Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T08:06:10.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A first order method for the determination of the leading mass characteristics of civil transport aircraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2016

D. I. A. Poll
D. I. A. Poll*
Affiliation:
Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, UK
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Simple, approximate relations are developed that allow rapid, yet accurate, estimates of the principal mass characteristics of modern civil transport aircraft. The method is based upon an ‘aircraft mass hypothesis’ combined with data taken from Type Certificates and manufacturers’ information for 44 different Boeing and Airbus aircraft types and variants. This hypothesis links the masses of the various aircraft components, including the operational items, and the maximum payload mass to just two parameters; the passenger cabin floor area, as exemplified by the ‘design passenger number’ and the ratio of maximum zero fuel mass to maximum take-off mass, as exemplified by the non-dimensional ‘design range’. In this context, the ‘design range’ is defined as the maximum possible range when the aircraft is operating at its maximum zero fuel mass. This approach leads to the formulation of three basic ‘laws’ for aircraft mass. Special consideration is given to the identification and separation of those components that are fixed either by the design, or the certification process, and those that are free, within defined limits, to be chosen by the operator.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 115 , Issue 1167 , May 2011 , pp. 257 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Type Certificate Data Sheet No.FA28 Boeing 757-200 747 300 Series, Issue 5, UK Civil Aviation Authority, February 2001. (http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/1419/SRG_ACP_TCDS_Index_07-032006.pdf) Google Scholar
2. 777-200LR/-300ER/-Freighter Airplane. Characteristics for Airport Planning, Boeing Commercial Airplanes, D6-58329-2, August 2009 (http://www.boeing.com/commercial/airports/acaps/777rsec2.pdf)Google Scholar
3. Jane’s All the World’s Aircraft (http://jawa.janes.com/public/jawa/index.shtml)Google Scholar
4. Jenkinson, L.R., Simpkin, P. and Rhodes, D. Civil Jet Aircraft Design, Arnold, 1999, ISBN 0 340 74152 X.Google Scholar
5. Howe, D. Aircraft Conceptual Design Synthesis, Professional Engineering Publishing Limited, 2000, ISBN 1 86058 301 6.Google Scholar
6. Raymer, D.P. Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, AIAA Educational Series, 1989, ISBN 0 930403 51 7.Google Scholar
7. Torenbeek, E. Synthesis of Subsonic Airplane Design, Kluwer Academic Press, 1988, ISBN 90 247 2724 3.Google Scholar
8. Küchemann, D. and Weber, J. An analysis of some performance aspects of various types of aircraft designed to fly over different ranges at different speeds, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1968, 9, pp 329–456.Google Scholar
9. Green, J.E. Greener by Design – the technology challenge, Aeronaut J, February 2002, 106, (1056), pp 57–113.Google Scholar
10. Green, J.E. Küchemann’s weight model as applied in the Greener by Design Technology Sub Group Report: a correction, adaptation and commentary, Aeronaut J, August 2006, 110, (1110), pp 511–516.Google Scholar
11. Poll, D.I.A. The optimum aeroplane and beyond, Aeronaut J, March 2009, 113, (1141), pp 151–164.Google Scholar
12. Flight Performance and Planning 2, Book 7 Skills for Flight Series, Transair (UK) 2005, ISBN 1-904935-06-0.Google Scholar
13. Nangia, R.K. Efficiency parameters for modern commercial aircraft, Aeronaut J, August 2006, 110, (1110), pp 495–510.Google Scholar
14. Creemers, W.L.H. and Slingerland, R. Impact of intermediate stops on long range jet transport design. AIAA-2007-7849, 7th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration and Operations Conference (ATIO), Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK, 18-20 September 2007.Google Scholar
15. Shevell, R.S. Fundamentals of Flight (2nd ed), Prentice Hall, 1989, ISBN 0-13-339060-8.Google Scholar
16. Dibley, H. Aircraft operational fuel savings and noise reduction-past and future, CEAS 2009, Manchester, UK, October 2009.Google Scholar