Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:31:34.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conjugate heat transfer modeling of a turbine vane endwall with thermal barrier coatings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2019

Xing Yang
Affiliation:
Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityShaanxi Engineering Laboratory of Turbomachinery and Power Equipment Institute of Turbomachinery, School of Energy and Power Engineering Xi’an, Shaanxi China
Zhenping Feng
Affiliation:
Xi’an Jiaotong UniversityShaanxi Engineering Laboratory of Turbomachinery and Power Equipment Institute of Turbomachinery, School of Energy and Power Engineering Xi’an, Shaanxi China
Terrence W. Simon
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota Department of Mechanical Engineering Minneapolis, MN USA

Abstract

Advanced cooling techniques involving internal enhanced heat transfer and external film cooling and thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) are employed for gas turbine hot components to reduce metal temperatures and to extend their lifetime. A deeper understanding of the interaction mechanism of these thermal protection methods and the conjugate thermal behaviours of the turbine parts provides valuable guideline for the design stage. In this study, a conjugate heat transfer model of a turbine vane endwall with internal impingement and external film cooling is constructed to document the effects of TBCs on the overall cooling effectiveness using numerical simulations. Experiments on the same model with no TBCs are performed to validate the computational methods. Round and crater holes due to the inclusion of TBCs are investigated as well to address how film-cooling configurations affect the aero-thermal performance of the endwall. Results show that the TBCs have a profound effect in reducing the endwall metal temperatures for both cases. The TBC thermal protection for the endwall is shown to be more significant than the effect of increasing coolant mass flow rate. Although the crater holes have better film cooling performance than the traditional round holes, a slight decrement of overall cooling effectiveness is found for the crater configuration due to more endwall metal surfaces directly exposed to external mainstream flows. Energy loss coefficients at the vane passage exit show a relevant negative impact of adding TBCs on the cascade aerodynamic performance, particularly for the round hole case.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Royal Aeronautical Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Padture, N.P., Gell, M., and Jordan, E.H. Thermal barrier coatings for gas-turbine engine applications, Science, 2002, 296, (5566), pp 280284.Google ScholarPubMed
Hylton, L.D., Mihelc, M.S., Turner, E.R., Nealy, D.A., and York, R.E. Analytical and experimental evaluation of the heat transfer distribution over the surfaces of turbine vanes, NASA Lewis Research Centre, Cleveland, OH, Report No. NASA-CR-168015, 1983.Google Scholar
Hylton, L.D., Nirmalan, V., Sultanian, B.K., and Kauffman, R.M. The effects of leading edge and downstream film cooling on turbine vane heat transfer, NASA, Washington, DC, Report No. NASA-CR-182133, 1988.Google Scholar
Turner, E.R., Wilson, M.D., Hylton, L.D., and Kauffman, R.M. Turbine vane external heat transfer. Volume 1: analytical and experimental evaluation of surface heat transfer distributions with leading edge showerhead film cooling, NASA Lewis Research Centre, Cleveland, OH, Report No. NASA-CR-174827, 1985.Google Scholar
Albert, J.E., Bogard, D.G., and Cunha, F. Adiabatic and overall effectiveness for a film cooled blade, ASME Paper No. GT2004-53998, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, T.W. and Piggush, J.D. Turbine endwall aerodynamics and heat transfer, AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2006, 22, (2), pp 301312.Google Scholar
Wright, L.M., Malak, M.F., Crites, D.C., Morris, M.C., and Bilwani, R. Review of platform cooling technology for high pressure turbine blades, ASME Paper GT2014-26373, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mensch, A. and Thole, K.A. Overall effectiveness of a blade endwall with jet impingement and film cooling, ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2014, 136, (3), p 031901.Google Scholar
Li, X.Y., Ren, J., and Jiang, H.D. Experimental investigation of endwall heat transfer with film and impingement cooling, ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2017, 139, (10), p 101901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Na, S., Williams, B., Dennis, R.A., Bryden, K.M., and Shih, T.I.-P. Internal and film cooling of a flat plate with conjugate heat transfer, ASME Paper GT2007-27599, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maikell, J., Bogard, D.G., Piggush, J., and Kohli, A. Experimental simulation of a film cooled turbine blade leading edge including thermal barrier coating effects, ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2011, 133, (1), p 011014.Google Scholar
Davidson, F.T., Dees, J.E., and Bogard, D.G. An experimental study of thermal barrier coatings and film cooling on an internally cooled simulated turbine vane, ASME Paper GT2011-46604, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, F.T., Kistenmacher, D.A., and Bogard, D.G. Film cooling with a thermal barrier coating: round holes, craters, and trenches, ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2014, 136, (4), p 041007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kistenmacher, D.A., Davidson, F.T., and Bogard, D.G. Realistic trench film cooling with a thermal barrier coating and deposition, ASME Paper GT2013-95921, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mensch, A., Thole, K.A., and Craven, B.A. Conjugate heat transfer measurements and predictions of a blade endwall with a thermal barrier coating, ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2014, 136, (12), p 121003.Google Scholar
Yang, X., Liu, Z.S., Zhao, Q., Liu, Z., and Feng, Z.P. Experimental investigations and numerical analysis on heat transfer of a NGV endwall at engine representative Reynolds and Mach numbers, Proceedings of Shanghai 2017 Global Power and Propulsion Forum, GPPS-2017-0128, Shanghai, 2017.Google Scholar
Yang, X., Liu, Z.S., Zhao, Q., Liu, Z., Feng, Z.P., Guo, F.S., Ding, L., and Simon, T.W.Experimental and numerical investigations of overall cooling effectiveness on a vane endwall with jet impingement and film cooling,Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 148, pp 11481163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffat, R.J. Describing the Uncertainties in Experimental Results, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 1988, 1, (1), pp 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Y., Dhungel, A., Ekkad, S.V., and Bunker, R.S. Effect of trench width and depth on film cooling from cylindrical holes embedded in trenches, ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2009, 131, (1), p 011003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundaram, N. and Thole, K.A. Bump and trench modifications to film-cooling holes at the vane endwall junction, ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2008, 130, (4), p 041013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kistenmacher, D.A. Experimental investigation of film cooling and thermal barrier coatings on a gas turbine vane with conjugate heat transfer effects, Master Thesis, the University of Texas at Austin, USA, 2013.Google Scholar
Kost, F. and Nicklas, M. Film-cooled turbine endwall in a transonic flow field: part i-aerodynamic measurements, ASME Paper 2001-GT-0145, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barigozzi, G., Abdeh, H., Perdichizzi, A., Henze, M., and Krueckels, J. Aero-thermal performance of a nozzle vane cascade with a generic non uniform inlet flow condition - part ii: influence of purge and film cooling injection, ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2017, 139, (10), p 101004.Google Scholar
Sundaram, N., and Thole, K.A. Effects of surface deposition, hole blockage, and thermal barrier coating spallation on vane endwall film cooling, ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 2007, 129, (3), pp 599607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar