Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:39:13.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fragments of the Past

Microartifact Analysis of Use Surfaces at Tumilaca la Chimba, Moquegua, Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2017

Bradley J. Parker
Affiliation:
University of Utah, 201 South Presidents Circle Room 201 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 ([email protected])
Nicola Sharratt
Affiliation:
Georgia State University, Department of Anthropology, Sparks Hall, Suite 335 Atlanta, GA 30303 ([email protected])

Abstract

Microartifact analysis, the study of the density and distribution of tiny (yet visible) fragments of ceramics, bone, worked stone, and other microartifacts, offers a promising solution to the challenges of determining the location and nature of activity areas at archaeological sites. In spite of the fact that microartifact analysis has been successfully applied at sites in North America and the Middle East, archaeologists have yet to recognize the utility of this methodology in most of the rest of the world. The purpose of this article is, therefore, to test whether this methodology can be profitably applied in the southern Andes. To do so, we describe the results of microartifact sampling, processing, and analytical techniques that we applied to two phases of occupation at the site of Tumilaca la Chimba in southern Peru. The results of the research outlined in this article suggest that microartifact analysis is an effective analytical technique that can contribute greatly to archaeological praxis.

El estudio de la densidad y la distribución de diminutos (aunque visibles) fragmentos de cerámica, hueso, piedra trabajada y otros microartefactos varios—llamado análisis de microartefactos—ofrece una prometedora solución a los retos que se presentan al intentar determinar la ubicación y naturaleza de las áreas de actividad en los sitios arqueológicos. A pesar de que el análisis de microartefactos ha sido utilizado exitosamente en sitios arqueológicos en Norteamérica y el Medio Oriente, los arqueólogos en otras partes del mundo no han implementado esta metodología de manera recurrente. Por lo tanto, el propósito de este artículo es poner a prueba la utilidad de esta metodología en la zona sur de los Andes peruanos. Para lograrlo, describimos los resultados obtenidos de la toma de muestras, el procesamiento y la aplicación de técnicas análiticas a los microartefactos recuperados de dos fases de ocupación distintas en el sitio arqueológico Tumilaca la Chimba, en el sur de Perú. Los resultados de la investigación, descritos en esta publicación, sugieren que el análisis de microartefactos es una técnica análitica eficaz que puede contribuir en gran medida a la práctica arqueológica de la región.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright 2017 © Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES CITED

Arnold, Philip J. 1990 The Organization of Refuse Disposal and Ceramic Production within Contemporary Mexican Houselots. American Anthropologist 92 (4):915932.Google Scholar
Bandy, Matthew 2001 Population and History in the Ancient Titicaca Basin. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bawden, Garth 1989 The Tumilaca Site and Post-Tiahuanaco Occupational Stratigraphy in the Moquegua Drainage. In Ecology, Settlement and History in the Osmore Drainage, Peru, edited by Rice, Don S., Stanish, Charles, and Scarr, Phillip R., pp. 287302. BAR International Series, vol. ii. BAR, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bawden, Garth 1993 An Archaeological Study of Social Structure and Ethnic Replacement in Residential Architecture of the Tumilaca Valley. In Domestic Architecture, Ethnicity, and Complementarity in the South-Central Andes, edited by Aldenderfer, Mark S., pp. 4254. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City.Google Scholar
Bermann, Marc, Goldstein, Paul S., Stanish, Charles, and Watanabe, Luis 1989 The Collapse of the Tiwanaku State: A View from the Osmore Drainage. In Ecology, Settlement and History in the Osmore Drainage, Peru, edited by Rice, Don S., Stanish, Charles, and Scarr, Phillip R., pp. 269285. BAR International Series, vol. ii. BAR, Oxford.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1964 A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design. American Antiquity 29:425441.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1978 Dimensional Analysis of Behavior and Site Structure: Learning from an Eskimo Hunting Stand. American Antiquity 43:330361.Google Scholar
Burgi, Peter T., Williams, Sloan A., Buikstra, Jane E., Clark, Niki R., Cerna, Maria Cecilia Lozada, and Pino, Elva Torres 1989 Aspects of Mortuary Differentiation at the Site of Estuquina, Southern Peru. In Ecology, Settlement and History in the Osmore Drainage, Peru, edited by Rice, Don S., Stanish, Charles, and Scarr, Phillip R., pp. 347369. BAR International Series, vol. ii. BAR, Oxford.Google Scholar
Chenault, Mark L. 2002 The Micro-Archaeology of Hohokam Floors. In Culture and Environment in the American Southwest: Essays in Honor of Robert C. Euler, edited by Phillips, David and Ware, John, pp. 89–112. SWCA Environmental Consultants, Phoenix, Arizona.Google Scholar
Clark, Niki R. 1993 The Estuquina Textile Tradition: Cultural Patterning in Late Prehistoric Fabrics in Moquegua. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri.Google Scholar
Conrad, Geoffrey W. 1993 Domestic Architecture of the Estuquina Phase: Estuquina and San Antonio. In Domestic Architecture, Ethnicity, and Complementarity in the South-Central Andes, edited by Aldenderfer, Mark S., pp. 5565. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couture, Nicole C., and Sampeck, Kathryn 2003 Putuni: A History of Palace Architecture in Tiwanaku. In Tiwanaku and Its Hinterland: Archaeology and Paleoecology of an Andean Civilization, edited by Kolata, Alan L., pp. 226263, vol. 2. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Deal, Michael 1985 Household Pottery Disposal in the Maya Highlands: An Ethnoarchaeological Interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4:135142.Google Scholar
Dunnell, Robert C., and Stein, Julie K. 1989 Theoretical Issues in the Interpretation of Microartifacts. Geoarchaeology 4 (1):336.Google Scholar
Feldman, Robert F. 1989 The Early Ceramic Periods of Moquegua. In Ecology, Settlement and History in the Osmore Drainage, Peru, edited by Rice, Don. S., Stanish, Charles, and Scarr, Phillip R., pp. 207218. BAR International Series 545 (i). BAR, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fladmark, Knut. R. 1982 Microdebitage Analysis: Initial Considerations. Journal of Archaeological Science 9 (2):205220.Google Scholar
Foster, Catherine P. 2009 Household Archaeology and the Uruk Phenomenon: A Case Study from Kenan Tepe, Turkey. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Near Eastern Studies, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Foster, Catherine P. 2012 The Uruk Phenomenon: A View from the Household. In New Perspectives on Household Archaeology, edited by B. J. Parker and C. P. Foster, pp. 437–472. Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake, Indiana.Google Scholar
Gifford, Edward W. 1916 Composition of California Shell-Mounds. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Paul S. 1985 Tiwanaku Ceramics of the Moquegua Valley, Peru. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Paul S. 2005 Andean Diaspora: The Tiwanaku Colonies and the Origins of South American Empire. University Press of Florida , Gainesville.Google Scholar
Goldstein, David J., and Coleman, Robin C. 2004 Schinus Molle L. (Anacardiaceae) Chicha Production in the Central Andes. Economic Botany 58 (4):523529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, David J., Goldstein, Robin C. Coleman, and Williams, Patrick R. 2009 You Are What You Drink: A Sociocultural Reconstruction of Pre-Hispanic Fermented Beverage Use at Cerro Baúl, Moquegua, Peru. In Drink, Power, and Society in the Andes, edited by Jennings, Justin and Bowser, Brenda J., pp. 133166. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. Google Scholar
Graffam, Gray 1992 Beyond State Collapse: Rural History, Raised Fields, and Pastoralism in the South Andes. American Anthropologist 94 (4):882904.Google Scholar
Hayden, Brian, and Cannon, Aubrey 1983 Where the Garbage Goes: Refuse Disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2:117163.Google Scholar
Homsey-Messer, Lara, and Humkey, Kayce 2016 Microartifact Analysis and Site Formation of a Mississippian House Floor at Wickliffe Mounds, Kentucky. Southeastern Archaeology 35 (1):824.Google Scholar
Homsey-Messer, Lara, and Ortmann, Anthony 2016 Microartifact Analysis: Recent Application in Southeastern Archaeology. Southeastern Archaeology 35 (1):17.Google Scholar
Hull, Kathleen L. 1987 Identification of Cultural Site Formation Processes through Microdebitage Analysis. American Antiquity 52:772783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Phyllis S., Pritchard, James C., and Poplin, Eric C. 2016 In Much Smaller Things Forgotten: A Case for Microartifact Analysis in Cultural Resource Management. Southeastern Archaeology 35 (1):3850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Carol 1982 Village Ethnoarchaeology: Rural Iran in Archaeological Perspective. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kramer, Carol (editor) 1979 Ethnoarchaeology: Implications of Ethnography for Archaeology. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
LaMotta, Vincent M., and Schiffer, Michael B. 1999 Formation Processes of House Floor Assemblages. In The Archaeology of Household Activities, edited by Allison, Penelope M., pp. 19–29. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
McKellar, Judith A. 1983 Correlations and Explanation of Distributions. Atlatl: Occasional Papers No. 4. Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Duncan, Metcalfe, and Heath, Kathleen M. 1990 Microrefuse and Site Structure: The Hearths and Floors of the Heartbreak Hotel. American Antiquity 55:781796.Google Scholar
Murray, Priscilla 1980 Discard Location: The Ethnographic Data. American Antiquity 45:490502.Google Scholar
O'Connell, James F. 1987 Alyawara Site Structure and its Archaeological Implications. American Antiquity 52:74108.Google Scholar
Ortmann, Anthony L., and Schmidt, Caroline 2016 Investigating the Function of an Archaic-Period Earthwork Using Microartifacts. Southeastern Archaeology 35 (1):2537.Google Scholar
Owen, Bruce 2005 Distant Colonies and Explosive Collapse: The Two Stages of the Tiwanaku Diaspora in the Osmore Drainage. Latin American Antiquity 16:4580.Google Scholar
Owen, Bruce, and Goldstein, Paul S. 2001 Tiwanaku en Moquegua: Interacciones Regionales y Colapso. Boletin de Arqueologia PUCP 5:169188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Bradley J. 2012 Domestic Production and Subsistence in an Ubaid Household in Upper Mesopotamia. In New Perspectives on Household Archaeology, edited by Parker, Bradley J. and Foster, Catherine P., pp. 289–318. Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake, Indiana.Google Scholar
Parker, Bradley J., Foster, Catherine P., Nicoll, Kathleen, Kennedy, Jason R., Graham, Philip, Smith, Alexia, Hopwood, Dave E., Hopwood, Marie, Butler, Kristin, Healey, Elizabeth, Uzel, M. Baris, and Jensen, Reilly 2009 The Upper Tigris Archaeological Research Project (UTARP): A Preliminary Report from the 2007 and 2008 Field Seasons at Kenan Tepe. Anatolica 35:85152.Google Scholar
Pawlikowski, Maciej 2010 Micro-artefacts as Indicators of Human Activity: Tel el Farcha Archaeological Site: The Nile Delta Egypt. Auxiliary Sciences in Archaeology, Preservation of Relics and Environmental Engineering 10:17.Google Scholar
Peacock, Evan 1989 Microdebitage from Cached Pitted Stones. Mississippi Archaeology 24 (2):1727.Google Scholar
Rainville, Lynn 2005 Investigating Upper Mesopotamian Households Using Micro-Archaeological Techniques. Archaeopress, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rainville, Lynn 2012 Household Matters: Techniques for Understanding. In New Perspectives on Household Archaeology, edited by Parker, Bradley J. and Foster, Catherine P., pp. 139164. Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake, Indiana.Google Scholar
Rainville, Lynn 2015 Investigating Traces of Everyday Life in Ancient Households: Some Methodological Considerations. In Household Studies in Complex Societies: (Micro)Archaeological and Textual Approaches, edited by Müller, Miriam, pp. 1–27. Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Rosen, Arline M. 1989 Ancient Town and City Sites: A View from the Microscope. American Antiquity 54:564578.Google Scholar
Rosen, Arline M. 1993 Microartifacts as a Reflection of Cultural Factors in Site Formation. In Formation Processes in Archaeological Context, edited by Goldberg, Paul, Nash, David T., and Petraglia, Michael D., pp. 141148. Prehistory Press, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1978 Taking the Pulse of Method and Theory in American Archaeology. American Antiquity 43:153158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1983 Toward the Identification of Formation Processes. American Antiquity 48:156165.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1985 Is There a “Pompeii Premise” in Archaeology? Journal of Anthropological Research 41 (1):1841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1987 Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Shahack-Gross, Ruth, Bar-Yosef, Ofer, and Weiner, Steve 1997 Black-Coloured Bones in Hayonim Cave, Israel: Differentiating between Burning and Oxide Staining. Journal of Archaeological Science 24:439446.Google Scholar
Sharratt, Nicola 2011 Social Identities and State Collapse: A Diachronic Study of Tiwanaku Burials in the Moquegua Valley, Peru. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Illinois, Chicago.Google Scholar
Sharratt, Nicola 2015 Viviendo y Muriendo en medio de la efervescencia política: excavaciones en una aldea Tiwanaku terminal (950–1150 D.C) del valle de Moquegua, Perú. In El Horizonte Medio en los Andes Centro Sur: Nuevos aportes sobre la arqueología del sur de Perú, norte de Chile y altiplano de Bolivia, edited by Korpisaari, Antti and Chacama R., Juan, pp. 201–223. IFEA, Lima.Google Scholar
Sharratt, Nicola 2016 Crafting a Response to Collapse: Ceramic and Textile Production in the Wake of Tiwanaku State Breakdown. In Beyond Collapse, edited by Faulseit, Ronald K., pp. 407430. CAI Press, Carbondale, Illinois.Google Scholar
Sharratt, Nicola, Williams, Patrick Ryan, Cerna, Maria Cecilia Lozada, and Starbird, Jennifer 2012 Late Tiwanaku Mortuary Patterns in the Moquegua Drainage, Peru: Excavations at the Tumilaca la Chimba Cemetery. In Advances in Titicaca Basin Archaeology III, edited by Vranich, Alexei, Klarich, Elizabeth A., and Stanish, Charles, pp. 193203. Museum of Anthropology Publications, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
Sherwood, Sarah C. 2001 Microartifacts. In Earth Sciences and Archaeology, edited by Goldberg, Paul, Holliday, Vance T., and Ferring, C. Reid, pp. 327351. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Sherwood, Sarah C., Simek, Jan F., and Polhemus, Richard R. 1995 Artifact Size and Spatial Process: Macro- and Microartifacts in a Mississippian House. Geoarchaeology 10 (6):429455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, Kenny 2006 After State Collapse: How Tumilaca Communities Developed in the Upper Moquegua Valley, Peru. In After Collapse: The Regeneration of Complex Societies, edited by Schwartz, Glenn M. and Nichols, John J., pp. 114136. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Stanish, Charles 1989 Household Archaeology: Testing Models of Zonal Complementarity in the South Central Andes. American Anthropologist 91 (1):724.Google Scholar
Stein, Julie K., and Teltser, Patrice A. 1989 Size Distributions of Artifact Classes: Combining Macro- and Micro-fractions. Geoarchaeology 4 (1):130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutter, Richard C., and Sharratt, Nicola 2010 Continuity and Transformation during the Terminal Middle Horizon (A.D. 950–1150): A Bioarchaeological Assessment of Tumilaca Origins within the Middle Moquegua Valley, Peru. Latin American Antiquity 21:6786.Google Scholar
Tainter, Joseph 1988 The Collapse of Complex Societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ullah, Isaac 2009 Within-Room Spatial Analysis of Activity Areas at Late Neolithic Tabaqat al-Buma, Wadi Ziqlap, al-Kura, Jordan. Studies in the History and Archaeology of Jordan 10:8795.Google Scholar
Ullah, Isaac 2012 Particles of the Past: Microarchaeological Spatial Analysis of Ancient House Floors. In New Perspectives on Household Archaeology, edited by Parker, Bradley J. and Foster, Catherine P., pp. 123138. Eisenbrauns, Winona Lake, Indiana.Google Scholar
Vranich, Alexei 2001 La Piramide de Akapana: Reconsiderano el Centro Monumental de Tiwanaku. Boletin de Arqueologia PUCP 5:295308.Google Scholar
Watson, Patty Jo 1979 Archaeological Ethnology in Western Iran. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Weiner, Stephan 2010 Microarchaeology: Beyond the Visible Archaeological Record. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Williams, Patrick Ryan 2002 Rethinking Disaster-Induced Collapse in the Demise of the Andean Highland States: Wari and Tiwanaku. World Archaeology 33 (3):361374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Sloan A. 1990 The Skeletal Biology of Estuquiña: A Late Intermediate Period Site in Southern Peru. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar
Williams, Sloan A., Buikstra, Jane E., Clark, Niki R., Cerna, Maria Cecilia Lozada, and Pino, Elva Torres 1989 Mortuary Site Excavations and Skeletal Biology in the Osmore Project. In Ecology, Settlement and History in the Osmore Drainage, Peru, edited by Rice, Don S., Stanish, Charles, and Scarr, Phillip R., pp. 329346. BAR International Series, 545(i). BAR, Oxford.Google Scholar
Yoffee, Norman, and Cowgill, George L. 1988 The Collapse of Ancient States and Civilizations. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Parker and Sharratt supplementary material

Parker and Sharratt supplementary material 1

Download Parker and Sharratt supplementary material(File)
File 29.8 KB