Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:17:49.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Emission prediction in conceptual design of the aircraft engines using augmented CRN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2017

Z. Saboohi*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Tehran, Iran
F. Ommi*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University (TMU), Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The semi-analytical prediction of pollutants emissions from gas turbines in the conceptual design phase is addressed in this paper. The necessity of this work arose from an urgent need for a comprehensive model that can quickly provide data in the conceptual design phase. Based on the available inputs data in the initial phases of the design process, a chemical reactor network (CRN) is defined to model the combustion with a detailed chemistry. In this way, three different chemical mechanisms are studied for Jet-A aviation fuel. Furthermore, the droplet evaporation for liquid fuel and the non-uniformity in fuel-air mixture are modelled. The results of a developed augmented modelling tool are compared with the pollutants data of two annular engine's combustors. The CRN results have good agreement with the actual engine test rig emissions output. In conclusion, the augmented CRN has shown to be efficient in predicting engine emissions with a very short executing time (few seconds) using a small CPU requirement such as a personal computer.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Korakianitis, T. and Wilson, D.G. Models for predicting the performance of Brayton-cycle engines, ASME 1992 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, 1992, pp V002T02A020-V002T02A020.Google Scholar
2. Wilson, D.G. and Korakianitis, T. The Design of High-Efficiency Turbomachinery and Gas Turbines, 2014, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, US.Google Scholar
3. Saravanamuttoo, H.I.H., Rogers, G.F.C. and Cohen, H. Gas Turbine Theory, 1996, T. J. Press, Padstow, Cornwall, UK.Google Scholar
4. Cumpsty, N. and Heyes, A. Jet Propulsion, 2015, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, US.Google Scholar
5. Leifsson, L., Mason, W., Schetz, J., Haftka, R. and Grossman, B. Multidisciplinary design optimization of low-airframe-noise transport aircraft, 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2006, p 230.Google Scholar
6. Antoine, N.E. and Kroo, I.M. Aircraft optimization for minimal environmental impact, J. Aircr., 2004, 41, pp 790-797.Google Scholar
7. Diedrich, A., Hileman, J., Tan, D., Willcox, K. and Spakovszky, Z. Multidisciplinary design and optimization of the silent aircraft, 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2006, p 1323.Google Scholar
8. Doulgeris, G., Korakianitis, T., Avital, E.J., Pilidis, P. and Laskaridis, P. Effect of jet noise reduction on gas turbine engine efficiency, Proceedings of the Institution of Mech. Engineers, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering, 2013, 227, pp 1441-1455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Turns, S.R. An Introduction to Combustion, 2nd ed, 2000, MacGraw Hill, Boston, Massachusetts, US.Google Scholar
10. Chen, J.-Y. Stochastic modelling of partially stirred reactors, Combustion Science and Technology, 1997, 122, pp 63-94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Bragg, S. Application of Reaction Rate Theory to Combustion Chamber Analysis, 1953.Google Scholar
12. Swithenbank, J., Poll, I., Vincent, M. and Wright, D. Combustion design fundamentals, Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1973, 14, pp 627-638.Google Scholar
13. Rubin, P. and Pratt, D. Zone Combustion Model Development and Use: Application to Emissions Control, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1991, pp 1-41.Google Scholar
14. Fichet, V., Kanniche, M., Plion, P. and Gicquel, O. A reactor network model for predicting NOx emissions in gas turbines, Fuel, 2010, 89, pp 2202-2210.Google Scholar
15. Cuoci, A., Frassoldati, A., Stagni, A., Faravelli, T., Ranzi, E. and Buzzi-Ferraris, G. Numerical modelling of NO x formation in turbulent flames using a kinetic post-processing technique, Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27, pp 1104-1122.Google Scholar
16. Moniruzzaman, C.G. and Yu, F. A 0D aircraft engine emission model with detailed chemistry and soot microphysics, Combustion and Flame, 2012, 159, pp 1670-1686.Google Scholar
17. Park, J., Nguyen, T.H., Joung, D., Huh, K.Y. and Lee, M.C. Prediction of NO x and CO emissions from an industrial lean-premixed gas turbine combustor using a chemical reactor network model, Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27, pp 1643-1651.Google Scholar
18. Stagni, A., Cuoci, A., Frassoldati, A., Faravelli, T. and Ranzi, E. A fully coupled, parallel approach for the post-processing of CFD data through reactor network analysis, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2014, 60, pp 197-212.Google Scholar
19. Rutar, T. and Malte, P.C. NOx formation in high-pressure jet-stirred reactors with significance to lean-premixed combustion turbines, ASME Turbo Expo 2001: Power for Land, Sea, and Air, 2001, pp V002T02A034–V002T02A034.Google Scholar
20. Rezvani, R., Denny, R. and Mavris, D. A design-oriented semi-analytical emissions prediction method for gas turbine combustors, 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 2009, p 704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Xu, K., Shen, S., Li, C. and Zheng, L. A new procedure for predicting NOx emission in preliminary gas turbine combustor design, ASME Turbo Expo 2013: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, 2013, pp V01BT04A018–V01BT04A018.Google Scholar
22. Saboohi, Z., Ommi, F. and Fakhrtabatabaei, A. Development of an augmented conceptual design tool for aircraft gas turbine combustors, Int J Multiphysics, 2016, 10.Google Scholar
23. Glassman, I. and Yetter, R. Combustion, 2008.Google Scholar
24. Lefebvre, A. Atomization and Sprays, vol 1040, 1988, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, US.Google Scholar
25. Lefebvre, A.H. Gas Turbine Combustion, 2010, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Radcliffe, A. Fuel Injection, High Speed Aerodynamics and Jet Propulsion, XID, Princeton University Press, 1960, New Jersey, Princeton.Google Scholar
27. Rink, K. and Lefebvre, A. Influence of Fuel Drop Size and Combustor Operating Conditions on Pollutant Emissions, 1986.Google Scholar
28. Council, C.R. Handbook of Aviation Fuel Properties, 2004, Society of Automotive Engineers, Pennsylvania, US.Google Scholar
29. Heywood, J.B. and Mikus, T. Parameters Controlling Nitric Oxide Emissions from Gas Turbine Combustors, 1973.Google Scholar
30. Smith, R. Advanced Low Emissions Subsonic Combustor Study, 1998.Google Scholar
31. Allaire, D.L. A Physics-Based Emissions Model for Aircraft Gas Turbine Combustors, 2006.Google Scholar
32. Mavris, D. Enhanced emission prediction modelling and analysis for conceptual design, 17 Final Report for NASA grant NNX07AO08A, 2010.Google Scholar
33. Marchand, M.D. Multi-Dimensional Carbon Monoxide Emissions Predictor for Preliminary Gas Turbine Combustor Design Optimization, 2013.Google Scholar
34. Fenimore, C. Formation of nitric oxide in premixed hydrocarbon flames, International Symposium on Combustion, 1971, 13, pp 373-380.Google Scholar
35. Mawid, M., Park, T., Sekar, B., Arana, C. and Aithal, S. Development of a detailed chemical kinetic mechanism for combustion of JP-7 fuel, Powered Flight- The Next Century, 2003.Google Scholar
36. Montgomery, C., Cannon, S., Mawid, M. and Sekar, B. Reduced chemical kinetic mechanisms for JP-8 combustion, 40th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, 2002, p 336.Google Scholar
37. Smith, G.P., Golden, D.M., Frenklach, M., Moriarty, N.W., Eiteneer, B., Goldenberg, M., Bowman, C.T., Hanson, R.K., Song, S. and Gardiner, W. GRI-Mech 3.0, 1999, URL http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri_mech, 2011.Google Scholar
38. Maurice, L., Blust, J., Leung, K. and Lindstedt, R. Emissions from combustion of hydrocarbons in a well-stirred reactor, 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 1999, p 1038.Google Scholar
39. Lindstedt, R. and Maurice, L. Detailed chemical-kinetic model for aviation fuels, J Propulsion and Power, 2000, 16, pp 187-195.Google Scholar
40. Ranzi, E., Frassoldati, A., Grana, R., Cuoci, A., Faravelli, T., Kelley, A. and Law, C. Hierarchical and comparative kinetic modelling of laminar flame speeds of hydrocarbon and oxygenated fuels, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2012, 38, pp 468-501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. Faravelli, T., Frassoldati, A. and Ranzi, E. Kinetic modelling of the interactions between NO and hydrocarbons in the oxidation of hydrocarbons at low temperatures, Combustion and Flame, 2003, 132, pp 188-207.Google Scholar
42. Berta, P., Aggarwal, S.K., Puri, I.K., Granata, S., Faravelli, T. and Ranzi, E. Experimental and numerical investigation of n-heptane/air counterflow nonpremixed flame structure, J Propulsion and Power, 2008, 24, pp 797-804.Google Scholar
43. Cuoci, A., Frassoldati, A., Faravelli, T. and Ranzi, E. Formation of soot and nitrogen oxides in unsteady counterflow diffusion flames, Combustion and Flame, 2009, 156, pp 2010-2022.Google Scholar
44. Mattingly, J.D. Aircraft Engine Design, 2002.Google Scholar
45. Burrus, D., Sabla, P. and Bahr, D. Energy Efficient Engine, 1980.Google Scholar
46. Dodds, W. Engine and aircraft technologies to reduce emissions, 1 ICCAIA Noise and Emissions Committee, 2002, San Diego, California, US.Google Scholar
47. Burrus, D., Chahrour, C., Foltz, H., Sabla, P., Seto, S. and Taylor, J. Energy Efficient Engine (E3) combustion system component technology performance report, 1984.Google Scholar
48. Gordon, S. and McBride, B.J. Computer program for calculation of complex chemical equilibrium compositions and applications. Part 1: Analysis, 1994.Google Scholar