Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T04:11:32.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improvement of the Detection Sensitivity of Edxrf Trace Element Analysis by Means of Efficient X-Ray Focusing Based on Strongly Curved Hopg Crystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Burkhard Beckhoff
Affiliation:
University of Bremen, Department of Physics, P.O. 330 440, D-28334 Bremen, Germany
Birgit Kanngießer
Affiliation:
University of Bremen, Department of Physics, P.O. 330 440, D-28334 Bremen, Germany
Get access

Abstract

X-ray focusing based on Bragg reflection at curved crystals allows collection of a large solid angle of incident radiation, monochromatization of this radiation, and condensation of the beam reflected at the crystal into a small spatial cross-section in a pre-selected focal plane. Thus, for the Bragg reflected radiation, one can achieve higher intensities than for the radiation passing directly to the same small area in the focal plane. In that case one can profit considerably from X-ray focusing in an EDXRF arrangement. The 00 2 reflection at Highly Oriented Pyrolytic Graphite (HOPG) crystals offers a very high intensity of the Bragg reflected beam for a wide range of photon energies. Furthermore, curvature radii smaller than 10 mm can be achieved for HOPG crystals ensuring efficient X-ray focusing in EDXRF applications. For the trace analysis of very small amounts of specimen material deposited on small areas of thin-filter backings, HOPG based X-ray focusing may be used to achieve a very high intensity of monochromatic excitation radiation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Antonov, A. A., Baryshev, V. B., Grigoryeva, I. G., Kulipanov, G. N., Terekhov, Ya. V., and Shipkov, N. N., Rev. Sri. Iustrum., Vol. 60, No. 7 (1989), 24622463.Google Scholar
2. Antonov, A. A., Baryshev, V. B., Grigoryeva, I. G., Kulipanov, G. N., and Shipkov, N. N., Nucl. Instr. Meth. In Physics Research, Vol. A308 (1991), 442446 Google Scholar
3. Beckhoff, B., and Laursen, J., X-Ray Spectrom., Vol. 23 (1994), 718.Google Scholar
4. Beckhoff, B., KanngieBer, B., Scheer, J., Swoboda, W., and Laursen, J., Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 37 (1994), 523533.Google Scholar
5. Bohgard, M., Mahnqvist, K. G., Johansson, G. I., Akselsson, K. R., Aerosols in the Mining and Industrial Work Environment, 3. Ann Arbor Publishers, (1982), 907917.Google Scholar
6. Dolezal, E., Goetz, A., Woestheinrich, C., Beckhoff, B., J. Aerosol Sci., Vol. 24 (1993), Suppl. 1, 361362.Google Scholar
7. Furnas, T. C., Jr., Kunlz, G. S., and Furnas, R. E., Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 25 (1981), 5962.Google Scholar
8. Furnas, T. C., Jr., Lambert, M. C., and Fumas, R. E., Nucl. Instr. Meth., special issue (1982), 245-249.Google Scholar
9. Goetz, A., Diploma thesis, University of Bremen (1993).Google Scholar
10. KanngieBer, B., Ph. D. thesis, University of Bremen (1995).Google Scholar
11. Malmqvist, K. G., and Maenhaut, W., Handbook of X-ray spectrometry: Methods and Techniques, chapter 11, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York (1993).Google Scholar
12. Malzer, W., Goetz, A., personal communication, MeBstellefuer Arbeits-undUmwettschutze. V., Richard- Wagner Str. 22, D-28209 Bremen (1995).Google Scholar
13. Moore, A. W., Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, Vol. 11, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York(1973).Google Scholar
14. Wittkopp, A., Ph. D. thesis, University of Bremen (1993).Google Scholar