Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T05:17:00.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incorporating Archaeological Resources in Landscape-Level Planning and Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2017

William H. Doelle ,
Pat Barker ,
David Cushman ,
Michael Heilen ,
Cynthia Herhahn  and
Christina Rieth
William H. Doelle
Affiliation:
Archaeology Southwest ([email protected])
Pat Barker
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Reno ([email protected])
David Cushman
Affiliation:
SRI Foundation ([email protected])
Michael Heilen
Affiliation:
Statistical Research, Inc. ([email protected])
Cynthia Herhahn
Affiliation:
Bureau of Land Management, New Mexico State Office ([email protected])
Christina Rieth
Affiliation:
New York State Museum ([email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The increasing importance of landscape-scale research and preservation goals within the archaeological profession coincides with expanded threats to the archaeological record through massive energy exploration and infrastructure projects and through the cumulative effects of smaller-scale development. It is further stimulated by the recognition that conservation strategies that span multiple resource classes and disciplines are best formulated at multiple and larger spatial scales. These are key drivers behind efforts to improve the ways that archaeological resources are considered in the context of development-related planning and implementation, including mitigation measures. In a prominent example, recent department-level direction from the Secretary of the Interior calls specifically for landscape-level planning as a critical component of responses to both large-scale development and climate change. This article reviews three current approaches to landscape-level planning in archaeology and calls for increased commitment to advancing their development and effectiveness.

Dentro de la arqueología, la creciente importancia de investigaciones a nivel de paisaje y objetivos de conservación coincide con nuevas amenazas al registro arqueológico creadas tanto por proyectos de exploración e infraestructura para la generación masiva de energía como por los efectos cumulativos del desarrollo en pequeña escala. Ésta se estimula más al reconocer que las estrategias de conservación que abarcan varias disciplinas y categorías de recursos se formulan mejor en escalas espaciales múltiples y más grandes. Estos son factores impulsores claves en los esfuerzos por mejorar la consideración de los recursos arqueológicos en el contexto de la planificación y ejecución de los proyectos de desarrollo, incluyendo las medidas de mitigación. En un ejemplo destacado reciente, el Secretario del Interior exigió expresamente y a nivel de departamento la planificación a nivel de paisaje como componente crítico de las respuestas tanto al desarrollo en escala grande como al cambio climático. Este artículo revisa tres enfoques actuales para la planificación a nivel de paisaje en la arqueología y pide un mayor compromiso con fomentar su desarrollo y eficacia.

Type
Research Article
Information
Advances in Archaeological Practice , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , May 2016 , pp. 118 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2016

References

References Cited

Altschul, Jeffrey H. 1988. Models and the Modeling Process. In Quantifying the Past and Predicting the Past: Theory, Method, and Application of Archaeological Predictive Modeling, edited by Judge, W. James and Sebastian, Lynne, pp. 61–96. USDI Bureau of Land Management, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
Altschul, Jeffrey H. 1990. Red Flag Models: The Use of Modeling in Management Contexts. In Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, edited by Allen, Kathleen M. S., Green, Stanton W., and Zubrow, Ezra B. W., pp. 226–238. Taylor and Francis, London, England.Google Scholar
Altschul, Jeffrey H. 2016. The Society for American Archaeology’s Task Forces on Landscape Policy Issues. Advances in Archaeological Practice 4(2):102–105.Google Scholar
Altschul, Jeffrey H., Sebastian, Lynne, and Heidelberg, Kurt 2004. Predictive Modeling in the Military: Similar Goals, Divergent Paths. Legacy Resource Management Program Project No.03-167. Preservation Research Series 1. SRI Foundation, Rio Rancho, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Anscheutz, Kurt F., Wilshusen, Richard H., and Scheick, Cherie L. 2001. An Archaeology of Landscapes: Perspectives and Directions. Journal of Archaeological Research 9(2):157–211.Google Scholar
Barker, Pat 2009. The Process Made Me Do It: Or Would a Reasonably Intelligent Person Agree that CRM Is Reasonably Intelligent? In Archaeology and Public Policy: New Visions for the Future, edited by Sebastian, Lynne and Lipe, William, pp. 65–90. School for Advanced Research, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Barton, C. M., Bernabeu, Joan, Aura, J. Emili, Garcia, Oreta, Schmich, Steven, and Molina, Lluis 2004. Long-Term Socioecology and Contingent Landscapes. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 11(3):253–295.Google Scholar
Bender, Barbara (editor) 1993. Landscape: Politics and Perspectives. Berg, London.Google Scholar
Bettinger, Robert L. 1975. The Surface Archaeology of Owens Valley, Eastern California: Prehistoric Man–land Relationships in the Great Basin. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside.Google Scholar
Bettinger, Robert L. 1979. Multivariate Statistical Analysis of a Regional Subsistence Model for Owens Valley. American Antiquity 44(3):455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettinger, Robert L. 1991. Hunter-Gatherers: Archaeological and Evolutionary Theory. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Clement, Joel P., Belin, Alletta d’A., Bean, Michael J., Boling, Ted A., and Lyons, James R. 2014. A Strategy for Improving the Mitigation Policies and Practices of the Department of Interior: A Report to the Secretary of the Interior from the Energy and Climate Change Task Force. Washington, D.C. Electronic document, http://www.doe.gov/new/upload/Mitigation-Report-to-the-Secretary_04_08_14_FINAL.pdf, accessed March 12, 2016.Google Scholar
Crumley, Carole, and Marquardt, William H. 1990. Landscape: A Unifying Concept in Regional Analysis. In Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, edited by Allen, Kathleen, Green, Stanton, and Zubrow, Ezra, pp. 73–79. Taylor and Francis, London.Google Scholar
Cushman, David 2002. Priority Cultural Resources in Pima County: The Sonoran Desert Conservation Plan. Report on file, Pima County, Arizona.Google Scholar
David, Bruno, and Thomas, Julian 2008. Landscape Archaeology: Introduction. In Handbook of Landscape Archaeology, edited by David, Bruno and Thomas, Julian, pp.27–43. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Ebert, James I. 2001. Distributional Archaeology. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Fowles, Severin 2010. The Southwest School of Landscape Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology 39:453–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gailing, Ludger, and Leibenath, Markus 2015. The Social Construction of Landscapes: Two Theoretical Lenses and Their Empirical Applications. Landscape Research 40(2):1–16.Google Scholar
Green, Paul R., Altschul, Jeffrey H., Heilen, Michael, Cushman, David W., Homburg, Jeffrey A., Lerch, Michael K., Hayden, William E., and Trampier, Joshua R. 2012. Integrating Archaeological Modeling in DoD Cultural Resource Compliance. Report submitted to the Environmental Security and Technology Certification Program, Project RC-200720. SRI Foundation, Rio Rancho, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Head, Lesley 2008. Geographical Scale in Understanding Human Landscapes. In Handbook of Landscape Archaeology, edited by David, Bruno and Thomas, Julian, pp.379–385. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Heilen, Michael, Leckman, Phillip O., Byrd, Adam, Homburg, Jeffrey A., and Heckman, Robert A. 2013. Archaeological Sensitivity Modeling in Southern New Mexico: Automated Tools and Models for Planning and Management. Statistical Research, Inc. Technical Report 11–26. Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
Michael, Heilen, Reddy, Seetha, Altschul, Jeffrey, Heckman, Robert, and Norris, Stephen 2015. Archaeological Locational and Significance Modeling at San Clemente Island, California. Draft Technical Report 15–58. Statistical Research, Inc., Redlands, California.Google Scholar
Heilen, Michael P., Schiffer, Michael B., and Reid, J. Jefferson 2008. Landscape Formation Processes. In Handbook of Landscape Archaeology, edited by David, Bruno and Thomas, Julian, pp. 601–608. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Heilen, Michael, Sebastian, Lynne, Altschul, Jeffrey H., Leckman, Phillip O., and Byrd, Adam 2012. Modeling of Archaeological Site Location and Significance at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico. Statistical Research, Inc. Technical Report 12–06. Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
Hood, J.Edward 1996. Social Relations and the Cultural Landscape. In Landscape Archaeology: Reading and Interpreting the American Historical Landscape, edited by Yamin, Rebecca and Metheny, Karen Bescherer, pp.121–146. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Hudak, G.Joseph, Hobbs, Elizabeth, Brooks, Allyson, Sersland, Carol Ann, and Philips, Crystal (editors) 2002. A Predictive Model of Precontact Archaeological Site Location for the State of Minnesota. MnModel Final Report. Mn/DOT Agreement No. 73217. SHPO Ref. No. 95-4098. Electronic document, http://www.mnmodel.dot.state.mn.us/TOC.html, accessed December 1, 2008.Google Scholar
Ingbar, Eric, Barker, Pat, Zeanah, David, Wells, Steve, and Snow, John 2000. Expediting Permitting of Oil and Gas Exploration through Archaeological Modeling. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual International Petroleum Environmental Conference, 2000. University of Tulsa Press, Tulsa. Electronic document, http://ipec.utulsa.edu/conferences, accessed March 12, 2016.Google Scholar
Ingold, Timothy 1993. The Temporality of the Landscape. World Archaeology 25(2):152–174.Google Scholar
Jewell, Sally 2013. Improving Mitigation Policies and Practices of the Department of the Interior. Secretary of the Interior Order No. 3330, October 31, 2013. Electronic document, http://www.doi.gov/news/upload/Secretarial-Order-Mitigation.pdf, accessed March 12, 2016.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mathew 2012. Phenomenological Approaches in Landscape Archaeology. Annual Reviews of Anthropology 41:269–284.Google Scholar
Kelly, Robert L. 1995. The Foraging Spectrum: Diversity in Hunter-Gatherer Lifeways. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Kohler, Timothy A. 1988. Predictive Locational Modeling: History and Current Practice. In Quantifying the Present and Predicting the Past: Theory, Method, andApplication of Archaeological Predictive Modeling, edited by Judge, W. James and Sebastian, Lynne, pp. 19–60. Bureau of Land Management, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
Kvamme, Kenneth 1988. Development and Testing of Quantitative Models. In Quantifying the Present and Predicting the Past: Theory, Method, and Application of Archaeological Predictive Modeling, edited by Judge, W. James and Sebastian, Lynne, pp. 325–428. Bureau of Land Management, Denver, Colorado.Google Scholar
Kvamme, Kenneth 1989. Geographic Information Systems in Regional Archaeological Research and Data Management. In Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 1, edited by Schiffer, Michael B., pp. 139–203. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Laurenzi, Andy 2012. Priority Prehistoric Cultural Resources, Pinal County, Arizona. Technical Report No.2012-101. Archaeology Southwest, Tucson.Google Scholar
Laurenzi, Andy, Peeples, Matthew A., and Doelle, William H. 2013. Cultural Resources Priority Area Planning in Sub-Mogollon Arizona and New Mexico. Advances in Archaeological Practice 1(2):61–76.Google Scholar
McManamon, Frank, Doershuk, John, Lipe, William, McCulloch, Tom, Polglase, Chris, Schlanger, Sarah, Sebastian, Lynne, and Sullivan, Lynne 2016. Using Values to Manage Archaeological Resources at a Landscape Scale. Advances in Archaeological Practice 4(2):132–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrer, Mark, and Wescott, Konnie 2006. GIS and Archaeological Site Location Modeling. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) 1991. How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation. National Register Bulletin 15. National Park Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Peeples, Matthew A., Clark, Jeffery J., Doelle, William H., Laurenzi, Andy, and Mills, Barbara J. 2016. The Big Picture: The National Historic Preservation Act and Regional Syntheses in the U.S. Southwest. Journal of Arizona Archaeology. In press..Google Scholar
Plog, Fred T., and Hill, James N. 1971. Explaining Variability in the Distribution of Sites. In The Distribution of Prehistoric Population Aggregates, edited by Gumerman, George J., pp. 7–36. Prescott College Anthropological Reports 1. Prescott, Arizona.Google Scholar
Raab, L.Mark, and Yatsko, Andrew 1990. Prehistoric Human Ecology of Quinquina, A Research Design for Archaeological Studies on San Clemente Island, Southern California. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 26(2 & 3):10–37.Google Scholar
Raab, L.Mark 2001. Maritime Archaeology and Research Design of Quinquina, San Clemente Island, California. Manuscript on file, Natural Resources Office, Navy Region Southwest, San Diego.Google Scholar
Sebastian, Lynne 2009. Deciding What Matters: Archaeology, Eligibility, and Significance. In Archaeology and Cultural Resource Management, Visions for the Future, edited by Sebastian, Lynne and Lipe, William, pp. 91–114. School for Advanced Research Press, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Sebastian, Lynne Van West, C., and Altschul, Jeffrey H. 2005. Adaptive Management and Planning Models for Cultural Resources in Oil and Gas Fields: New Mexico PUMP III Project-Experimental: The New Mexico Modeling Project. In Adaptive Management and Planning Models for Cultural Resources in Oil and Gas Fields in New Mexico and Wyoming: Final Technical Report (DE-FC26-02NT15445), edited by E. Ingbar et al., pp. 35–47. Department of Energy Technical Report. Electronic document at: http://new.gnomon.net/Links, accessed February 7, 2016.Google Scholar
Steward, Julian 1938. Basin-Plateau Aboriginal Socio-Political Groups. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 120. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Steward, Julian 1955. The Theory of Culture Change. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Strang, Veronica 2008. Uncommon Ground: Landscapes as Social Geography. In Handbook of Landscape Archaeology, edited by David, Bruno and Thomas, Julian, pp.51–59. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Alan P. III, 2001. Surface Archaeology. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Alan P. III 2008. Archaeological Concepts for the Study of the Past. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Thomas, David.H. 1971. Prehistoric Settlement-Subsistence Patterns in the Reese River Valley, Central Nevada. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Thomas, David.H. 1972. A Computer Simulation Model of Great Basin Shoshonean Subsistence and Settlement Patterns. In Models in Archaeology, edited by Clarke, David L., pp. 671–704. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Thomas, David.H. 1973. An Empirical Test for Steward’s Model of Great Basin Settlement Patterns. American Antiquity 38(1):155–176.Google Scholar
Thomas, David.H. 1983. The Archaeology of Monitor Valley, I: Epistemology. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History 58(1), New York.Google Scholar
Thomas, David.H. 1988. The Archaeology of Monitor Valley, III: Survey and Additional Excavations. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History 66(2). New York.Google Scholar
Thomas, Julian, 1996. Time, Culture and Identity. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Tilley, Christopher 1994. A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths and Monuments. Berg, Oxford.Google Scholar
Trigger, Bruce G. 1989. A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
van der Leeuw, Sander, , and Redman, Charles L. 2002. Placing Archaeology at the Center of Socio-Natural Studies. American Antiquity 67:597–605.Google Scholar
Wandsnider, LuAnn 1998. Regional Scale Processes and Archaeological Landscape Units. In Unit Issues in Archaeology: Measuring Time, Space, and Material, edited by Ramenofsky, Ann R. and Steffen, Anastasia, pp. 87–102. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Wandsnider, LuAnn and Rossignol, Jacqueline (editors) 1992. Space, Time, and Archaeological Landscapes. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Whittlesey, Stephanie M. 2004. Mesoamerica, the Hohokam, and the Tucson Basin. In Pots, Potters, and Models: Archaeological Investigations at the SRI Locus of the West Branch Site, Tucson, Arizona: Vol. 2. Synthesis and Interpretations, edited by Whittlesey, Stephanie. M., pp. 509–530. Technical Series No. 80. Statistical Research, Inc., Tucson, Arizona, and Redlands, California.Google Scholar
Wilshusen, Richard, Heilen, Michael, Catts, Wade, de Dufour, Karyn, and Jones, Bradford 2016. Archaeological Survey Data Quality, Durability, and Use: Findings and Recommendations. Advances in Archaeological Practice 4(2):106–117.Google Scholar
Wu, Jianguo, and Qi, Ye 2000. Dealing with Scale in Landscape Analysis: An Overview. Geographic Information Sciences 6(1):1–5.Google Scholar
Zeanah, David W., Ingbar, Eric, Elston, Robert, and Zeier, Charles 2004. Archaeological Predictive Model, Management Plan, and Treatment Plans for Northern Railroad Valley, Nevada. Cultural Resources Series 15. Reno: Bureau of Land Management, Nevada. Electronic document, http://www.blm.gov/nv, accessed March 12, 2016.Google Scholar
Zedeño, María Nieves 1997. Landscapes, Land Use, and the History of Territory Formation: An Example from the Puebloan Southwest. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 4:67–103.Google Scholar
Zedeño, María Nieves 2000. On What People Make of Places: A Behavioral Cartography. In Social Theory in Archaeology, edited by Schiffer, Michael B., pp. 97–111. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Doelle et al. supplementary material

Appendix A

Download Doelle et al. supplementary material(File)
File 26.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Doelle et al. supplementary material

Appendix B

Download Doelle et al. supplementary material(File)
File 15.7 KB