Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:20:38.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Composite control system of hybrid-driven mid-altitude airship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2017

L. Chen ,
Q. Dong ,
G. Zhang  and
D. Duan
L. Chen*
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, P.R China
Q. Dong
Affiliation:
Functional Teaching and Research Section, Mudanjiang Medical University, Mudanjiang, P.R China
G. Zhang
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, P.R China
D. Duan
Affiliation:
School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, P.R China
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In general, an airship is equipped with hybrid-heterogeneous actuators: the aerodynamic surfaces, the vectored propellers and the buoyant ballonets. The aerodynamic surfaces have high efficiency in attitude control at high speed. However, vectored propellers are also introduced here for attitude control under the special working condition of low airspeed. Due to the lower thrust-to-weight ratio, the composite control of hybrid-heterogeneous actuators is the primary object in controller design for an airship. In composite attitude control, first the attitude moment allocation between aerodynamic control surfaces and vectored propellers is designed according to different dynamic airspeed, to achieve the smooth motion transition from low to high airspeed, then the weighted generalised inverse (WGI) is used to design the reconfigurable actuator allocation among the homogeneous multi-actuators, where the authority of every actuator can be decided by setting the corresponding value of the weight matrix, thus the control law is unchanged under different actuator configurations. Taking the mid-altitude airship as an example, the simulations of position control, trace tracking and altitude control are provided. Simulation results demonstrate that the attitude moments allocation obtains moment distribution between the aerodynamic surfaces and the vectored propellers under different airspeeds; the reconfigurable actuator allocation achieves a good distribution and reconfiguration among homogeneous actuators, thereby enhancing the reliability of the control system.

Keywords

Hybrid-driven mid-altitude airshipcomposite controlattitude moment allocationreconfigurable actuator allocation
Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 122 , Issue 1248 , February 2018 , pp. 173 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Takashi, K., Nakadate, M. and Okuyama, M. On-going UAV R&D at JAXA's aviation program group- second report with emphasis on LTA flight control, 18th AIAA Lighter-Than-Air Systems Technology Conference, 4-7 May 2009, Seattle, Washington, US.Google Scholar
2. Azinheira, J.R., Moutinho, A. and Carvalho, J.R. Lateral control of airship with uncertain dynamics using incremental nonlinear dynamics inversion, IFAC-Papers On Line, 2015, 48 (19), pp 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Yang, Y. and An, Y. Neural network approximation-based nonsingular terminal sliding mode control for trajectory tracking of robotic airships, Aerospace Science and Technology, 2016, 54, pp 192–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Zheng, Z.W., Chen, T, Xu, M. and Zhu, M. Modelling and path-following control of a vector-driven stratospheric satellite, Advances in Space Research, 2016, 57 (9), pp 1901–1913.Google Scholar
5. Liu, Y., Wu, Y.L. and Hu, Y.M. Autonomous dynamics-modeling and feedback control for an airship, Control Theory and Applications, 2010, 27 (8), pp 991–997.Google Scholar
6. Fan, Y.H., Yu, Y.F. and Yan, J. High altitude airship altitude control system design and simulation, Science Technology and Engineering, 2011, 11 (24), pp 5957–5961.Google Scholar
7. Guo, J.G. and Zhou, J. Compound control system of stratospheric airship based on aircrew systems, J Astronautics, 2009, 30 (1), pp 225–230.Google Scholar
8. Di, X.G., Han, F. and Yao, Y. Attitude control allocation strategy of high altitude airship based on synthetic performance optimization, J Harbin Institute of Technology, 2009, 16 (6), pp 746–750.Google Scholar
9. Chen, L., Zhou, G., Yan, X. J. and Duan, D. P. Composite control strategy of stratospheric airships with moving masses, J Aircr, 2012, 49 (3), pp 794–800.Google Scholar
10. Liesk, T., Nahon, M. and Boulet, B. Design and experimental validation of a nonlinear low-level controller for an unmanned fin-less airship, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2013, 21 (1), pp 149–161.Google Scholar
11. Battipede, M., Gili, P. and Lando, M. Ground station and flight simulator for a remotely-piloted non-conventional airship. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2005, California, San Francisco, US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Rooz, N. and Johnson, E.N. Design and modeling of an airship station holding controller for low cost satellite operations, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2005, San Francisco, California, US.Google Scholar
13. Berge, S. P. and Fossen, T. I. Robust Control allocation of overactuated ships: experiments with a model ship, Proceedings of the 4th IFAC, Conference on Maneuvering and Control of Marine Craft, 1997, Brijuni, Croatia, pp 166-171.Google Scholar
14. Johansen, T. A., Fossen, T. I. and Berge, S. P. Constraint nonlinear control allocation with singularity avoidance using sequential quadratic programming, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, TCST-12, 2004, pp 211-216.Google Scholar
15. Durham, W. C. Constrained control allocation, J Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 1993, 16 (4), pp 717–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Bordignon, K.A. Constrained control allocation for systems with redundant control effectors, PhD thesis, 1996, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, US.Google Scholar
17. Buffington, J. M. and Enns, D. F. Lyapunov stability analysis of daisy chain control allocation, J Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1996, 19 (6), pp 1226–1230.Google Scholar
18. Enns, D. Control allocation approaches, Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 1998, Reston, Virginia, US, pp 98-108.Google Scholar
19. Lane, S.H. and Stengel, R.F. Flight control design using non-linear inverse dynamics, Automatica, 1988, 24 (4), pp 471–483.Google Scholar
20. Enns, D., Bugajski, D., Hendrick, R. and Stein, G. Dynamic inversion: an evolving methodology for flight control design, Int J Control, 1994, 59 (1), pp 71–91.Google Scholar
21. Ikeda, Y. and Hood, M. An application of L1 optimization to control allocation, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, August 2000, Denver, Colorado, US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Bodson, M. Evaluation of optimization methods for control allocation. J Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2002, 25, pp 703–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Reiman, S.E. and Dillon, C.H. Robust adaptive reconfigurable control for a hypersonic cruise vehicle, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 10-13 August 2009, Chicago, Illinois, AIAA 2009-6185.Google Scholar
24. Davidson, J.B., Lallman, F.J. and Bundick, W.T. Integrated reconfigurable control allocation, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2001, Montreal, Canada, AIAA 2001-4083.Google Scholar
25. Wang, X.L., Fu, G.Y., Duan, D.P. and Shan, X.X. Experimental Investigations on aerodynamic characteristics of the ZHIYUAN-1 Airship, J Aircr, 2010, 47 (4), pp 1463–1469.Google Scholar
26. Zhang, M.H, Duan, D.P. and Chen, L. Turning mechanism and composite control of stratospheric airships, J Zhejiang University, Science C, 2012, 13 (11), pp 859–865.Google Scholar
27. Chen, L. and Duan, D. Attitude control of stratospheric airship with ballonets and elevator, Proceedings of the 32nd Chinese Control Conference, 26-28 July 2013, Xi'an, China, pp 4255-4258.Google Scholar