Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:47:54.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Formalism for the Evaluation of Pseudo-Macro Stress Fields σ33(z) from Q-AND ψ-Mode Diffraction Experiments Performed with Synchrotron Radiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

H. Ruppersberg
H. Ruppersberg*
Affiliation:
FB Werkstoffwissenschaften Universität des Saarlandes D-6600 Saarbrücken, Germany
Get access

Abstract

A self-consistent scheme is proposed for the evaluation of stressfields which vary strongly within the penetration depth of the X-rays in polycrystalline specimens which are elastically isotropic and homogeneous on a macroscopic scale. Very precise diffraction experiments have to be performed for practical applications.

Type
VII. Stress Determination by Diffraction Methods
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 35 , Issue A: First Pacific-International Congress on X-ray Analytical Methods (PICXAM). Fortieth Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis, August 7-16, 1991 , 1991 , pp. 481 - 487
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Noyan, I.C. and Cohen, J.B., Residual Stress Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation. Springer (1987).Google Scholar
2. Wolfstieg, U. and Macherauch, E., HTM 31 (1976) 83; Wakabayashi, M., Nakuyama, M. and Nagata, A., J. Japan Soc. Prec. Eng. 43 (1977) 661,Google Scholar
3. Winholtz, R.A. and Cohen, J.B., Adv. X-Ray Anal. 32 (1989) 341.Google Scholar
4. Hauk, V. and H.-J. Nikolin, Texture and Microstructures 8&9 (1988) 693.Google Scholar
5. Nishioka, K., Hanabusa, T. and Fujiwara, H., Scripta Met. 8 (1974) 1349.Google Scholar
6. Noyan, I.C., Metall. Trans. 14A (1983) 1907.Google Scholar
7. Berveiller, M., Krier, J., Ruppersberg, H. and C.N.J. Wagner, Proc. IC0TOM 9, in print.Google Scholar
8. Ruppersberg, H., Detetnple, I. and Krier, J., phys. stat. sol. (a) 116 (1989) 681.Google Scholar
9. Ruppersberg, H., Detetnple, I. and Krier, J., Z. f. Kristallographie, in print.Google Scholar
10. Evenschor, P.D. and Hauk, V., Z. Metallkde. 66 (1975) 210.Google Scholar
11. Krier, J., Ruppersberg, H., Berveiller, M. and Liplnski, P., Proc. ICOTOM 9, in print.Google Scholar