Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:53:02.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conceptual model for runway change procedure in Guarulhos International Airport based on SODAR data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2016

W. Luiz Silva*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Applied Meteorology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
F.L. Albuquerque Neto
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Applied Meteorology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
G.B. França
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Applied Meteorology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
M.R. Matschinske
Affiliation:
Brazilian Organization for Scientific and Technological, Development of the Airspace Control, Implementation Commission of the Airspace Control System, Brazil

Abstract

In this work, we qualify and quantify the advantages of using SODAR (sonic detection and ranging) from current scenarios of Aeronautical Meteorology, with the goal of establishing a conceptual model for runway change procedures at Guarulhos International Airport (São Paulo, Brazil). The methods consist of analysing data from the Department of Airspace Control (DECEA) and Brazilian Airport Infrastructure (Infraero) about the reports of runway changes in Guarulhos in addition to SODAR data from September 2011 and December 2013. It is noted that in 234 analysed cases of runway change, there were significant periods of weak-intensity wind on the surface as well as the anticipated modification wind direction at altitude detected by sonic detection and ranging (SODAR), indicating future changes in levels closer to the surface. By examining the intersection of both scenarios, it is possible to observe that there is enough time for the air traffic controller to anticipate the needed runway change while minimising the impact on the aircraft flow, and this period has an average duration of 1 hour and 24 minutes. This confirms that the preliminary analysis of the information provided by SODAR can help predict alterations in wind direction, requiring redirection and bringing advantages in economic and security terms.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ahrens, C.D. Meteorology Today: Introduction to Weather Climate and Environment, 9th ed, 2008, Brooks/Cole, Belmont, California, US.Google Scholar
2. Wallace, J.M. and Hobbs, P.V. Atmospheric Science: An Introductory Survey, 2nd ed, 2006, Academic Press, Burlington, Massachusetts, US.Google Scholar
3. SODAR Manual. Scintec Flat Array Sodars: Software Manual APRun, Version 1.22, 2010, Scintec AG, Rottenburg, Germany.Google Scholar
4. Gerz, T., Holzäpfel, F., Gerling, W., Scharnweber, A., Frech, M., Kober, K., Dengler, K. and Rahm, S. The wake vortex prediction and monitoring system WSVBS part II: Performance and ATC integration at Frankfurt Airport, Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 2009, 17, (4), pp 323346.Google Scholar
5. ICAO – International Civil Aviation Organization. Air Traffic Management: Procedures for Air Navigation Services, Doc 4444, ATM/501, 15th ed, 2007, p 180.Google Scholar
6. NREL – National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Comparison of Triton SODAR data to meteorological tower wind measurement data in Hebei Province, China, NREL/TP-5000-52709, 38, 2012.Google Scholar
7. Chan, P.W. Performance and aviation applications of minisodars at Hong Kong International Airport, Meteorological Applications, 2014, 21, pp 6273.Google Scholar
8. DECEA – Department of Airspace Control. ROTAER – Publicação Auxiliar de Rotas Aéreas, Comando da Aeronáutica, 5th ed, 2014, DECEA, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, p 778.Google Scholar
9. DECEA – Department of Airspace Control. ICA – Instrução do Comando da Aeronáutica 100-12/Regras do Ar, Ministério da Defesa, 2013, DECEA, Brasília, Brazil, p 81.Google Scholar