Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T19:40:15.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Society for American Archaeology’s Task Forces on Landscape Policy Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2017

Jeffrey H. Altschul
Jeffrey H. Altschul*
Affiliation:
Statistical Research, Inc., Tucson, AZ (jhaltschul@sricrm. com)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The management of cultural resources by federal land-managing agencies in the United States is moving in the direction of programmatic approaches that consider archaeological resources on a regional or landscape level. In 2014, the Society for American Archaeology (SAA), in response to meetings with federal agencies, established three task forces on issues related to landscape-scale cultural resource management (CRM). The task forces focused on: (1) survey data quality, durability, and use; (2) incorporating archaeological resources in regional land-use plans; and (3) valuing archaeological resources. Revised reports of the task forces are being published in this issue of Advances in Archaeological Practice. This paper provides the context and history of the task forces, particularly the CRM challenges facing federal land-managing agencies leading to the selection of topics that are subjects of the published articles.

CRM, por sus siglas en inglés) que realizan los organismos federales dedicados a la planeación territorial en los Estados Unidos están desarrollando enfoques programáticos que incluyen a los recursos arqueológicos en la escala regional o del paisaje. En 2014, la Society for American Archaeology, como resultado de las reuniones que sostuvo con organismos federales, estableció tres grupos de trabajo para bordar distintos temas relacionados con la administración de recursos culturales en el paisaje. Los equipos de trabajo se centraron en los siguientes temas: (1) la calidad, durabilidad y uso de los datos de la investigación; (2) la incorporación de recursos arqueológicos en los planes regionales de ordenamiento territorial; y (3) la determinación del valor de los recursos arqueológicos. Los informes revisados que elaboraron los grupos de trabajo se publican en este número de Advances in Archaeological Practice. Este artículo provee el contexto y los antecedentes que dieron lugar a los grupos de trabajo. Particularmente, éste mismo analiza los retos a los que se enfrentan las agencias federales de planeación territorial y que se desprenden de la administración de recursos culturales, los cuales inciden en la selección de temas que son el objeto de estudio de los artículos que se publican en este volumen.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Archaeological Practice , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , May 2016 , pp. 102 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2016

References

References Cited

Altschul, Jeffrey H. 2014. Landscapes: A Tool for Cultural Resource Management? In SAA Government Affairs and International Government Affairs Update, May 2014:6–7. Washington, D.C. Electronic document, http://ecommerce.saa.org/saa/staticcontent/staticpages/GovAff/May2014.pdf, accessed August 19, 2015.Google Scholar
Clement, Joel P., Belin, Alletta d’A., Bean, Michael J., Boling, Ted A., and Lyons, James R. 2014. A Strategy for Improving Mitigation Policies and Practices of the Department of the Interior: A Report to the Secretary of the Interior from the Energy and Climate Change Task Force. Washington, D.C. Electronic document, http://www.doi.gov/news/upload/Mitigation-Report-to-the-Secretary_FINAL_04_08_14.pdf, accessed August 19, 2015.Google Scholar
Doelle, William H., Barker, Pat, Cushman, David, Heilen, Michael, Herhahn, Cynthia, and Rieth, Christina 2016. Incorporating Archaeological Resources in Landscape-Level Planning and Management. Advances in Archaeological Practice 4(2):118–131.Google Scholar
Laurenzi, Andy, Peeples, Matthew A., and Doelle, William H. 2013. Cultural Resources Priority Area Planning in Sub-Mogollon Arizona and New Mexico. Advances in Archaeological Practice 1(2):61–76.Google Scholar
Jewell, Sally 2013. Improving Mitigation Policies and Practices of the Department of the Interior. Electronic document, https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/migrated/news/upload/Secretarial-Order-Mitigation.pdf, accessed September 6, 2015.Google Scholar
McManamon, Francis P., Doershuk, John, Lipe, William D., McCulloch, Tom, Polglase, Christopher, Schlanger, Sarah, Sebastian, Lynne, Sullivan, Lynne, and Childs, S. Terry 2016. Managing Archaeological Resources at a Landscape Scale. Advances in Archaeological Practice 4(2):132–148.Google Scholar
Wilshusen, Richard H., Heilen, Michael, Catts, Wade, de Dufour, Karyn, and Jones, Brad 2016. Archaeological Survey Data Quality, Durability, and Use: Findings and Recommendations. Advances in Archaeological Practice 4(2):106–117.Google Scholar