chen*
Affiliation:
School of Air Transportation, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, China State Key Laboratory of Robotics, Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, China
Q. Gao
Affiliation:
School of Air Transportation, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, China
Y. Deng
Affiliation:
School of Air Transportation, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, China
J. Liu
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Robotics, Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, China

Abstract

Stratospheric airships are lighter-than-air vehicles that work at an altitude of 20km in the lower calm portion of the stratosphere. They can be used as real-time surveillance platforms for environment monitoring and civil communication. Solar energy is the ideal power choice for long-endurance stratospheric airships. Attitude control is important for airships so that they can point at a target for observation or adjust the attitude to improve the output performance of solar panels. Stratospheric airships have a large volume and semi-flexible structure. The typical actuators used are aerodynamic surfaces, vectored thrust and ballonets. However, not all these actuators can work well under special working conditions, such as low density and low speed. In this study, moving-mass control is introduced to stratospheric airships because its control efficiency is independent of airspeed and atmospheric density. A nonlinear feedback controller based on generalised inverse with a nonlinear mapping module is designed to implement moving-mass control. Such a new station keeping scheme with moving masses is proposed for airships with different working situations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal Aeronautical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Schmidt, D.K. Modeling and near-space station-keeping control of a large high-altitude airship. J Guid Contr Dynam, 2007, 30, (2), pp 540547.10.2514/1.24865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X.W., Yang, X.X. and Deng, X.L. Horizontal trajectory control of stratospheric airships in wind field using Q-learning algorithm. Aerosp Sci Technol, 2020, 106, pp 106100.10.1016/j.ast.2020.106100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y.Y., Li, J., Lv, M.Y., Tan, D.J., Zhu, W.Y. and Sun, K.W. Simplified analytical model for investigating the output power of solar array on stratospheric airship. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci, 2016, 17, (3), pp 432441.10.5139/IJASS.2016.17.3.432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X.X. and Liu, D.N. Renewable power system simulation and endurance analysis for stratospheric airships. Renew Energy, 2017, 113, (12), pp 10701076.10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Z.W., Chen, T., Xu, M. and Zhu, M. Modeling and path-following control of a vector-driven stratospheric satellite. Adv Space Res, 57, (9), 19011913, 2016.10.1016/j.asr.2016.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y.Y. Positioning control for stratospheric satellites subject to dynamics uncertainty and input constraints. Aerosp Sci Technol, 2019, 86, pp 534541.10.1016/j.ast.2019.01.045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Wu, Y.L. and Hu, Y.M. Autonomous dynamics-modeling and feedback control for an airship. Control Theory Appl, 2010, 27, (8), pp 991997.Google Scholar
Fan, Y.H., Yu, Y.F. and Yan, J. High altitude satellite altitude control system design and simulation. Sci Technol Eng, 2011, 11, (24), pp 59575961.Google Scholar
Guo, J.G. and Zhou, J. Compound control system of stratospheric satellite based on aircrew systems. J Astronaut, 2009, 30, (1), pp 225230.Google Scholar
Di, X.G., Han, F. and Yao, Y. Attitude control allocation strategy of high altitude satellite based on synthetic performance optimization. J Harbin Inst Technol, 2009, 16, (6), pp 746750.Google Scholar
Chen, L., Dong, Q., Zhang, G. and Duan, D. Composite control system of hybrid-driven mid-altitude airship. Aeronaut J, 122, (1248), 173204, 2018.10.1017/aer.2017.125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, J.E. and Robinett, R.D. Principal axis misalignment control for deconing of spinning spacecraft. J Guid Control Dyn, 1994, 17, (4), pp 823830.10.2514/3.21272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, F.J. and Kavetsky, R.A. Add-on controller for ballistic reentry vehicles: USA patent, 1984, pp 752–766.Google Scholar
Woolsey, C.A. and Leonard, N.E. Moving mass control for underwater vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference, IEEE, Anchorage, 2002, pp 2824–2829.10.1109/ACC.2002.1025217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menon, P.K. and Sweriduk, G.D. Integrated guidance and control of moving-mass actuated kinetic warheads. J Guid Control Dyn, 2004, 27, (1), pp 118126.10.2514/1.9336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, Y.G., Gu, W.J., Zhao, H.C. and Yu, J.Y. Research on composite control of mass/thrust vectoring for a kind of saucer-like air vehicle. Flight Dyn, 23, (3), pp 2831, 2005.Google Scholar
Vaddi, S.S. Moving mass actuated missile control using convex optimization techniques. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Keystone, Colorado, 2006, pp 1–13.10.2514/6.2006-6575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, M.W. and Shan, X.X. By changing position research of satellite’s center of gravity to control longitudinal motion. Chin Q Mech, 2006, 27, (4), pp 714718.Google Scholar
Chen, L., Zhou, G., Yan, X.J. and Duan, D.P. Composite control strategy of stratospheric airships with moving masses. J Aircr, 2012, 49, (3), pp 794800.10.2514/1.C031364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L., Zhou, H., Wen, Y.B. and Duan, D.P. Control of the horizontal position of a stratospheric airship during ascent and descent. Aeronaut J, 2015, 119, (1214), pp 523541.10.1017/S0001924000010599CrossRefGoogle Scholar