Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T11:14:36.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

X-Ray Residual Stress Mapping in Industrial Materials By Energy Dispersive Diffractometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

C. J. Bechtoldt
Affiliation:
National Bureau of Standards Washington, D.C. 20234
R. C. Placious
Affiliation:
National Bureau of Standards Washington, D.C. 20234
W. J. Boettinger
Affiliation:
National Bureau of Standards Washington, D.C. 20234
M. Kuriyama
Affiliation:
National Bureau of Standards Washington, D.C. 20234
Get access

Abstract

An application of energy dispersive diffractometry to the measurement of residual strains (stresses) in the interior of industrial materials is described with particular emphasis on the use of high energy (up to 250 keV) x-ray photons. The use of high energy photons permits better penetration into materials. Hence diffraction data for evaluating bulk residual strains can be obtained in the transmission geometry in contrast with the conventional angular dispersive diffractometry, which uses Bragg reflections from the surface of materials. The reliability and sensitivity (detectability of small strains) of the energy dispersive method are demonstrated through its application to mapping of residual stress distributions across weld zones in Alaskan pipe line segments (API5LX65). The detectability of strain variations within materials depends on x-ray optical resolution and statistics.

Type
VIII. XRD Applications
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cohen, J. B., H. Dölle and James, M. E., Proceedings of Symposium on Accuracy in Powder Diffraction in : “NBS Special Publ. 567,” p. 453 (1980).Google Scholar
2. Giessen, B. C. and Gordon, G.E., Science 159 973 (1968).Google Scholar
3. Leonard, L., “Franklin Institute Research Lab Report F-C3454,” Philadelphia, July (1973).Google Scholar
4. Kuriyama, M., Boettinger, W.J. and Burdette, H.E., ASNT National Fall Conference, p. 49 (1978), October, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
5. Kuriyama, M., Boettinger, W.J. and Burdette, H.E., Proceedings of Symposium on Accuracy in Powder Diffraction, “NBS Special Publ. 567,” p. 479 (1980).Google Scholar
6. Kuriyama, M., Proc. of Synposium on Nondestructive Measure of Wheel/Axle Residual Stress, Dept. of Transportation, (1981). In print.Google Scholar
7. Laine, E., Lahteenmaki, I. and Kantola, M., X-Ray Spectrometry, 193 (1972).Google Scholar
8. Kukamachi, T., Rosoya, S. and Terasaki, D., J. Appl. Cryst. 6 117 (1973).Google Scholar