Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-24T11:16:59.081Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of Inverse Laplace and Numerical Inversion Methods for Obtaining Z-Depth Profiles of Diffraction Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2019

Xiaojing Zhu ,
Paul Predecki  and
Benjamin Ballard
Xiaojing Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Denver Denver CO 80208, USA
Paul Predecki
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Denver Denver CO 80208, USA
Benjamin Ballard
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Denver Denver CO 80208, USA
Get access

Abstract

Two different inversion methods, the inverse Laplace method and the linear constrained numerical method, for retrieving the z-profiles of diffraction data from experimentally obtained τ-profiles were compared using tests with a known function as the original z-profile. Two different real data situations were simulated to determine the effects of specimen thickness and missing τ-profiles data at small τ-values on the retrieved z-profiles. The results indicate that although both methods are able to retrieve the z-profiles in the bulk specimens satisfactorily, the numerical method can be used for thin film samples as well. Missing τ-profile data at small τ values causes error in the retrieved z-profiles with both methods, particularly when the trend of the τ-profile at small τ is significantly changed because of the missing data

Type
III. Applications of Diffraction to Semiconductors and Films
Information
Advances in X-Ray Analysis , Volume 38: Forty-third Annual Conference on Applications of X-ray Analysis , 1994 , pp. 263 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dolle, H. and Hauk, V., Harterei Techn Mitt, 31, 165, (1976).Google Scholar
2. Roll, E.D., Pangborn, R.N. and Amateau, M.F., in “Non-destructive Characterization of Materials II”, 595–603, Plenum Press, (1987).Google Scholar
3. Predecki, P., Powder Diffraction, 8[2], 122–126, (1993).Google Scholar
4. Zhu, X. and Predecki, P., Advances in X-ray Analysis, 37, 197–203, (1994)Google Scholar
5. Zhu, X., Ballard, B. and Predecki, P., paper elsewhere in these proceedings.Google Scholar
6. Press, W.H. et al., Numerical Recipes, The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, (1992).Google Scholar