Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:09:15.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aerodynamics of delta wings with flaps at hypersonic speeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2016

R. Ramesh
R. Ramesh*
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of ScienceBangalore, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Control surface effectiveness is an important parameter for any aeroplane. For a hypersonic aircraft, though the power required to operate the flaps is determined by low speed flying conditions, it is imperative to know the effect of flaps at hypersonic speeds. Hence, studies have been done on this topic by aerodynamicists for over 40 years. In spite of this, only a limited data is available in the literature on this subject.

This paper discusses the experimental study of the effect of sweep on the aerodynamic characteristics of thin slab delta wings with flaps at hypersonic speeds. For the purpose of this investigation, a novel special thin six-component balance, which has a thickness of 4mm and can be housed inside wings with 8mm thickness, has been designed. The wings had a sweep of 76°, 70° and 65°, t/c of 0.053 and flaps with 12% of wing area and 12% of wing chord. Testing were done at Mach 8.2, Re number of 2.13 x 106 (based on chord), from α = –12° to 12° and flap angle of 20°, 30° and 40°. Separation lengths, measured from Schlieren pictures, clearly show that there is ‘no appreciable’ effect of sweep on them. Also, using a simple local flow field calculation, the separation has been identified to be transitional in nature. These features of separation reflect in the force data. Because of the small separation length, the flaps (inspite of their small size) were very effective in generating additional CN, CM and Cl, which increased with increase in flap angle. In general, the CN, CM and XCP were unaffected by sweep for symmetric flap deflection at positive incidences and asymmetric flap case. For symmetric flap case at negative incidences, only CN was not influenced by the sweep but CM decreased and XCP moved upstream as the sweep is decreased. The wing with lower sweep produces higher CA and lower (L/D)max for both symmetric and asymmetric flaps. The rolling moment and adverse yaw increased with decrease in sweep for asymmetric flap deflection. Newtonian theory is shown to be incapable of predicting the effect of sweep on Cl, Cn and on the incremental values of CN, CM and CA.

In conclusion, it can be said that a small flap is generally adequate for hypersonic aeroplanes provided they operate at altitudes where transitional and turbulent separation can be expected to occur. This would make the flaps effective and thus enable ample control authority.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 106 , Issue 1060 , June 2002 , pp. 293 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ramesh, R., Ramaswamy, M.A., Vasudevan, B. and Prabhu, A. On the aerodynamic characteristics of thin slab delta wings at hypersonic speeds — part I: Interference of lee-side bodies, Aeronaut J, November 2000, pp 561–567.Google Scholar
2. Ramesh, R., Vasudevan, B., Ramaswamy, M.A. and Prabhu, A. On the aerodynamic characteristics of thin slab delta wings at hypersonic speeds — part II: Effect of wing geometry, Aeronaut J, December 2000, pp 597–614.Google Scholar
3. Perrier, P. Aerodynamic and aerothermal challenges for the design of the Hermes space plane, in theoretical and experimental methods in hypersonic flows, AGARD-CP-514, 1993.Google Scholar
4. Neuman, R.D. Missions and requirements in Aerothermodynamics of hypersonh-vehicles, AGARD-Report 761, 1989.Google Scholar
5. Rogers, E.W.E. A note on the aerodynamic problems of hypersonic controls, NPL Aero Memo 58 or ARC 30648, 1968.Google Scholar
6. Gottmann, T. and Cucinelli, G. Experimental results in aerodynamic stability and control of a TSTO configuration in Theoretical and experimental methods in hypersonic flows, AGARD-CP-514, 1993.Google Scholar
7. Meckler, L. Effect of separation on the characteristics of aerodynamic controls on a representative hypersonic configuration at Mach 8, Grumman Res Dept Report RE-312, 1967.Google Scholar
8. Kaufman, L.G., Meckler, L and Hartofilis, S.A. An investigation of flow separation and aerodynamic controls at hypersonic speeds, J Aircr, 1966, 3, pp 555–561.Google Scholar
9. Rao, D.M. Hypersonic Control Effectiveness Studies On Delta Wings With Trailing Edge Flaps, 1970, PhD Thesis, London University.Google Scholar
10. Small, W.J., Kirkham, F.S. and Fetterman, D.E. Aerodynamic characteristics of hypersonic transport configuration at Mach 6.86, NASA TND-5885, 1970.Google Scholar
11. Dillon, J.L. and Pittman, J.L. Aerodynamic characteristics of Mach 6 of a wing-body concept for a hypersonic research airplane, NASA TP 1249, 1978.Google Scholar
12. Ellison, J.C. Investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of a hypersonic transport model at Mach numbers to 6, NASA TN D-6191, 1971.Google Scholar
13. Fetterman, D.E. and Neal, L. Jr. An analysis of the delta wing hypersonic stability and control behaviour at angles-of-attack between 30° and 90°, NASA TN D-1602, 1963.Google Scholar
14. Ramesh, R. Aerodynamic Characteristics Of Thin Slab Delta Wings At Hypersonic Speeds — Effect Of Wing Geometry And Flaps, 1999, PhD Thesis, Dept of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Science.Google Scholar
15. Ramesh, R., Ramaswamy, M.A. and Vasudevan, B. Thin flat internal strain guage balance for testing slab delta wing models at hypersonic speeds, IEEE-ICIASF-1995, pp 18.1–18.6.Google Scholar
16. Ramesh, R. Thin flat balances for testing thin delta wings at hypersonic speeds, Measurement Science and Technology, September 2001, pp 1555–1567.Google Scholar
17. Kline, S.J. and McClintock, F.A. Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiments, Mechanical Engineering, January 1953, pp 3–8.Google Scholar
18. Simeonides, G. Hypersonic shock wave boundary-layer interactions over simplified deflected control surface configurations, AGARD-R 792, 1994.Google Scholar
19. Gadd, G.E., Holder, D.W. and Regan, J.D. An experimental investigation of the interaction between shock waves and boundary-layers, Proc Roy Soc, Series A, 1954, 226, pp 227–253.Google Scholar
20. Edwards, A.J. Heat transfer distribution on a 70° delta wing with flap induced separation, IC Aero-75-01, 1975.Google Scholar
21. Becker, J.V. and Korycinsky, P.F. Heat transfer and pressure distribution at a Mach number of 6-8 on bodies with conical flares and extensive flow separation,NASA TN D-1260, 1962.Google Scholar
22. Holden, M.S. Boundary-layer displacement and leading-edge bluntness effects on attached and separated laminar boundary layers in a compression corner. Part II: Experimental study, AIAA J, 1971, 9, pp 84–93.Google Scholar
23. Anderson, J.D. Jr. Hypersonic and High Temperature Gas Dynamics, 1989, McGraw Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
24. Edney, B. Anomolous heat transfer and pressure distributions on blunt bodies at hypersonic speeds in the presence of an impinging shock, FFA Report 115, Aero Res Inst of Sweden, 1968.Google Scholar
25. Giles, H.L. and Thomas, J.W. Analysis of hypersonic pressure and heat transfer tests on a flat plate with flap and a delta wing with body, elevons, fins and rudder, NASA CR-536, 1966.Google Scholar
26. Reding, J.P. and Ericsson, L.E. Effects of delta wing separation on shuttle dynamics, J Spacecr and Rockets, 1973, 10, pp 421–428.Google Scholar
27. Whitehead, A.H. and Keyes, J.W. Flow phenomena and separation over delta wings with trailing edge flaps at Mach 6, AIAA J, 1968, 6, pp 2380–2387.Google Scholar
28. Keyes, J.W. Pressure and heat transfer on a 75° swept delta wing with trailing edge flap at Mach 6 and angles-of-attack to 90°, NASA TN D-5418, 1969.Google Scholar
29. Keyes, J.W. and Ashby, C.G. Calculated and experimental hinge moments on a trailing edge flap of a 75° swept delta wing at Mach 6, NASA TN D-4268, 1967.Google Scholar
30. Stern, I. and Rowe, W.H. Effect of gap size on pressure and heating over the flap of a blunt delta wing in hypersonic flow, J Spacecr and Rockets, 1967, 4, pp 109–114.Google Scholar
31. Babinsky, H. and Stollery, J.L. Flow over a delta wing at hypersonic speed, 1991, 1st European Symposium on Hypersonic Flow, ESTEC.Google Scholar
32.AMARJIT SINGH Flow over a delta wing and blunt body combination at hypersonic speeds, 1994, ICAS-94-10.1.3, pp 356–361.Google Scholar
33. Clark, E.L. and Trimmer, L.L. Equations and charts for the evaluation of the hypersonic aerodynamic characteristics of lifting configurations by Newtonian theory, AEDC-TDR-64-25, 1964.Google Scholar