Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:53:50.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of Soft and Hard Scattered X-Rays as an Internal Standard for Light Element Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

David L. Taylor
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii Honolulu, Hawaii 96822
George Andermann
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii Honolulu, Hawaii 96822
Get access

Abstract

In the research described, the use of scattered x-rays has been successfully applied as an internal standard for the analysis of calcium in aqueous specimens containing a wide range of matrix components. In addition to the demonstration of the utility of scattered x-rays for light element analysis, some comments are offered on the fundamental aspects of this technique, since to date the method has not been explained thoroughly. The present research represents a continued effort to determine the fundamental importance of various parameters intrinsic to any collection of atoms undergoing scattering, such as the Rayleigh-Compton ratio, the scattering angle, the wave length utilized, and the presence or absence of discontinuities in the matrix absorption coefficient. It has been concluded that large values of the scattering angle coupled with short wavelength tend to yield improved internal compensation. The results also indicate that for light matrices the Compton component of the scattered continuum is of particular importance in achieving good internal standardization for matrix effects.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Hasler, M. F., Kemp, J. W. and Andermann, G., “New Instruments and Techniques Applicable to X-Ray Spectrochemical Analysis,” Proceedings, Conference on Industrial Applications of X-Ray Analysis, Fourth Annual, University of Denver Press, Denver, (1955 ).Google Scholar
2. Andermann, G., and Kemp, J. W., “Scattered X-Rays as Internal Standards in X-Ray Emission Spectroscopy,” Anal. Chem., 30, 13061309, (1958).Google Scholar
3. Harvey, C. E., A Method of Semi-Quantitative Spectrochemical Analysis, Applied Research Laboratories, Glendale, California, 1947.Google Scholar
4. Kalman, Z. H. and Heller, L., “Theoretical Study of X-Ray Fluorescent Determination of Traces of Heavy Elements in a Light Matrix,” Anal. Chem, 34, 946951, (1962).Google Scholar
5. Champion, K. P., Taylor, J. C. and Whittem, R. H., “Rapid X-Ray Fluorescence Determination of Traces of Strontium in Samples of Biological and Geological Origin,” Anal. Chem., 109112, (1966).Google Scholar
6. Kemp, J. W. and Andermann, G., “Refinements in X-Ray Emission Techniques,” Spectrochim. Acta, 8, 114A, (1956), (abstract.)Google Scholar
7. Campbell, W. J. and Brown, J. D., “X-Ray Absorption and Emission, ” Anal. Chem. Analytical Reviews, 36, 312R328R, (1964).Google Scholar
8. Compton, A. H. and Allison, S. K., X-Rays in Theory and Experiment, P. Van Nostrand, Princeton, New Jersey, 1935, p. 192193.Google Scholar
9. Gingrich, N. S., “The Diffraction of X-Rays by Liquid Elements, ” Rev. Mod. Phys., 15, 90110, (1943).Google Scholar
10. Riley, D. P., “Background Scattering in Powder Photographs,” in Peiser, H. S., Rooks, H. P. by and Wilson, A. J. C., Eds., X-Ray Diffraction by Polycrystalline Materials, Reinhold, New York, 1960, 0. 433435.Google Scholar
11. Smallbone, A. H., “Briquetting, X-Ray Techniques Refine On-Stream Analysis,” Rock Products, 68, 6063, (1965).Google Scholar
12. Stever, K. R., Johnson, J. L. and Heady, H. H., ‘X-Ray Analysis of Tungsten-Molybdenum Metals and Electrolytes,’ in W. M. Mueller, Ed., Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 4, Plenum Press, New York, 1962, p. 474487.Google Scholar
13. Cullen, T. J., ‘X-Ray Spec trographic Analys is of Alloyed Copper,’ in J. E. Forrette and E. Lanterman, Eds., Developments in Applied Spectroscopy, Vol. 3, Plenum Press, New York, 1964, p. 97103.Google Scholar
14. Lytle, F. W., Dye, W. B. and Seim, H. J., ‘Determination of Trace Elements in Plant Materials by Fluorescent X-Ray Ana lysis,’ in II, M. Mueller , E d . , Advances in X-Ray Analysis, Vol. 5, Plenum Press, New York, 1962, p. 433446.Google Scholar
15. Boyd, B, R. and Dryer, H, T., ‘Analysis of Nonmetallics by X-Ray Fluorescence Techniques ,’ in J. R. Ferraro and J. S. Ziomek, Eds., Developments in Applied Spectroscopy, Vol. 2, Plenum Press, New York, 1963, p. 335349.Google Scholar
16. Ganivet, M. and Arnal, T., ‘Dosage du Plutonium dans les Alliages Plutonium-Aluminium par Fluorescence-X,’ Anal. Chim. Acta, 3 9, 7379, (1967).Google Scholar
17. Lubecki, A., Wasilewska, M. and Gorski, L., ‘On the Application of Compton Scattering to the Elimination of Matrix Effects in Non-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis,’ Spectrochim. Acta, 23A, 831840, (1967).Google Scholar
18. Martinelli, P. and Blanquet, P., ‘Application des Sources de Rayons Gamma au Dosage des Elements Lourds par Flucrescence-X,’ Symp. Radiochem. Methods Anal, Salsburg, 1964, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1965, p. 451467.Google Scholar
19. Jenkins, R. and De Vries, J. L., Practical X-Ray Spectrometry, Springer-Verlag, New York, Inc., New York, 1967, p. 95.Google Scholar
20. Compton, A. H. and Allison, S. K., X-Rays in Theory and Experiment, D. Van Hostrand, Princeton, New Jersey, 1935, p. 139140.Google Scholar