Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:07:02.001Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cautionary Note Regarding Some Chemicals used for Transition Indication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

Summary

This note draws attention to the poisonous properties of certain chemicals which have previously been used for transition indication in wind tunnels, indicates which alternatives are safe, and suggests general precautions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Relf, E. F.. Recent Aerodynamic Developments. J.R.Ae.S. 50, 424 (1946).Google Scholar
2. Richards, E. J and Burstall, F. H.. The“China-Clay” Method of Indicating Transition. R. & M. 2126 (1945).Google Scholar
3. Relf, E. F.. Nitrobenzene Dangers. J.R.Ae.S. 51, 69 (1947).Google Scholar
4. Merewether, E. R. A. and others. A note on the Toxic Effects of Some Chemicals previously recommended for use in Wind Tunnel Technique, and on Vapour and Gas Explosion Risks in Wind Tunnels. R. & M. 2198 (1946).Google Scholar
5. Preston, J. H. and Sweeting, N. E.. Experiments on the Measurement of Transition Position by Chemical Methods. R. & M. 2014 (1945).Google Scholar
6. Pankhurst, R. C. and others. Tests of Contra-Rotating Propellers of 2½ ft. Diameter at Positive Pitch on a Typhoon Aircraft Model. R. & M. 2217 (1945).Google Scholar