Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:17:27.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A cartesian cut cell method for compressible flows Part B: moving body problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

G. Yang ,
D. M. Causon ,
D. M. Ingram ,
R. Saunders  and
P. Battent
G. Yang
Affiliation:
Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Flow Analysis Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester, UK
D. M. Causon
Affiliation:
Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Flow Analysis Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester, UK
D. M. Ingram
Affiliation:
Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Flow Analysis Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester, UK
R. Saunders
Affiliation:
Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Flow Analysis Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester, UK
P. Battent
Affiliation:
Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Flow Analysis Manchester Metropolitan University Manchester, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A cartesian cut cell method for static body problems was presented in Part A (pp 47-56). Here, we extend the method to unsteady compressible flows involving arbitrarily moving bodies. The moving bodies are allowed to cross a stationary background cartesian mesh. So problems such as mesh distortion and/or restrictions on body motion which may affect other mesh approaches do not occur.

A MUSCL-Hancock finite volume scheme has been modified for moving boundary problems. The upwind fluxes on the interfaces of static cells are updated using an HLLC approximate Riemann solver and an exact Riemann solution for a moving piston is used to update moving solid boundaries (faces). A cell merging technique has been developed to maintain numerical stability in the presence of arbitrarily small cut cells and to retain strict conservation at moving boundaries.

The method has been validated against some well-known two dimensional test problems and applied to practical examples involving an exploding pressure vessel and a store release into a Mach 1.5 stream.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 101 , Issue 1002 , February 1997 , pp. 57 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Now at the Department of Engineering. UM1ST

References

1. Causon, D.M., Clench, T.L. and Ingram, D.M. The use of CFD techniques to investigate the physical nature of engine surge and its effect on a twin engine intake duct system, In: Proc of RAeS Engine- Airframe Integration conference, 1992.Google Scholar
2. Lohner, R. Adaptive remeshing for transient problems, Comp Methods in Appl Mech Eng, 1989, 75, pp 195–214.Google Scholar
3. Gaitonde, A.L. and Fiddes, S.P. A three-dimensional moving mesh method for the calculation of unsteady transonic flows. In: Proc 1993 European Forum — Recent Developments and Applications in Aeronautical CFD, RAeS, pp 13.1-13.12.Google Scholar
4. Steger, J.L., Dougherty, F.C. and Benek, J.A. A Chimera Grid Scheme, In: Advances in Grid Generation, ASME FED-5, 1983, pp 59–69.Google Scholar
5. Blaylock, T.A. and Onslow, S.H. Application of the FAME method to store release prediction, In: Computational Fluid Dynamics ‘94, Stuttgart, Germany, 1994.Google Scholar
6. Toro, E.F., Spruce, M. and Speares, W. Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL Riemann solver, Shock Waves, 1994, 4, pp 25–34.Google Scholar
7. Chiang, Y., van Leer, B. and Powell, K.G. Simulation of unsteady inviscid flow on an adaptively refined cartesian grid, AIAA Paper 92-0443, 1992.Google Scholar
8. Clarke, D.K., Salas, M.D. and Hassan, H.A. Euler calculations for multielement airfoils using cartesian grids, AIAA J, 1986, 24, (3).Google Scholar
9. Coirier, W.J. and Powell, K.G. An accuracy assessment of cartesian mesh approaches for die Euler equations, AIAA Paper 93-3335-CP, 1993.Google Scholar
10. Woodard, P. and Colella, P. The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks, J Comput Phys, 1984, 54, pp 115–173.Google Scholar
11. Baum, M.R. Pressure vessel rupture within a chamber: the pressure history on the chamber wall, Experimental Ther al and Fluid Science, 1991, 4, pp 265–272.Google Scholar
12. Prodert, E.J., Hassan, O., Morgan, K. and Peraire, J. An adaptive finite element method for transient compressible flows with moving boundaries, lnt J Numer Meth Eng, 1991, 32, (4) pp 751–765.Google Scholar
13. Trepanier, J.Y., Reggio, M., Paraschivoiu, M. and Camarero, R. Unsteady Euler solutions for arbitrarily moving bodies and boundaries, AIAA J, 1993, 31, (10), pp 1869–1876.Google Scholar