Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:54:17.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Standard Descriptive Vocabulary and Archaeology Digital Data Collection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2017

Caroline Beebe
Caroline Beebe*
Affiliation:
Affiliate, Department of Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana47405, USA ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Archaeology has embraced the shift to digital technology for collecting, analyzing, and sharing data. Digital repositories are now recognized as essential for data stewardship and are setting standards for data deposition. These new technologies and systems support the scientific need for reproducible results through intra-cultural as well as cross-cultural hypothesis testing. Methods of digital data collection in the field, however, are often site specific, restricted by the limited availability of digital technologies, or not well suited for creating systems that support the requirements of the new digital information paradigm. As a small science project, the Chau Hiix Project in Belize will provide examples of the pitfalls in and insights about shifting to digital technology to make its primary data shareable and reusable. These experiences suggest the need for an international collaborative agenda that develops digital data description standards based on controlled vocabulary, facet analysis, and crosswalks implemented at the analog point of collection.

La arqueología ha aceptado con entusiasmo la transición hacia la tecnología digital para la recolección, análisis e intercambio de datos. Los repositorios digitales son ahora reconocidos como herramientas esenciales para la administración de datos y están estableciendo normas para el almacenamiento e intercambio de información. Estas nuevas tecnologías y sistemas apoyan la necesidad científica de obtener resultados reproducibles a través de la comprobación de hipótesis tanto intra como interculturalmente. Sin embargo, los métodos de recolección de datos digitales en el campo a menudo son específicos para cierta ubicación, están restringidos por la limitada disponibilidad de tecnologías digitales o enfrentan dificultades para crear sistemas que soporten los requerimientos del nuevo paradigma de información digital. Como un pequeño proyecto de ciencias, el Proyecto Chau Hiix en Belice proporcionará ejemplos de las perspectivas y dificultades relacionados con la transición a la tecnología digital con el objetivo de permitir el intercambio y reutilización de sus datos primarios. Estas experiencias sugieren la necesidad de un programa de colaboración internacional que desarrolle estándares de descripción de datos digitales basados en un vocabulario controlado, el análisis de facetas y la implementación de puentes en los puntos análogos del proceso de recolección de la información.

Type
Articles
Information
Advances in Archaeological Practice , Volume 5 , Special Issue 3: FOR THE RECORD: ARCHAEOLOGICAL ARCHIVES IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY , August 2017 , pp. 250 - 264
Copyright
Copyright 2017 © Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Andres, Christopher R. 2005 Building Negotiation: Architecture and Sociopolitical Transformation at Chau Hiix, Lamanai, and Altun Ha, Belize. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Andres, Christopher R., and Anne Pyburn, K. 2004 Out of Sight: The Postclassic and Early Colonial Periods at Chau Hiix, Belize. In The Terminal Classic in the Maya Lowlands: Collapse, Transition, and Transformation, edited by Demarest, Arthur A., Rice, Prudence M., and Rice, Don S., pp. 402–423. University of Colorado Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
ArchaeoCore 2015 Institute of Fine Arts, NYU. Electronic document, http://www.ifaresearch.org/archaeocore/, accessed April 20, 2017.Google Scholar
Archaeological Data Services/Digital Antiquity (ADS) 2011 Guides to Good Practice. Electronic document, http://guides.archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/, accessed November 6, 2016.Google Scholar
Art & Architecture Thesaurus (AAT) 2015 The Getty Research Institute. Electronic document, http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/aat/, accessed November 8, 2016.Google Scholar
Beebe, Caroline 1998 Joining the Club: Issues, Problems and Practices Initiating GIS. In New Techniques for Old Times: CAA 98—Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, edited by Barcelo, Juan A., Briz, Ivan, and Vila, Assumpció, pp. 89–95. BAR Archaeology Series 757. Archaeopress, Oxford.Google Scholar
Beebe, Caroline 2006 Bridging the Semantic Gap: Exploring Descriptive Vocabulary for Image Structure. PhD dissertation, School of Library and Information Science, Indiana University, Bloomington. Electronic document, https://ils.unc.edu/~wildem/ASIST2007/Beebe_dissertation.pdf, accessed March 3, 2017.Google Scholar
Beebe, Caroline 2010 The Chau Hiix Archive: Principles, Problems, and Solutions. Paper presented at the 75th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, St. Louis. Electronic document, http://alexandriaarchive.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/BEEBE.ChauHiixDigitalArchive.pdf, accessed November 9, 2016.Google Scholar
Berenz, Elizabeth, Burns, Ann R. F., and Wall Stylianopoulos, Lucie 2013 Cataloging in the Cloud: Shared Shelf and ArchaeoCore. VRA Bulletin 39 (2/2). Electronic document, http://online.vraweb.org/vrab/vol39/iss2/2, accessed April 20, 2017.Google Scholar
Burke, Heather, Smith, Claire, and Zimmerman, Larry J. 2009 The Archaeologist's Field Handbook: North American Edition. Alta Mira Press, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Carlis, John, and Maguire, Joseph 2001 Mastering Data Modeling: A User-Driven Approach. Addison-Wesley, Boston, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Clarke, Mary 2015 The Digital Dilemma: Preservation and the Digital Archaeological Record. Advances in Archaeological Practice 3:313–330.Google Scholar
Cook, Patricia M. 1997 Basal Platform Mounds at Chau Hiix, Belize: Evidence for Ancient Maya Social Structure and Cottage Industry Manufacturing. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Cuddy, Thomas W. 2000 Socioeconomic Integration of the Classic Maya State: Political and Domestic Economies in a Residential Neighborhood. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
Digital Antiquity 2013 The Digital Archaeological Record (tDAR). Electronic Document, https://core.tdar.org, accessed November 9, 2016.Google Scholar
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative 2015 Metadata Basics. Electronic document, http://dublincore.org/metadata-basics/, accessed November 9, 2016.Google Scholar
Eiteljorg, Harrison 1994 The Archaeological Data Archive Project (ADAP). Electronic document, http://csanet.org/archive/adap/adaplond.html, accessed November 5, 2016.Google Scholar
Eiteljorg, Harrison 2008 Archaeological Computing. 2nd ed. Electronic document, http://archcomp.csanet.org, accessed November 5, 2016.Google Scholar
Flood, Josephine, Johnson, Ian, and Sullivan, Sharon (editors) 1989 Sites and Bytes: Recording Aboriginal Places in Australia. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, A. Sean 2006 The Houselots of Chau Hiix: A Spatial Approach to the Study of Non-Elite Domestic Variability at a Small Maya City. PhD dissertation, Department of Archaeology, University of Calgary, Alberta.Google Scholar
Gruber, Tom 2007 Ontology. Electronic document. http://tomgruber.org/writing/ontology-definition-2007.htm, accessed June 21, 2017.Google Scholar
Hedden, Heather 2016 The Accidental Taxonomist. 2nd ed. Information Today Inc., Medford, New Jersey.Google Scholar
International Committee for Documentation 2006 CIDOC CRM. Electronic document, http://www.cidoc-crm.org, accessed March 1, 2017.Google Scholar
Kipfer, Barbara Ann 2007 The Archaeologist's Fieldwork Companion. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Kulasekaran, Sivakumar, Trelogan, Jessica, Esteva, Maria, and Johnson, Michael 2014 Metadata Integration for an Archaeology Collection Architecture. Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications. Austin. Electronic document, http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/pubs/article/view/3702/1925, accessed March 3, 2017.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Smith, Lindsay 2016 Archaeology: Principles and Practices of Digital Data Management. In Bringing Digital Data Management Training into Methods Courses for Anthropology, edited by Femenías, Blenda. American Anthropological Association, Arlington, Virginia. Electronic document, http://www.americananthro.org/LearnAndTeach/Landing.aspx?ItemNumber=20641&navItemNumber=20708, accessed November 8, 2016.Google Scholar
Miksa, Francis 1984 The Development of Classification at the Library of Congress. University of Illinois Occasional Paper No. 164. Electronic document, https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/3957/gslisoccasionalpv00000i00164.pdf, accessed November 8, 2016.Google Scholar
Open Context 2007 The Alexandria Archive Institute. Electronic document, https://alexandriaarchive.org/what-we-do/open-context/, accessed March 1, 2017.Google Scholar
Pyburn, K. Anne 2003 The Hydrology of Chau Hiix. Ancient Mesoamerica 14:123–129.Google Scholar
Pyburn, K. Anne 2008 Pomp and Circumstance before Belize: Ancient Maya Commerce and the New River Conurbation. In The Ancient City: New Perspectives on Urbanism in the Old and New World, edited by Marcus, Joyce and Sabloff, Jeremy, pp. 247–272. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC; School of American Research, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Ranganathan, Shiyali Ramamrita 1967 Prolegomena to Library Classification. 3rd ed. Ranganathan Series in Library Science Vol. 20. Asia Publishing House, London.Google Scholar
Sanders, G. Lawrence 1995 Data Modeling. Boyd & Fraser, Danvers, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Sharp, Kayeleigh, and Litschi, Melissa 2014 Maximizing E-Data Collection: A Novel Approach for Data Collection and Transmission Using Tablet Technology. Advances in Archaeological Practice 2:104–122.Google Scholar
Simpson, Duncan 2004 Risk of Loss of Digital Data and the Reasons It Occurs: Case Studies and Analysis. Digital Preservation Coalition. Electronic document, http://www.dpconline.org/docman/miscellaneous/members/117-risk-of-loss-of-digital-data/file, accessed March 1, 2017.Google Scholar
Visual Resource Association (VRA) 2007 VRA Core 4.0. Electronic document, http://www.loc.gov/standards/vracore/, accessed November 9, 2016.Google Scholar
Wille, Sarah J. 2007 Sociopolitics and Community-building: The Entanglement of Pre-Hispanic Maya Culture, Objects, and Place at Chau Hiix, Belize. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Wrobel, Gabriel D. G. 2003 Metric and Nonmetric Dental Variation Among the Ancient Maya of Northern Belize. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar